There can’t be many connections between Lady Gaga, Andy Warhol, the cows on yogurt adverts and Father Christmas. But here’s one: they’ve all been spotted wearing sunglasses and analyzed by Vanessa Brown, senior lecturer in design and visual culture at Nottingham Trent University, England, as part of her theory into the “coolness” of shades and why we wear them. It’s not, she can report, just to keep the sun out of our eyes.
A trip to the supermarket was the inspiration for Brown’s research. “On the way home after decorating my new flat, I stopped at a supermarket to buy a pint of milk,” she says. “I was wearing old painting clothes and was generally a bit of a state, so as I left the car I grabbed my sunglasses from the dashboard. But when I approached the store I caught sight of myself reflected in the glass facade, and realized I looked quite cool.
“Whether I did or not is obviously debatable, but it struck me how odd it was that the mere addition of one accessory could transform my perception of myself.”
Photo: Reuters
Brown has always been interested in the meanings of objects and their cultural values — she has previously studied Tupperware and the idea of the housewife — so “sunglasses seemed like an ideal next project,” she says.
With the help of the British Optical Association and the curator of its museum, Brown began searching through thousands of images, adverts, films, fashion photographs, documentary photographs and optical industry journals to investigate the symbolism of shades. “I found that sunglasses were always strongly associated with the glamour and power of modern technology, control of emotion, control of the body and control of interactions with others,” says Brown.
She then started to analyze the link between the wearing of sunglasses and the broader phenomenon of “what it is to be cool.” Brown, who is 40, explains: “Sunglasses are appealing because they connote coolness, which is used to sell almost everything.” That was obvious from the sunglass-wearing cows in the yogurt ad. “Some other researchers say coolness is emerging as the highest value in Western society,” she adds. “This can be seen as a very worrying and profoundly antisocial shift, as cool characters display lack of concern for others, lack of respect for authority or social convention, and a focus on style above all else.”
However, Brown’s research suggests that cool, sunglass-wearing heroes and villains are not so worrying. The shades represent their composure, their “self-possession in the face of seemingly overwhelming forces,” she explains. “This resonates with experiences many of us share — we’re increasingly alienated from work, each other and the natural world, increasingly aware of financial, medical, environmental risk and increasingly faced with identity choices. By shading the eyes, we can appear detached from the chaos, either frankly unbothered by, or utterly on top of, the frantic pace of technology and fashion.
“Sunglasses, by covering those vulnerable eyes and implying that connection with sleek engineering and glossy surfaces, make it easier to pull off a truly cool demeanor.” Brown says her research has highlighted the proliferation of sunglasses in DVD covers, music videos, fashion images and adverts. “There are thousands of examples of sunglasses being used in visual culture as a key prop,” she says.
“Increasingly, images of shaded eyes are used to sell products by suggesting power and prestige. They are perfect visual copy, suggesting mystique and self-possession as well as the glamour of being immersed in light.”
Lady Gaga, says Brown, uses sunglasses to suggest her chameleon, avant-garde identity. She also points out that people buy sunglasses for their avatars to wear in the online game Second Life — where there is no sun. “They experience their idealized, more glamorous identity in Second Life from behind another glass barrier which hides the ‘real’ them — their computer screen,” Brown explains. “My research demonstrates how many challenging aspects of modern life are negotiable through the shading of the eye.”
Back in the real world, other sunglass-wearers that came under Brown’s scrutiny include the jazz musician Miles Davis, “who decided to wear shades to avoid eye contact with racists and squares,” and Andy Warhol who, Brown says, used sunglasses “as a means of glamorous detachment.”
As for the fashionista, often shrouded in big sunglasses a la Vogue editor Anna Wintour, Brown says this represents disdain for others and being “unmoved” by the latest shocking model to strut down the catwalk. “Sunglasses also reflect light — which itself has been a metaphor for modernity, as in ‘enlightenment,’” she adds. “But that reflecting light also represents the success of modern celebrity and glamour — either flashbulbs, studio lights or the sun of exotic holidays.”
Brown dismisses criticism that the value of her research on sunglasses could be questioned. “The study of fashion and popular culture is always open to question because it appears to address the less serious issues of life,” she says. “But my dedication to studying popular cultural images and objects comes from a conviction that the things that people do ‘without thinking’ are the most telling about their fears, desires, motivations and concerns.”
May 18 to May 24 Pastor Yang Hsu’s (楊煦) congregation was shocked upon seeing the land he chose to build his orphanage. It was surrounded by mountains on three sides, and the only way to access it was to cross a river by foot. The soil was poor due to runoff, and large rocks strewn across the plot prevented much from growing. In addition, there was no running water or electricity. But it was all Yang could afford. He and his Indigenous Atayal wife Lin Feng-ying (林鳳英) had already been caring for 24 orphans in their home, and they were in
On May 2, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), at a meeting in support of Taipei city councilors at party headquarters, compared President William Lai (賴清德) to Hitler. Chu claimed that unlike any other democracy worldwide in history, no other leader was rooting out opposing parties like Lai and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). That his statements are wildly inaccurate was not the point. It was a rallying cry, not a history lesson. This was intentional to provoke the international diplomatic community into a response, which was promptly provided. Both the German and Israeli offices issued statements on Facebook
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday delivered an address marking the first anniversary of his presidency. In the speech, Lai affirmed Taiwan’s global role in technology, trade and security. He announced economic and national security initiatives, and emphasized democratic values and cross-party cooperation. The following is the full text of his speech: Yesterday, outside of Beida Elementary School in New Taipei City’s Sanxia District (三峽), there was a major traffic accident that, sadly, claimed several lives and resulted in multiple injuries. The Executive Yuan immediately formed a task force, and last night I personally visited the victims in hospital. Central government agencies and the
Australia’s ABC last week published a piece on the recall campaign. The article emphasized the divisions in Taiwanese society and blamed the recall for worsening them. It quotes a supporter of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) as saying “I’m 43 years old, born and raised here, and I’ve never seen the country this divided in my entire life.” Apparently, as an adult, she slept through the post-election violence in 2000 and 2004 by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the veiled coup threats by the military when Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) became president, the 2006 Red Shirt protests against him ginned up by
RSS