Drug tests need limits
The Ministry of Education plans to introduce rapid saliva drug testing in schools as early as September, aiming to address the challenge posed by emerging drugs such as etomidate, which are metabolized quickly and can be difficult to detect through traditional urinalysis.
It is a sign that the government is responding to drug-related risks on campus, and a commendable step. However, parental concerns should not be overlooked.
The concern is that if saliva testing requires student or parental consent, it might create a situation in which those willing to comply are tested, while those at highest risk slip through the cracks.
At the same time, ignoring proper consent procedures risks infringing on students’ privacy and bodily autonomy and might turn testing into a tool for stigmatization.
Campus drug prevention should not swing between loopholes and overregulation. It should establish a clear and trustworthy system.
Before implementing saliva testing, the government should, at a minimum, put three supporting measures in place.
First, establish a clear legal basis and conditions for implementation to prevent schools from requiring tests based on subjective individual judgments.
Second, ensure that trained professionals conduct sampling and communicate explanations, reducing conflict between teachers and parents.
Third, a positive rapid test result must not be treated as definitive proof of drug use; there must be mechanisms for confirmatory testing, notification, appeals and counseling.
Drug prevention in schools requires tools, but these cannot replace education and support.
The value of saliva testing lies in early risk detection, not in punishing students.
If the government can integrate family support, psychological counseling, social work intervention and addiction treatment — positioning testing as a gateway to support rather than a means of control — it should be possible to balance public safety, child protection and procedural justice.
Fan Chen-jia
Taipei
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
RSS