Leanne McGoolsby first downloaded Tinder, the app that matches people based on mutual swipes, a few years ago in Taiwan. At first, she would go on dates with interesting people outside of her circles or those that were just visiting Taiwan for a short time. Eventually, she became involved in a relationship and did not need to use the app anymore.
After McGoolsby’s relationship fizzled out, she decided to try out the dating scene once again. This time, though, she got messages on Tinder that were somewhat off-putting and borderline creepy. One read, “I’ve got the little spoon position available for hire. What would you rate your cuddling abilities on a scale of 1 to 10?”
Another guy’s first pick-up line was, “I am a gentle man. I am here to love you.” McGoolsby then decided Tinder was not for her. “There are a lot of weirdos out there,” she said.
Photo courtesy of Jamie Mactography
Staff reporter Dana Ter was a first-time Tinder user and a skeptic. She had only heard horror stories about meeting people through dating apps, but still decided to give it a try. The first guy she matched with, she went to meet for a drink at 1am. After their date, Ter thought she would never see him again because it was Tinder and the guy was using the app to hook up while he was backpacking around the world. Surprisingly, though, Ter and her new boyfriend were soon inseparable and found themselves on the verge of something special.
LIFESTYLE APP
Tinder describes itself as a location-based social discovery app that helps mutually interested parties communicate with each other. When the app is mentioned casually in conversations though, a lot of people think Tinder is the way to find no-strings-attached one night stands nearby.
Photo courtesy of Tinder
According to Tinder spokesperson Evan Bonnstetter, this is far from the truth.
“Calling Tinder a hook-up app is a misconception. In fact, the vast majority of our users are looking to form meaningful, long-term relationships through Tinder. Tinder is for dating, friendships, marriage and everything in between,” Bonnstetter said.
An US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing which went public last month reported that Tinder had 9.6 million users by September. This means that there are a lot of people swiping left and right and looking for someone special. Now, Tinder is aiming to take on Taiwan by looking to connect people through their behaviors.
Photo courtesy of Jamie Mactography
Bonnstetter believes that Tinder has plenty of potential in Taiwan.
“Taiwan is in Tinder’s top 40 countries globally and in our top five markets in Asia,” he said.
To push into the Taiwan market, Tinder is sponsoring various nightlife activities such as ladies’ nights at clubs and the recently completed tour of the hip-hoppers, Far East Movement.
The plans are not just for when the sun goes down, though. Soon Tinder will be doing pop-up fitness classes in different areas of Taiwan as well as other events that match people through their lifestyle instead of just swiping right.
IS TRUE LOVE POSSIBLE ON TINDER?
McGoolsby says that finding soul mates on Tinder is possible. “Loads of my friends have met their significant others on there,” she said.
While Ter has experienced finding love on Tinder, she thinks that she is one of the lucky ones.
“If Tinder is solely based on looks and making quick judgments on people by having to swipe right or left based on their initial pictures, then it’ll be hard for it to move away from being primarily a hook-up app,” she said.
Ter believes that matching people through lifestyle choices is a good idea, but she doesn’t think that would make Tinder much different from Match.com or eHarmony, both dating Web sites that charge users. She thinks it is really up to the individual users to find the best way to use Tinder.
“I’ve had some guys message me saying they’re just looking for a fuck buddy, and other times, it ends up being a relationship. It’s all about chance really,” she said.
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week’s air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former US intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world’s deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend