When it comes to airing our dirty laundry, we wonder why the laundry services we pay for always do a better job than we can at home. With the help of "professional" washing machines, laundry services simply do a cleaner job. Professional laundry services count on front-loading
washers to impress the customers, while most Taiwanese households still stick with the conventional top-loading washers to get the dirty job done.
In the past, front-loading washers in Taiwan were so prohibitively expensive that only professional cleaners or laundromats could afford them. In recent years, to satisfy Asian customers, washing-machine manufacturers have been doing their best to develop inexpensive front-loaders that can still get clothes cleaner, save more water and electricity and use less detergent than top-loaders.
Moreover, the trendy aspect of nano-technology used in the latest washers is sure to please tech-savvy users.
More importantly, the overall price of a front-loader has now plunged to somewhere between NT$25,000 and NT$30,000, depending on loading capacity.
Huang Shih-liang (
PHOTO: AP
Taipei times: What is the front-loading washing machine?
Huang Shih-liang: This type of efficient washing machine has a door in the front instead of an opening on top of the machine. Clothes are placed in a horizontally-oriented stainless-steel drum instead of a conventional tub with central agitator.
TT: In terms of the operation, what is the difference between the the top-loading washer and the front-loading washer?
HSL: The top-loading washer is built on a vertical axis and uses more water to fully immerse clothes in the tub and scrub them clean with agitation. The front-loading washing machine, however, is built on a horizontal-axis and does not have an agitator that is used in a top-loading vertical-axis washing machine. With a more advanced structure, the front-loader generally uses less water, electricity and detergent.
TT: Why does the front-loading washing machine use less water and save more money?
HSL: A front-loader with the loading capacity of up to 10kg will consume 70 liters to100l of water in one load of laundry. Meanwhile, a top-loader with the same capacity will take 180l to 240l liters of water. Clearly a front-loader reduces water consumption by at least half and the amount of detergent used is also reduced in the process.
TT: If equipped with the same loading capacity, why does the tumble of the front-loader look smaller than that of the top-loader?
HSL: In a front-loader, the clothes are lifted and dropped into a more concentrated solution of water and detergent. The reversing tumble action kneads the water and detergent deeply into the fabric fibers. Since the washer never fills above the bottom of the washer door, much less water is used and less space is needed.
TT: Some front-loaders use warm water and nano-technology to do the laundry. Why do they do this?
HSL: Some front-loaders can automatically heat water up to 40?C to 60?C, which further reduces detergent use and helps tackle smelly clothing. Some manufacturers have even incorporated what they call "silver nano-technology" to enhance the anti-bacteria function. This is even more effective than the use of warm water for washing.
TT: What else do we have to keep in mind while using a front-loader?
HSL: First, the front-loader usually uses the foam produced by the detergent to gauge the cleaning process. Putting excessive detergent in the wash may cause front-loaders to wash clothing for excessive periods of time.
Second, as elderly or people with restricted movement sometimes find it difficult to bend to fill front-loaders, new designs are now emerging in which the performance advantages of front-loaders are coupled with the convenience of a top-loading design.
-- Translated by Daniel Cheng
April 14 to April 20 In March 1947, Sising Katadrepan urged the government to drop the “high mountain people” (高山族) designation for Indigenous Taiwanese and refer to them as “Taiwan people” (台灣族). He considered the term derogatory, arguing that it made them sound like animals. The Taiwan Provincial Government agreed to stop using the term, stating that Indigenous Taiwanese suffered all sorts of discrimination and oppression under the Japanese and were forced to live in the mountains as outsiders to society. Now, under the new regime, they would be seen as equals, thus they should be henceforth
Last week, the the National Immigration Agency (NIA) told the legislature that more than 10,000 naturalized Taiwanese citizens from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) risked having their citizenship revoked if they failed to provide proof that they had renounced their Chinese household registration within the next three months. Renunciation is required under the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), as amended in 2004, though it was only a legal requirement after 2000. Prior to that, it had been only an administrative requirement since the Nationality Act (國籍法) was established in
Three big changes have transformed the landscape of Taiwan’s local patronage factions: Increasing Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) involvement, rising new factions and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) significantly weakened control. GREEN FACTIONS It is said that “south of the Zhuoshui River (濁水溪), there is no blue-green divide,” meaning that from Yunlin County south there is no difference between KMT and DPP politicians. This is not always true, but there is more than a grain of truth to it. Traditionally, DPP factions are viewed as national entities, with their primary function to secure plum positions in the party and government. This is not unusual
US President Donald Trump’s bid to take back control of the Panama Canal has put his counterpart Jose Raul Mulino in a difficult position and revived fears in the Central American country that US military bases will return. After Trump vowed to reclaim the interoceanic waterway from Chinese influence, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth signed an agreement with the Mulino administration last week for the US to deploy troops in areas adjacent to the canal. For more than two decades, after handing over control of the strategically vital waterway to Panama in 1999 and dismantling the bases that protected it, Washington has
RSS