An amendment proposed by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Ko Ju-chun (葛如鈞) seeks to introduce exemptions to Taiwan’s restrictions on foreign ownership of public telecommunications networks.
Under the Telecommunications Management Act (電信管理法), foreign ownership of public telecom networks in Taiwan is capped at 49 percent direct ownership and 60 percent combined direct and indirect ownership unless otherwise approved.
Ko’s proposal would allow exceptions if the government determines that doing so would not harm telecom security, market development, national security or the public interest.
The amendment is widely viewed as an effort to facilitate Starlink’s entry into the Taiwanese market, amid reports the company prefers operating only through a wholly owned subsidiary.
That position is difficult to justify, given that Starlink operates through local partnerships in other markets.
In Japan, it works with KDDI and Internet Initiative Japan (IIJ), while in the Philippines it partners with PLDT Enterprise, Converge ICT and Globe Telecom.
Taiwan’s caution reflects credible security threats from China, including repeated damage to undersea cables. In a full-scale conflict, communications infrastructure would likely be an early target through physical and cyberattacks.
Satellite connectivity could provide important redundancy, especially in rural regions, outlying islands such as Kinmen, Lienchiang and Penghu, and remote territories including Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島) and the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙島). Ukraine’s use of Starlink demonstrates the value of low Earth orbit networks in maintaining wartime communications.
However, reliance on foreign systems raises concerns given Elon Musk’s past comments on Taiwan and Tesla’s exposure to China, including its Shanghai Gigafactory. China remains one of Tesla’s largest markets alongside the US and accounts for a substantial share of global deliveries, creating a strategic risk different from Ukraine’s experience.
Even if Starlink were operational in a crisis, concerns remain that Beijing could exert pressure to access data or communications. These risks underpin Taiwan’s strict foreign ownership rules for critical infrastructure.
Other low Earth orbit providers, including Eutelsat OneWeb and Amazon’s Project Kuiper, have indicated willingness to comply with local arrangements, though Amazon retains significant commercial ties to China through logistics and cross-border operations.
Given these constraints, Taiwan’s most secure long-term option might be developing its own low Earth orbit satellite system under domestic control, including the ability to restrict military access in wartime.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chen Su-yueh (陳素月) raised this idea at a meeting of the legislature’s Transportation Committee on April 22, stating that “Taiwan has many talented people, and we should develop our own low Earth orbit satellites to ensure our own safety.”
The Taiwan Space Agency (TASA) has expanded capabilities through Formosat and CubeSat missions. While still reliant on foreign launch providers, Taiwan is steadily building expertise in imaging, climate monitoring and satellite technology.
In cooperation with the Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology, TASA could accelerate development of commercial and military low-Earth-orbit satellite systems, providing a secure sovereign communications backup network.
Taiwan could still consider allowing Starlink entry, but any arrangement must comply with foreign ownership rules and be subject to strict oversight. In a conflict scenario, access would need to be tightly controlled or restricted.
Ultimately, Taiwan’s communications resilience would be best ensured through sovereign low Eart orbit satellite infrastructure.
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
RSS