Many playwrights on reaching their maturity have sought a broader canvas to express their ideas with more complexity than a conventional one-and-a-half hour to two-hour time slot allows. They seek a format in which their concepts may be explored for many hours, or even days.
This is what director Stan Lai (賴聲川) has found. In his recent group project with the Drama Department of the National Institute of the Arts, he gives himself nearly seven hours, confident that his theme death - fully warrants such treatment.
The inspiration for the drama comes from the hugely popular The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying by Sogyal Rinpoche, which the New York Times Book Review lauded as the Tibetan equivalent of The Divine Comedy. As a starting point and central theme, Lai uses an anecdote related in Rinpoche's book about Patient Five, a woman who tells the story of her life as she faces imminent death.
Patient Five recalls her travels in France, where, when touring a castle, she is struck by a painting of a Chinese woman. Intrigued, she retraces the story of this woman, Ku Hsiang-lan, back to 1930s Shanghai. Feeling that her fate is inexplicably linked with the woman in the picture, she seeks Hsiang-lan out in a Shanghai hospital. Here she hears Hsiang-lan's story and begins to understand aspects of her own life.
The sense that all these stories which range in place from Shanghai to Paris to Taipei, and in time from the 1930s to the present are all a single story about men and women facing the immanence of death, is enhanced by the bold use of the theater space.
According to Wang Shih-hsing (王世信), a stage designer who has worked on many of Lai's cutting-edge productions, the idea originated after Lai watched a Buddhist festival in which a play took place around the audience, rather than in front of them. "We wanted the actors to be able to move around the audience, rather like the cyclic flow of life," he said. "All these areas," he added, pointing to the stage space, "were originally audience seats. We removed the seating."
The audience now sits in a central pit on rotating stools so they can follow the action as it moves around them. "This is the first time that this design has been tried in Taiwan," Wang said. Two stage levels, and even the ceiling, are used, surrounding the audience with the action, immersing them in it and ultimately making them part of the story. Structure, as ever, is an important aspect of Lai's work, and the stage design is instrumental in separating elements and creating links in this complex work.
And why seven hours? It just happened that way. "Everything has its own proper dimensions, just as in nature," Lai said.
According to Li Chi-wen (李季文), director's assistant to Lai, the play was originally intended as a small-scale teaching exercise in experimental theater but it was enlarged after massive interest from students. Although it is a joint production, with all the members providing input, the creative force is clearly Lai himself and his fascination with the belief that life is more than what happens on the surface.
"I am not trying to sell the concept of reincarnation to the audience," Lai insisted, yet he also admitted that the playing of multiple roles by some actors was intended to reinforce the idea of connections between people separated by time and space. "If we don't have another life," he said, "then there are too many things that are purely random and cannot be explained."
And so, in the wake of US President Donald Trump’s trip to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), all the experts on the Strait of Hormuz suddenly became experts on US-China-Taiwan relations. The Internet has certainly expanded human knowledge. Lots of these sudden experts made noise this week about Trump’s words after the meeting with PRC dictator Xi Jin-ping (習近平). Trump is going to sell out Taiwan! Longtime Taiwan commentator J. Michael Cole summed the situation up neatly in the Guardian: “We need to keep in mind that he has a tendency to say many things — sometimes contradicting himself within
Last week US President Donald Trump was asked by a reporter whether he would speak on the phone to the President of Taiwan. “l’ll speak to him. I speak to everybody. We have that situation very well in hand,” Trump said. This marked the second time in a couple of weeks he had said he would talk to the President of Taiwan. In 2016 he famously took a call from then-president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), when he was president-elect. Despite warnings that the apocalypse was nigh because of a phone call, the world quickly forgot about the conversation between two democratically-elected presidents.
May 25 to May 31 Few believed that apples could be cultivated on a commercial scale in Taiwan’s high mountains. When horticulturalist Cheng Chao-hsiung (程兆熊) first proposed the idea in 1955, both American and Taiwanese colleagues dismissed it as implausible, arguing that temperate fruit could not be reliably grown on a subtropical island, especially on rugged terrain. However, it was this terrain in the Central Mountain Range where many Chinese Civil War veterans were resettled in the late 1950s. With limited job prospects and no family in Taiwan, they were placed on cooperative farms aimed toward self-sufficiency. Some say the conditions
There is considerable frustration and confusion among many, both in Taiwan and abroad — including in Washington — as to why the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) seems so dead set on using their legislative leverage to slash defense spending and disrupt the ability of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration to function. Are they pawns of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)? Are they traitors? In reality, there are multiple reasons. In the first column in this series on this subject, “Donovan’s Deep Dives: How and why the TPP and KMT help Beijing” (Sat May 16, page 12), we examined three