Chakrabhand Posayakrit relies on the sunlight that pours through the high glass windows of his Bangkok home to create the traditional Thai art that won him the coveted status of National Artist.
For four decades the 65-year-old has lived and worked peacefully in his wooden downtown house, producing mystical paintings and delicate, intricate puppets which perform at theaters across Thailand.
He has even opened his home up as a museum, school and meeting place for fellow artists to share his passion for the kingdom’s creative history.
Bangkok developers, however, rarely think twice about cultural heritage when they throw up skyscrapers, and now a 32-story condominium is threatening to dwarf Chakrabhand’s house of cultural treasures in the up-and-coming Ekkamai area.
But like a growing number of individuals, Chakrabhand is determined to fight the rampant development that many say is threatening the city’s character.
“If they go ahead with their plan to construct that big building, I will have to move out because I will not be able to do my job,” says Chakrabhand.
The artist has submitted a petition against the project to the Thai king, while his supporters are piling pressure on the developers, trying to convince them of the social impact of their project.
Chakrabhand has also consulted lawyers, architects and engineers, most of whom tell him that Singapore-based developer Dalvey Residence — who did not respond to telephone queries — was following the law.
“The more I hear about how little Thai laws and authorities support the general public, the more I lose my faith in fairness in our country,” Chakrabhand said.
Sukanya Panthajak, who works with the environment ministry’s policy and planning department, says laws exist to protect buildings or areas of historic or natural significance, but many structures fall outside that definition.
“Chakrabhand’s place is precious mainly in terms of culture and arts,” she said.
While Bangkok’s streets were once filled with shophouses and traditional wooden Thai homes, the skyline is now dominated by skyscrapers, mega-malls and plush hotels — pushing many long-term residents out.
Hundreds of small shopkeepers are currently locked in a legal battle to prevent Bangkok’s night bazaar, a hugely popular tourist attraction, from being razed and replaced with a mall.
Ordinary residents are also doing what they can to battle big business, only to find the rules and red tape are not on their side.
Sutdhya Vajrabhai, a retired businessman, has a modest plot of land in the Ploenchit area, another hot spot for development.
Construction of a 30-story hotel next door has caused cracks in his floors, while broken underground pipes have flooded his property.
“A large-scale construction project means hundreds or thousands of people coming to live or work there, with more cars, more traffic, more trash, more air pollution and many other issues in the long term,” he says.
He took his complaint to the National Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (NREPP) department, who halted the project, but Sutdhya says the developers have gone ahead regardless.
Buildings do not need an environmental impact assessment or approval from the NREPP as long as they are no bigger than 80 units, so Sutdhya says the developers simply revised their plan from 320 to 79 units, and will apply to the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) later to add more.
An official at the BMA who did not wish to be named said that all the projects they approved went ahead according to the relevant building control laws.
For the moment, Boonyawat Tiptus, vice president at Thailand’s Council of Architects, warns that taking on large-scale development projects is tricky given the funds companies can ply into legal advice.
“Maybe the most practical solution is that Master Chakrabhand finds a new plot of land somewhere away from the city in order to carry on work peacefully,” he says.
But Chakrabhand is not planning on giving up the fight that easily.
“I still believe in the existence of fairness somewhere in our society,” he said.
“This is a battle for not only for myself, but also other people likely to suffer from large-scale development projects.”
When life gives you trees, make paper. That was one of the first thoughts to cross my mind as I explored what’s now called Chung Hsing Cultural and Creative Park (中興文化創意園區, CHCCP) in Yilan County’s Wujie Township (五結). Northeast Taiwan boasts an abundance of forest resources. Yilan County is home to both Taipingshan National Forest Recreation Area (太平山國家森林遊樂區) — by far the largest reserve of its kind in the country — and Makauy Ecological Park (馬告生態園區, see “Towering trees and a tranquil lake” in the May 13, 2022 edition of this newspaper). So it was inevitable that industrial-scale paper making would
Asked to define sex, most people will say it means penetration and anything else is just “foreplay,” says Kate Moyle, a psychosexual and relationship therapist, and author of The Science of Sex. “This pedestals intercourse as ‘real sex’ and other sexual acts as something done before penetration rather than as deserving credit in their own right,” she says. Lesbian, bisexual and gay people tend to have a broader definition. Sex education historically revolved around reproduction (therefore penetration), which is just one of hundreds of reasons people have sex. If you think of penetration as the sex you “should” be having, you might
Hualien lawmaker Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) is the prime target of the recall campaigns. They want to bring him and everything he represents crashing down. This is an existential test for Fu and a critical symbolic test for the campaigners. It is also a crucial test for both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and a personal one for party Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). Why is Fu such a lightning rod? LOCAL LORD At the dawn of the 2020s, Fu, running as an independent candidate, beat incumbent Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmaker Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) and a KMT candidate to return to the legislature representing
July 21 to July 27 If the “Taiwan Independence Association” (TIA) incident had happened four years earlier, it probably wouldn’t have caused much of an uproar. But the arrest of four young suspected independence activists in the early hours of May 9, 1991, sparked outrage, with many denouncing it as a return to the White Terror — a time when anyone could be detained for suspected seditious activity. Not only had martial law been lifted in 1987, just days earlier on May 1, the government had abolished the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of National Mobilization for Suppression of the Communist
RSS