The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on May 18 held a rally in Taichung to mark the anniversary of President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20. The title of the rally could be loosely translated to “May 18 recall fraudulent goods” (518退貨ㄌㄨㄚˋ！).
Unlike in English, where the terms are the same, “recall” (退貨) in this context refers to product recalls due to damaged, defective or fraudulent merchandise, not the political recalls (罷免) currently dominating the headlines.
I attended the rally to determine if the impression was correct that the TPP under party Chairman Huang Kuo-Chang (黃國昌) had little of a vision or platform that distinguished the party from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and was largely devoted to attacking President Lai and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). The impression was correct; the speeches and ideas presented could have been lifted from the KMT’s Web site and marketing.
Photo: Courtney Donovan Smith, Taipei Times
Much of this is explored in this column on May 28, “Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP.” The vision that had animated party founder and 2024 presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) of being allied with the KMT, but retaining some key distinct differences and independence, is over in the Huang era.
Beyond confirming this, seeing the TPP in action was a worthwhile experience.
OUTSIDE THE CELESTIAL KINGDOM
Photo: Courtney Donovan Smith, Taipei Times
Political rallies, aside from a few key presidential ones, are different in Taichung than Taipei. If this rally had been held in Taipei, they would have spared no expense to drive a big crowd and put on a huge spectacle of passion and frenzy.
All the national media, the television talk shows and international press are headquartered in Taipei. Unless assigned to a presidential campaign, these Taipei-based journalists consider any place across the Tamsui River irrelevant.
At this Taichung rally, there were no satellite trucks or journalists covering the event. Only two very bored-looking guys sat in the dedicated media tent, despite Taichung being the nation’s second-largest city. They might have been catching up on sleep.
Photo: Courtney Donovan Smith, Taipei Times
Though people briefly passed by from the MRT station next door or the large Shui An Temple that formed the backdrop to the rally, excluding party members and volunteers and the police, there were roughly three or four hundred dedicated audience members.
It was a predominantly middle-aged crowd, and it appeared that retirees easily outnumbered those under age 30. This is not to suggest that polling showing TPP support higher among younger voters is not accurate, only that the younger high-tech workers in Taichung who backed the party work overtime hours and students often are studying out of town.
SUCH A PLEASANT DAY
Photo: Courtney Donovan Smith, Taipei Times
The crowd was friendly, polite and thoughtfully considerate to each other as they calmly gathered to resist Lai’s so-called dictatorial regime hell bent on destroying democracy and weaponizing the judiciary to lock up all opposition and return the nation to martial law. Other than some brief light rain, it was a pleasant day to listen to people on stage tell us tyranny and repression were on the march.
The organizers had thoughtfully prepared pre-printed sticky notes and markers for people to write in why they thought the president should be recalled, and a wall for them to stick them up on. It was popular, and the wall was quickly filled up.
Comments ranged from simple to very detailed about how awful the president is, as well as protestations that Ko is innocent and should be released, though that he is detained on alleged corruption charges was not mentioned. Judging by the comments, Lai is a “big liar,” “trash,” a “dictator” and many other things, including one post that simply said in English in large letters, “Bad.”
Many featured clever puns and plays on words that Taiwanese do so well. I had to laugh when I saw one note lamenting “I would also love to go to Finland,” undoubtedly referring to the Lai administration choosing heavy metal star and former lawmaker Freddy Lim (林昶佐) as representative to the Scandinavian nation.
A couple of children were having trouble finding an open spot to put their sticky notes up on the wall, so I helpfully pointed out some spots for them. Other adults kindly moved to make space for them, and their parents smiled and nodded thankfully that their children could also join in pouring out vitriol at the president. The children looked proud to be participating alongside the adults.
Perhaps also to make the event feel more child-friendly, there were a few claw machines with big, adorable stuffed bears in them bearing apocalyptic stickers about dictatorship and saying that electricity shortages will lead to job shortages. Some were enthusiastically playing the machines, but it appeared that the cuddly-looking bears predicting doom were too big for the machines to handle.
Seeming anachronistically optimistic in the Huang era, some in the crowd wore the cute “little sprout” headbands symbolizing a new future from the last presidential campaign, while a couple of people carried around old campaign balloons for Ko’s presidential run featuring his face and the words “rational, scientific, pragmatic.” Those Ko-era sentiments were not echoed from the stage.
Though Republic of China (ROC) flags were present, there were far less than at a KMT rally, marking one difference between the supporters of the two parties. Bags reading “I am Taiwanese, I oppose (the pan-) greens” had been dispersed, and many proudly carried.
ANYTHING BUT FRENZIED
The entire spectacle was surreal. From the stage, the language was of existential crisis and the crowd would respond as they do at rallies with affirmations and waving their signs warning of dictatorship and resisting fascism, and responded enthusiastically when Huang personally spoke.
Yet, the entire thing felt more like a picnic than a call to rise up in resistance.
In this part of the country, hundreds often come out to protest plans for projects like crematoriums or stray animal compounds, at times violently. Those protests have an urgency and real anger.
This crowd did not feel particularly angry or concerned in any immediate sense. Clearly, they must believe some of what the protest was about, or they would not have shown up — but the sense was of something remote and hypothetical.
They might be able to raise the crowd into something resembling a frenzy in Taipei, but this Taichung crowd was anything but frenzied.
Donovan’s Deep Dives is a regular column by Courtney Donovan Smith (石東文) who writes in-depth analysis on everything about Taiwan’s political scene and geopolitics. Donovan is also the central Taiwan correspondent at ICRT FM100 Radio News, co-publisher of Compass Magazine, co-founder Taiwan Report (report.tw) and former chair of the Taichung American Chamber of Commerce. Follow him on X: @donovan_smith.
From the last quarter of 2001, research shows that real housing prices nearly tripled (before a 2012 law to enforce housing price registration, researchers tracked a few large real estate firms to estimate housing price behavior). Incomes have not kept pace, though this has not yet led to defaults. Instead, an increasing chunk of household income goes to mortgage payments. This suggests that even if incomes grow, the mortgage squeeze will still make voters feel like their paychecks won’t stretch to cover expenses. The housing price rises in the last two decades are now driving higher rents. The rental market
July 21 to July 27 If the “Taiwan Independence Association” (TIA) incident had happened four years earlier, it probably wouldn’t have caused much of an uproar. But the arrest of four young suspected independence activists in the early hours of May 9, 1991, sparked outrage, with many denouncing it as a return to the White Terror — a time when anyone could be detained for suspected seditious activity. Not only had martial law been lifted in 1987, just days earlier on May 1, the government had abolished the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of National Mobilization for Suppression of the Communist
When life gives you trees, make paper. That was one of the first thoughts to cross my mind as I explored what’s now called Chung Hsing Cultural and Creative Park (中興文化創意園區, CHCCP) in Yilan County’s Wujie Township (五結). Northeast Taiwan boasts an abundance of forest resources. Yilan County is home to both Taipingshan National Forest Recreation Area (太平山國家森林遊樂區) — by far the largest reserve of its kind in the country — and Makauy Ecological Park (馬告生態園區, see “Towering trees and a tranquil lake” in the May 13, 2022 edition of this newspaper). So it was inevitable that industrial-scale paper making would
Hualien lawmaker Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) is the prime target of the recall campaigns. They want to bring him and everything he represents crashing down. This is an existential test for Fu and a critical symbolic test for the campaigners. It is also a crucial test for both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and a personal one for party Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). Why is Fu such a lightning rod? LOCAL LORD At the dawn of the 2020s, Fu, running as an independent candidate, beat incumbent Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmaker Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) and a KMT candidate to return to the legislature representing
RSS