As an academic with a background in public health, I have observed that in several fires, many of the victims did not die because they were trapped in the blaze, but because they “couldn’t move.”
It brings to mind that deeply ingrained series of Dr Ws (威瑪舒培) Cerenin (循利寧) commercials, in which a young girl’s grandmother is unable to move out of her chair because her legs have gone numb.
The advertisement also cruelly exposes the vulnerability of older people during sudden disasters — when crisis strikes, mobility is the only ticket to survival.
Mobility is the key to vitality. From a public health perspective, extreme crises such as fires, earthquakes or the outbreak of war are all stress tests for human survival.
Several cases in which people with limited mobility died in fires reflect a serious warning about public safety — in moments requiring emergency evacuation, even the rescue systems of the military, police and firefighters have their limits.
Only when individuals possess a basic level of physical strength and mobility can we reduce the burden on emergency responders and improve survival rates.
Preventing sarcopenia — the loss of skeletal muscle mass, strength and function due to aging — is the foundation to a resilient society. We should rethink the relationship between preventive medicine and national security, while promoting exercise and sarcopenia prevention among older people.
This is essentially about building a kind of comprehensive societal defense — citizens who possess basic mobility can remain self-reliant during power outages, communications breakdowns or emergency evacuations, and might even contribute to mutual aid within their communities rather than simply waiting helplessly for rescue.
Self-reliance and resilience can generate enormous marginal benefits. When every citizen maintains physical functional capacity by reserving their muscle strength, the nation can allocate its scarce rescue and medical resources more precisely, ensuring they go to those who are most vulnerable and in need.
This is not about spreading panic, but about building a society that is confident that, no matter what happens, we would be able to protect one another.
Lastly, investing in preventive medicine is tantamount to building a national resilience fund. Public health spending should not be viewed merely as welfare expenditure.
In a super-aged society, health promotion and the development of physical fitness are investments aimed at reducing the risk of future societal collapse.
In times of crisis, a healthy and independently mobile older population can transform from “those needing rescue” to “those capable of helping others.”
This is precisely the kind of social capital emphasized in the defense strategies of Nordic nations, such as Finland.
By promoting preventive medicine in ordinary times and helping older people avoid frailty and disability, we can protect not only the National Health Insurance system, but also the survival of every family in the face of extreme disasters.
Advancing preventive medicine is about ensuring that, in any challenge, people can retain their right to independence, health and dignity.
We must no longer allow physical immobility to become a source of tragedy — instead, allow the preservation of muscle and strength to become the most solid safeguard protecting Taiwan.
Su Hsun-pi is executive director of the Central Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In 40 years of watching politics, I have never seen anything quite like Taipei mayoral candidate Puma Shen’s (沈伯洋) breed of politician. He has a presence that commands attention, and a combination of qualities that appear to be the result of powerful political currents. What is it that makes Shen different? Throughout the past decades of local elections, I have not seen anyone seriously discuss a long-term vision for urban planning, let alone with the kind of clarity and insight that Shen possesses that compels people to keep listening. He is an exceptional storyteller, with an ability to present a vision
Taiwanese writer Chu Yu-hsun (朱宥勳) this month spoke out about the difficulties of judging literary competitions when nearly 40 percent of the novel submissions he reviews appear to be generated by artificial intelligence (AI). He said he would refuse to serve as a judge for any literary award that does not explicitly prohibit the use of AI in creative writing. The use of AI in creative and academic work has become increasingly common. My son, who attends National Chengchi University, says he is exasperated after working to complete assignments on his own, only to receive lower grades than classmates who used
China prefers to win without firing a shot in its bid to strangle Taiwan’s strategic autonomy. Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) would have approved. Its central tool at sea is the “cabbage strategy”: the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) layers fishing boats, maritime militia, coast guard cutters and warships around Taiwan’s contested waters in overlapping rings. Each layer normalizes daily coercion, narrows Taiwan’s freedom of movement and chips away at its maritime sovereignty — all while staying below the threshold of armed conflict. This is “gray zone” warfare at its most cost-effective — one of Beijing’s most promising
Freedom of expression is a precious gift from the times, civilization and history, Hong Kong writer Hon Lai-chu (韓麗珠) said on Wednesday last week when she received the Golden Tripod Award, the highest honor in Taiwan’s publishing industry, for her novel Flesh Mountain (祼山). “As a Hong Konger these days, I deeply feel that the freedom to write and publish should not be taken for granted,” she said. She said that for a reason. Hon, who rarely speaks publicly or accept interviews in Hong Kong because it could result in serious consequences, resigned from her long-running columnist post at the Chinese-language Hong
RSS