North Korea is unique in turning a putatively communist state into a dynastic system now in its third generation. So while the proposition that Kim Jong-un’s teenage daughter would inherit power is sparking debate, unexpected political transitions are not entirely new.
On Monday, South Korea’s intelligence agency said that it had “credible” information that Kim Ju-ae is positioned as her father’s successor. Its briefing to legislators in Seoul followed appearances alongside her father highlighting her military credentials — including driving a tank — and months of rhetorical inflation, with state media describing her as “a great person of guidance.”
The Mount Paektu bloodline — linking the family to a sacred mountain seen as the mythical origin of the Korean people — is championed in North Korean propaganda. Yet, given that Ju-ae is around 13 and her father only 42, talk of succession appears wildly premature. Very little is known about her: Her exact age is uncertain; she might in fact be called Ju-hae — North Korean media does not name her; and she might have two siblings, possibly boys.
Many believe that the patriarchal norms of North Korea preclude her becoming leader, although a few women have senior positions, and that her inability to continue the (male) bloodline would be another obstacle.
They believe that her prominence has other functions, including softening her father’s image, preparing the ground for another family succession and grabbing more attention for North Korea’s military technology. The previous heirs were kept out of the spotlight for far longer. An older brother might be being groomed for leadership behind the scenes, protecting him and preventing split loyalties.
However, whoever takes over, North Korea is not simply a family dictatorship. The political system was built around those close to Kim Il-sung, the founding leader; their descendants still hold power and prosper from the economy too. The Kim family cult, signaling continuity and stability, has served the elite as a whole.
The reverence has inevitably waned over the generations. The repression imposed by the state persists, but its ability to provide for the people dissolved decades ago. Disaffected citizens have no way to challenge the brutal regime, but it is taking no chances: It has cracked down on foreign media which might allow young people to glimpse brighter possibilities outside the country (though recovering trade with China might provide some exposure). Recently, it has been strengthened by Russia’s need for arms and personnel for the war in Ukraine — which has also pushed China to bolster relations.
It is the exploitation and misery of millions of North Koreans that funds the comfortable lifestyle of the ruling families and the weapons programs which help them to survive.
In 2014, a UN commission of inquiry concluded that the leadership was committing abuses unparalleled in the modern world. Two-fifths of the population is undernourished and, within families, women receive less and worse-quality food. They have been hit particularly hard by tightened controls on markets. And parents of teenagers, including girls, are increasingly fearful of conscription, as growing numbers of school leavers are listed and soldiers are deployed overseas.
The prominence of one young girl would do nothing to help others. Ju-ae’s high profile is best understood not as a startling departure from the norm, but an affirmation and reinforcement of the grim status quo.
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
The ongoing Iran conflict is putting Taiwan’s energy fragility on full display — the island of 23 million people, home to the world’s most advanced semiconductor manufacturing, is highly dependent on imported oil and gas, especially that from the Middle East. In 2025, 69.6 percent of Taiwan’s crude oil and 38.7 percent of liquified natural gas were sourced from the Middle East. In the same year, 62 percent of crude oil and 34 percent of LNG to Taiwan went through the Strait of Hormuz. Taiwan’s state-run oil company CPC Corp’s benchmark crude oil price (70 percent Dubai, 30 percent Brent)