If you don’t know who Owen Jones is it’s probably time to find out. He’s a young political commentator, still only 30, though he looks much younger, and omnipresent on YouTube. He’s notable for being what the British left has long needed, a charismatic voice espousing what are in some quarters its distinctly unfashionable views.
In The Establishment, his second book, Jones presents a blistering picture of the UK today. Whereas the term “Establishment” in the 1960s, when it was invented, summoned up images of privately-educated gentlemen eating expensive meals and quietly arranging national policy behind the scenes, in Jones’s usage it comes to stand for a voracious financial sector that dictates government policy, a corrupt police-force working to reinforce that same government’s class-based and sometimes anti-immigrant policies, a widespread reluctance by the ultra-rich and their companies to pay any taxes at all, some of the strictest anti-trades-union legislation in Europe, and the punishment of the poor for minor misdemeanors while the very rich get bailed out by the state for what are far more heinous crimes.
This is fighting talk, and just what the parliamentary opposition needs after the centrist, and even center-right, policies of New Labor when in power under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, and the perceived lack of charisma of its present leadership.
Jones has all the right credentials for such a role. He was born into a working-class but highly political northern family, educated at state schools, then got into Oxford where he graduated with a degree in history. After working on London’s The Independent newspaper, he moved to The Guardian earlier this year, and is a frequent invitee to TV political talk-shows where his combined charm and persuasiveness can’t help making a strong impression.
What, then, does The Establishment argue? Essentially, that for several decades after World War II there was an implicit consensus in the UK that state influence in economic and social life was both inevitable and beneficial, and that a mixed economy, state-controlled plus private, was the norm. With the ascent to power of Margaret Thatcher in 1979, this changed, and what Jones calls the Establishment mantra, that a free market is good for everyone and government influence is invariably stifling of initiative, came to prominence. New Labor, too, swung to the right (now seen as the center), and voices such as Jones’s came to be perceived as “out of touch with reality,” and even “extreme.”
Life in the City of London, the financial center, is chillingly portrayed. “Some of the sexism, homophobia and racism was just staggering,” one employee is quoted as saying. Just mention the sufferings of the poor on the dealing floors and you were shouted down. Yet these people, Jones says, were allowed to transform themselves into “giant casinos, taking huge bets with other people’s money in a desperate rush to make untold riches.” In 2012, in addition, 2,714 UK bankers were paid a million pounds [NT$49 million] a year or more, 12 times as many as in any other EU country. But when such banks failed they were, as in the US, bailed out by the taxpayer.
The reluctance of corporations to pay tax is also highlighted. Their accountants are hired by government to help frame tax laws, then, for a fee, advise the private sector of the loop-holes. The largest taxpayers negotiate what they should pay with the HMRC (the UK tax department), then often delay paying what’s been agreed. Those owing small amounts, by contrast, are mercilessly pursued over any defaults.
The UK has an extensive system of weekly payments for the unemployed and the disabled, and one of this book’s targets is the government’s strategies for reducing the number of people claiming these benefits. Jones subjects two companies employed by the UK government to do this, Atos and A4e, to detailed analysis. In a three-month period in 2012, he writes, 42 percent of appeals against work capacity judgments by the former were upheld, while the latter’s attempts to get people back to work are described as “shambolic” (the company ended its contract in March last year).
These are examples of one of Jones’s most persistent themes: the way private firms enrich themselves at government expense. This can be found in the chapter “Scrounging off the State,” a phrase that Jones here turns on its head. Rather than using it to refer to dishonest benefit claimants (as most of the media do), he employs it to refer to high-profile corporations that make millions from state contracts in areas such as health under the current Conservative/ Liberal-Democrat Coalition.
The police are the subject of another scathing chapter. Necessary for maintaining order, they are now often also an arm of repressive state policies, Jones says, citing “endemic racism; deaths following police contact … the indiscriminate stop-and-search of young black men; the harassment of protesters … attacks on trade unionists,” and the forming of long-term sexual relationships with female dissidents by some of the 1,200 undercover officers (a number cited earlier this week) allegedly operating in the country.
Other Jones themes are the “revolving door” through which men and women move from politics into lucrative business jobs and vice-versa, and the lack of any strong popular movement to deflect the people’s anger upwards against the bankers, rather than downwards against immigrants and benefit claimants.
Following the success of the far-right UK Independence Party (Ukip) in last week’s by-elections, Jones wrote in The Guardian that “a discredited elite that unleashed the beast of right-wing populism is not going to defeat it.” It was a conclusion that included all the other parties, his own political left included.
But he offered no solution other than “soul-searching.” This new book, then, remains his essential analysis, and recommendable for anyone concerned with UK politics and with a relatively radical turn of mind — even if last week suggested that few in the UK itself are attending to what is by any standards its shocking and disturbing message.
Cheng Ching-hsiang (鄭青祥) turned a small triangle of concrete jammed between two old shops into a cool little bar called 9dimension. In front of the shop, a steampunk-like structure was welded by himself to serve as a booth where he prepares cocktails. “Yancheng used to be just old people,” he says, “but now young people are coming and creating the New Yancheng.” Around the corner, Yu Hsiu-jao (饒毓琇), opened Tiny Cafe. True to its name, it is the size of a cupboard and serves cold-brewed coffee. “Small shops are so special and have personality,” she says, “people come to Yancheng to find such treasures.” She
Late last month Philippines Foreign Affairs Secretary Theresa Lazaro told the Philippine Senate that the nation has sufficient funds to evacuate the nearly 170,000 Filipino residents in Taiwan, 84 percent of whom are migrant workers, in the event of war. Agencies have been exploring evacuation scenarios since early this year, she said. She also observed that since the Philippines has only limited ships, the government is consulting security agencies for alternatives. Filipinos are a distant third in overall migrant worker population. Indonesia has over 248,000 workers, followed by roughly 240,000 Vietnamese. It should be noted that there are another 170,000
In July of 1995, a group of local DJs began posting an event flyer around Taipei. It was cheaply photocopied and nearly all in English, with a hand-drawn map on the back and, on the front, a big red hand print alongside one prominent line of text, “Finally… THE PARTY.” The map led to a remote floodplain in Taipei County (now New Taipei City) just across the Tamsui River from Taipei. The organizers got permission from no one. They just drove up in a blue Taiwanese pickup truck, set up a generator, two speakers, two turntables and a mixer. They
Hannah Liao (廖宸萱) recalls the harassment she experienced on dating apps, an experience that left her frightened and disgusted. “I’ve tried some voice-based dating apps,” the 30-year-old says. “Right away, some guys would say things like, ‘Wanna talk dirty?’ or ‘Wanna suck my d**k?’” she says. Liao’s story is not unique. Ministry of Health and Welfare statistics show a more than 50 percent rise in sexual assault cases related to online encounters over the past five years. In 2023 alone, women comprised 7,698 of the 9,413 reported victims. Faced with a dating landscape that can feel more predatory than promising, many in
RSS