The US would have you believe it is showing leadership in Asia. Yet the nation displaying real resolve is Japan.
Standing up to China over its rapidly expanding military strength is what the Indo-Pacific region wants from Washington. Instead, it was left to Japanese Minister of Defense Shinjiro Koizumi to do that when he took the stage at Asia’s premier security forum on Sunday. He offered a vision for the Indo-Pacific region that was more candid and ambitious than his US counterpart did the day before.
“This region must remain open to all countries that respect our shared rules and principles,” Koizumi said.
His message to others at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore was clear: Tokyo is ready to do more to boost growth and enhance security in the region. Japan is already working to provide increased military cooperation, information sharing and training to nations such as the Philippines and Australia, while offering US$10 billion in financial support to those in Southeast Asia to help with soaring crude oil prices driven up by the US-Israel war with Iran.
Beijing regularly bristles at Tokyo’s rising regional stature and often invokes Japan’s wartime history — and its own violent experience of occupation — to warn of any revival of its historic rival’s military power.
In a not-so-subtle reference, Koizumi alluded to China during his speech, saying: “There’s a country that has a huge arsenal of nuclear weapons and strategic bombers. Japan has neither of such weapons, and yet Japan is labeled ‘new militarism.’ Isn’t it strange?”
In contrast to that boldness, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth took a softer line on China. He repeated the phrase “constructive strategic stability” to describe Washington’s ties with Beijing — a slogan Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) put forward during a summit with US President Donald Trump. Hegseth also conspicuously avoided directly mentioning Taiwan in his speech, prompting praise from the Global Times, the tabloid mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist Party. That is an achievement no US official should aspire to.
The messaging discipline on Taiwan was notable, Ankit Panda, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace said on the sidelines of the forum.
“Hegseth showed up with the idea to not do anything to upend the new camaraderie between Xi and Trump. He stuck to the script,” Panda said.
I have been to several of these gatherings over the years, and while previous US administrations also had their missteps with Asia, there was at least an attempt to articulate a shared future. Not so for Hegseth, who instead called for a return to realism and signaled once more that Washington expects the region to shoulder more of its own security burden.
What Hegseth did not explain — and what no one in the Trump administration has adequately answered — is what US leadership actually looks like in a region being asked to do more for itself. If Asian nations are spending more on defense, are they doing so under a US umbrella, or quietly preparing for a world without one?
A former diplomat watching the speech told me it was “good enough” and that Asia should simply be happy the US was still in the room — but good enough is not great at a time of such geopolitical uncertainty. Many nations would be quietly alarmed by what the relative silence on Taiwan signals: An accommodation of Beijing that goes beyond pragmatism toward something closer to capitulation.
Notably, China did not send its defense minister to the forum for the second straight year, choosing to deploy a lower-level delegation instead. Koizumi’s willingness to call out Chinese military behavior, frame the region’s security as a collective project and lead the momentum for coalition-building among smaller Indo-Pacific states would be viewed as a genuine threat by Beijing.
While it has been in the works for several years, Japan’s elevation to the post of the region’s preferred stabilizer has received fresh momentum under Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi. Her government plans to raise defense spending from 1 to 2 percent of GDP by fiscal year 2027 to 2028, a historic shift in a nation whose postwar constitution limits military activity.
However, it is her position on Taiwan that has really irritated the Chinese. Last year in parliament, she said the nation’s future was “a survival threatening” situation for Tokyo, and her assessment is echoed by regional counterparts such as the Philippines. Bound by a common goal of deterring China’s “nefarious plans,” a reference to clashes with Beijing in the South China Sea, Manila is seeking closer ties with Taiwan, Vietnam and Japan, Philippine Secretary of National Defense Gilberto Teodoro said on the sidelines of the meeting.
Other nations worried about the US and China could be encouraged to join what Teodoro calls a new defense alliance. They should also quietly begin assessing their exposure to a potential Taiwan crisis. Along with the Philippines, Thailand and Indonesia have large numbers of citizens working there who could be caught up as potential refugees in a conflict.
None of this is to say that the US is withdrawing from Asia. Its military presence remains substantial and alliances are strong, but sometimes leadership is about the willingness to say the uncomfortable things out loud. Last weekend, that came from Japan.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the