When religion is fused with power, the line between “us” and “them” becomes a license for violence.
To understand the US today, we must start with an uncomfortable truth: The idea of God is no longer just a matter of faith — it is becoming a political weapon.
The erosion of liberal norms in the US is reshaping how power is exercised. What we are witnessing now is a more dangerous evolution: religion weaponized to justify that shift.
The Old Testament draws a stark moral boundary between “us” and “them.” Within the group, there is compassion, law and obligation. Outside the group, there can be conquest, expulsion and in some passages, genocide. Morality is bounded, and those boundaries define who counts.
The New Testament attempts to overturn this logic. Love your enemy. Turn the other cheek. Break the distinction between insider and outsider. Yet history offers a harsher lesson: Societies choose between these two systems. They do not reconcile them.
Nazi Germany made that choice with devastating clarity. It built an intense internal morality of loyalty and sacrifice for “Aryans” while systematically stripping Jews and others of their humanity. The structure was familiar: Morality within, none beyond. The language shifted — from “chosen people” to “chosen race” — but the logic remained intact.
Today, elements of US Christian nationalism are making a similar choice.
This is not the universalism of the New Testament; it is the selective morality of the Old Testament repurposed for modern politics.
The US is cast as a nation chosen by God. “Real Americans” are implicitly defined through cultural and religious identity, often white and Christian. Others — immigrants, Muslims and dissenters — are recast as threats.
US President Donald Trump is this trend’s clearest expression.
His rhetoric is undisciplined but also revealing. He threatens other nations with coarse language, frames conflicts in moral absolutes and invokes religious undertones to elevate politics into something resembling a sacred struggle.
At times, the performance collapses into incoherence — invoking phrases such as “Praise be to Allah” not as respect but as spectacle, exposing ignorance, emotionalism and a casual contempt for religion and diplomacy.
This is the breakdown of political language into identity-driven mobilization.
The deeper danger lies not in religion itself, but in how it is used. When leaders invoke God to decide who deserves empathy and who does not, empathy becomes tribal, violence becomes justifiable, because the other is cast as evil or less than human; institutions weaken, because those who claim to stand on God’s side no longer feel bound by restraint or self-reflection.
This is the logic that has underpinned some of the darkest chapters in modern history. For Taiwan, the implications are immediate.
The most dangerous miscalculation is to assume that the US remains a consistently rational, stable and values-based ally. If US politics continues drifting toward moral tribalism fused with religious nationalism, its foreign policy would become less predictable and it would be more willing to treat allies as instruments rather than partners.
The New Testament urges humanity not to divide the world into “us” and “them.” History suggests that this is precisely what humans do most easily.
When that division is sanctified in God’s name, embedded in state power and amplified by leaderssuch as Trump, it is no longer theology; it is geopolitics.
The concept of “God” is no longer something to be worshipped — it is something to be wielded.
Simon Tang is an adjunct professor at California State University, Fullerton, who lectures on international relations.
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng