Gordon Liu (
Taipei Times: How did Quentin Tarantino talk to you into making the movies?
Liu: When I was told about Quentin's interest in working with me, I told his producer "tell him that I don't know him." When we met in Shanghai, I wore a Chinese suit in order to be formal. I did not expect him to appear in a Chinese suit also! And the first word he greeted me with was shi-fu! (
PHOTO: TAIPEI TIMES
TT: Why are there two roles? Was it yours or Tarantino's idea to have Pai Mei fondling his beard a lot?
Liu: Originally, my role was just Johnny Mo and Quentin wanted to play Pai Mei himself because he is so obsessed with such a vintage character. But when he was in make-up and asked my opinion, I told him, "You look like a Santa Claus, not a martial-arts master." He didn't play the role, instead he did Pai Mei's voice for the US and European version of the movie. It was my idea to make the comic gesture of Pai Mei stroking his beard. It was a different character compared with Johnny Mo. Being Mo the emphasis was on the actions and your expression had to be fierce. But Pai Mei is a role with more humor, he is a softer character (though he is strict with Uma Thurman's character), so the gesture was natural for me.
TT: What was it like to act in the fighting scenes with Uma Thurman?
Liu: If I were her, I would not have taken the two movies. She was punched a lot and slammed against the ground so many times in the movie. During the shooting, in Beijing, she had just given birth to a baby. For me, I've practiced martial arts for decades. But she was trained only for a few months and flew all the way to Beijing to shoot the fighting scenes. Actually, in the beginning, she only fought me in the air, maybe out of respect, until I said to her "Come on, hit me!" After that she had a killer's eyes when she fought with me.
TT: Was that real kung fu in the movie? The Eagle Foot style (
Liu: Of course. The scene when Thurman and I are practicing kung fu together in a cartoon format was the real Tiger-Crane style. It is one of the most famous kung fu styles of my martial arts clan, the Hung Gar style kung fu (洪拳). Quentin is such a fan of the Tiger-Crane style and he wanted me to display it once again on the big screen. As for the Eagle-Feet style, this was a style that contrasted well with the Tiger-Crane style. Actually both these two styles do not belong to Shaolin, or the legendary Pai Mei in history books. Quentin just did mix-and-match for the fun of it.
TT: Being a martial artist, a stuntman and an action actor for decades, how different is real kung fu from what we see in the movies?
Liu: For me, in a movie, you need not just the real kung fu to make believe, but you also have to be able to deliver the plot through the actions. That is the hard part. For a movie you have to express physical beauty in the fighting choreography, and also in your facial expressions. You have to fit in with the atmosphere and take on the personality of a role in relation to an opponent. I remember the most difficult scene in Kill Bill was a fight with Uma Thurman standing on the verge of a banister. I have to make several spins in attacking, while at the same time making my gestures beautiful and convey a killer's spirit toward Thurman. At the same time I had to be careful not to fall from the two-story building!
TT: How did it feel to work in a Hollywood movie?
Liu: It was luxurious, very comfortable. The division of labor is very clear and well-organized. You take enough breaks after a working day. It was much less hectic than in Hong Kong. I'm very honored, as a Chinese actor, to have played a role in both movies and I have to be thankful to Quentin, who has brought my clan's martial arts to the world.
TT: Have you been practicing kung-fu regularly, outside of the movies?
Liu: Yes, every day. I practice kung fu for my health. I can do without making movies but not without kung fu.
TT: What is your next project?
Liu: I am doing a martial-arts TV drama, about my great grand master Wong Fei-hong (黃飛鴻), and another period drama after that. Both will be shot in China.
June 2 to June 8 Taiwan’s woodcutters believe that if they see even one speck of red in their cooked rice, no matter how small, an accident is going to happen. Peng Chin-tian (彭錦田) swears that this has proven to be true at every stop during his decades-long career in the logging industry. Along with mining, timber harvesting was once considered the most dangerous profession in Taiwan. Not only were mishaps common during all stages of processing, it was difficult to transport the injured to get medical treatment. Many died during the arduous journey. Peng recounts some of his accidents in
“Why does Taiwan identity decline?”a group of researchers lead by University of Nevada political scientist Austin Wang (王宏恩) asked in a recent paper. After all, it is not difficult to explain the rise in Taiwanese identity after the early 1990s. But no model predicted its decline during the 2016-2018 period, they say. After testing various alternative explanations, Wang et al argue that the fall-off in Taiwanese identity during that period is related to voter hedging based on the performance of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Since the DPP is perceived as the guardian of Taiwan identity, when it performs well,
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on May 18 held a rally in Taichung to mark the anniversary of President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20. The title of the rally could be loosely translated to “May 18 recall fraudulent goods” (518退貨ㄌㄨㄚˋ！). Unlike in English, where the terms are the same, “recall” (退貨) in this context refers to product recalls due to damaged, defective or fraudulent merchandise, not the political recalls (罷免) currently dominating the headlines. I attended the rally to determine if the impression was correct that the TPP under party Chairman Huang Kuo-Chang (黃國昌) had little of a
A short walk beneath the dense Amazon canopy, the forest abruptly opens up. Fallen logs are rotting, the trees grow sparser and the temperature rises in places sunlight hits the ground. This is what 24 years of severe drought looks like in the world’s largest rainforest. But this patch of degraded forest, about the size of a soccer field, is a scientific experiment. Launched in 2000 by Brazilian and British scientists, Esecaflor — short for “Forest Drought Study Project” in Portuguese — set out to simulate a future in which the changing climate could deplete the Amazon of rainfall. It is
RSS