The world witnessed the preamble to a changing of the guard in space as four astronauts climbed aboard the Orion spacecraft built by Lockheed Martin Corp and awaited the countdown. They were launched on April 1 into space on a 10-day journey around the moon by the Space Launch System rocket — a NASA initiative led by Boeing Co, with help from Northrop Grumman Corp and Aerojet Rocketdyne.
Any space junkie would tell you, those companies are legendary players in the history of US space exploration. They were key contractors on the Apollo missions that landed astronauts on the moon beginning in 1969, allowing the US to win the space race against Russia and cementing the country’s status as the dominant superpower. After some 50 years, their time driving NASA’s space exploration appears to be ending.
However, although the legacy space companies all returned to play key roles in this mission, they would not be spearheading NASA’s ambitious seven-year, US$20 billion plan to build a permanent moon base. For that to happen, Boeing, Lockheed, and the others would have to figure out how to remain relevant in a new space market increasingly dominated by commercial interests instead of NASA’s budget. The drive to turn a profit means that the delays, the billions of dollars of budget overruns, and the structurally high per-launch costs that have plagued space programs in the past would no longer be tolerated.
The reconfigured Artemis program would require a steady cadence of launches from rockets and spacecraft that have much lower operational costs and can carry more payload. That future belongs to the producers of reusable rockets — led by Elon Musk’s SpaceX and with Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin scrambling to catch up. Other startups — Rocket Lab Corp and Stoke Space Technologies — are building reusable rockets, a technology that has lowered launch costs dramatically and which legacy space companies lack.
SpaceX, with its workhorse reusable Falcon 9 rocket, unlocked the secret to making money in space by launching more than 10,000 low-Earth-orbit satellites providing fast Internet for rural residences and any moving vehicle, whether ship, aircraft, or recreational vehicle. Blue Origin’s partially reusable rocket made its first commercial flight in November.
With profit margins in focus, there is an incentive for SpaceX and Blue Origin to be as efficient as possible — an essential ingredient to commercial space that has been lacking since NASA was created in 1958. The timing could not be better. The US racing with China to create a permanent base from which the moon’s resources of water and minerals can be claimed and tapped.
NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman has laid out a streamlined plan to return to the moon that contemplates a transition from the legacy companies to the commercial-space newcomers. NASA is scrapping Gateway — an expensive space station orbiting the moon that would have acted as a transition toward building a moon base. Instead, it is planning to land equipment and material to erect a base and search for moon ice and minerals. That would require a twice-a-year launch cadence.
The hardware is legacy as well. The Space Launch System, or SLS, is powered by the same engine design used on the Space Shuttle program, which was retired in 2011. The SLS rocket was supposed to end the US’ embarrassing dependency on Russia’s Soyuz rocket to send astronauts and cargo to the International Space Station. That nearly nine-year reliance on Russia was finally broken when SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon spacecraft carried its first crew to the ISS in 2020.
Lockheed’s Orion spacecraft has its roots in the Constellation program — a return-to-the-moon plan announced in 2004 under former US president George W. Bush and eliminated during the administration of former US president Barack Obama administration in 2010. Orion can orbit the moon but is not capable of landing there. A single moon launch of Orion on the SLS rocket is estimated to cost more than US$4 billion.
“The space ecosystem has been dramatically upturned by reusability,” said Jud Ready, the executive director of the Space Research Institute at Georgia Tech. The legacy space companies “are going to have to modify their operations.”
The SLS and Orion require a human landing system to take astronauts from Orion to the lunar surface. NASA has contracted with both SpaceX and Blue Origin to build these landers. This complex system would likely be streamlined in the future with a spacecraft that can reach the moon and land directly with astronauts aboard. A fuel depot in low-Earth orbit would be necessary to provide the energy needed for the long journey to the moon. These commercial space companies would have to prove their safety case for ferrying humans to and from the moon.
Counting on newcomers for NASA’s moon strategy comes with risk. SpaceX’s new Starship spacecraft would have to refuel in space to reach the moon and land — a capability that has yet to be tested. For the human landing system, SpaceX is building a version of the Starship spacecraft that is stripped of heat shields and navigational fins. It would still require in-space refueling to reach the moon. A lot can go wrong, and Musk has a reputation for setting overly optimistic technology timelines. NASA’s Isaacman said the agency would embed experts across the supply chain to head off delays and budget overruns.
The big advantage of Starship is that both the rocket booster and the spacecraft are recovered either on the launchpad or an ocean-faring drone ship and can be refurbished quickly and launched again. SpaceX has proven it can do this with the Falcon 9 — a rocket system that has been reused partially more than 430 times and has set a record of one rocket booster being flown more than 30 times.
Unlike the SLS and Orion, Starship does not depend solely on NASA to fund its development. SpaceX is cash-flow positive, with sales from its Starlink internet service.
Musk has a grand plan of using Starship to launch tens of thousands of data-center satellites that would be powered by tapping near-round-the-clock sun, which is more intense in space. Investors are excited about Starlink’s lead on satellite Internet and this data-centers-in-space opportunity, which is driving demand for an initial public offering of SpaceX even after it recently bought Musk’s xAI startup. This sale of shares could raise US$75 billion and value the company at US$1.75 trillion.
This 10-day trip around the moon is key to sustaining the Artemis program’s momentum, which hopes to land humans on the moon by 2028. The program would successful until NASA lets go of outdated hardware and adopts the recycling tactics of commercial-space newcomers.
Thomas Black is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist writing about the industrial and transportation sectors. He was previously a Bloomberg News reporter covering logistics, manufacturing and private aviation.This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS