The announcement of a two-week ceasefire has allowed US President Donald Trump to hail the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz as a victorious dawn of a new golden age, but it is Iran that enters peace talks with the stronger hand.
The Tehran regime goes to the negotiations, set to start tomorrow in Pakistan, bloodied, but still intact. It still holds a stockpile of highly enriched uranium (the original crux of the conflict with the US, Israel and allies), and it claims at least part-control of the strait, having demonstrated its power to close the narrow waterway and hold the world to ransom.
Trump won instant gratification. He got to remain the central player in the drama, having terrified the world with his threat that “a whole civilization will die,” before claiming a few hours later to have dramatically reversed course and to be “far along” the road to an enduring Middle East peace.
Illustration: Mountain People
With the president’s words the oil price went down and global stocks showed signs of rallying, demonstrating he still had the power at least to move short-term markets.
However, the actual ceasefire terms remain hazy with varying interpretations in circulation. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said the ceasefire covered “everywhere including Lebanon,” but his Israeli counterpart, Benjamin Netanyahu, quickly contradicted him, vowing Israel’s campaign over its northern border would go on.
Trump said the ceasefire was contingent on the “complete, immediate and safe opening of the Strait of Hormuz.” Tehran agreed that shipping would now proceed through the waterway, but with the caveat that passage would be under the control of the Iranian armed forces.
Reports from the region suggested that Tehran planned to implement its earlier proposal to share control of the strait with Oman, and split the proceeds from tolls, set at US$2 million a ship. That would represent a significant departure from the prewar status quo, in which the strait was a free waterway, cementing Tehran’s role as gatekeeper and providing it with an entirely new source of income.
The uncertainty over the future of the strait suggests that the hundreds of ships trapped in the Gulf by the conflict would seek to leave, but far fewer would enter through Hormuz given the level of uncertainty for fear of being trapped. Shippers would also be anxious that paying tolls to Iran could violate US sanctions.
Trump made ever more grotesque threats in the five weeks of war, culminating in his genocidal warning that he would bring about the end of Iranian civilization, in the clear hope of blustering Tehran into last-minute concessions.
That does not seem to have worked. When it came to the wire it was Iran’s 10-point plan, not Trump’s 15-pointer, which was agreed as the starting point for talks in Pakistan. Trump, having rejected the Iranian plan out of hand the day before, called it “a workable basis on which to negotiate.” Iran’s 10 points include the lifting of all sanctions, the payment of war reparations, and the acceptance of Iran’s right to enrich uranium — all conditions that have up to now been beyond Washington’s red lines.
The Tehran government included the right to enrich in the Farsi version of the ceasefire terms, but not in the English translation, suggesting it was put there for domestic consumption as the regime boasted victory.
There seems little doubt that Iran would make that right a red line at talks over a long-term settlement, as it has in all its negotiations with the West, and its possession of 440kg of highly enriched uranium (enough in theory to make a dozen nuclear warheads) would be a powerful bargaining chip.
In negotiations that were ended by the US-Israeli attack on Iran on Feb. 28, Tehran was apparently ready to surrender that stockpile. That is just one way in which the US has emerged from the war in a weaker position than it was at the last round talks in Geneva, two days before the conflict was unleashed.
The Tehran delegation would arrive in Islamabad having shown the world and the Iranian people that the regime can survive the worst its enemies could throw at it, despite severe losses including the death of the supreme leader. Iranian forces remained in the fight at the time the ceasefire was declared, defying claims they had been obliterated, with missiles still being fired at Israel and other US allies.
The negotiations would also begin under the shadow of a new status quo, with Iran as co-custodian and beneficiary of the Strait of Hormuz. The US delegation might bang its fists and threaten to walk away over Iran’s conditions, but it would be in the knowledge that its adversary has the proven capacity to inflict exquisite pain on the Trump administration through its power over the petrol pump.
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
The ongoing Iran conflict is putting Taiwan’s energy fragility on full display — the island of 23 million people, home to the world’s most advanced semiconductor manufacturing, is highly dependent on imported oil and gas, especially that from the Middle East. In 2025, 69.6 percent of Taiwan’s crude oil and 38.7 percent of liquified natural gas were sourced from the Middle East. In the same year, 62 percent of crude oil and 34 percent of LNG to Taiwan went through the Strait of Hormuz. Taiwan’s state-run oil company CPC Corp’s benchmark crude oil price (70 percent Dubai, 30 percent Brent)