US President Donald Trump’s NATO allies are increasingly resisting involvement in his Iran war, risking a deeper rupture in the already strained military bloc.
Spain closed its airspace to US jets on Monday, and Italy denied US military aircraft bound for the Middle East permission to land at a base in Sicily, according to a person familiar with the matter.
Poland said it has no plans to relocate its Patriot batteries, following a report that the US has suggested Warsaw consider sending one of its systems to shore up air defenses in the Middle East.
Trump on Tuesday posted on social media about his unhappiness with France’s refusal to allow planes carrying military supplies to use its airspace.
“The U.S.A. will REMEMBER,” he said.
European leaders have been walking a fine line since the US and Israel launched their war on Iran on Feb. 28. They hope to avoid antagonizing the US commander-in-chief and keep him from undermining Ukraine’s war effort against Russia.
After initially rebuffing Trump’s calls for help securing passage through the Strait of Hormuz, they have since coalesced around an offer to build a coalition to enforce freedom of navigation in the key passage after the end of active combat.
However, it was too late to avoid Trump’s fury. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio was softer behind closed doors at a G7 gathering last week in France, making no concrete demands and supporting this initiative, Bloomberg reported.
On Monday, he said the US might need to reassess its relationship with NATO after the Iran war and called the military alliance’s response to US action “very disappointing,” assailing partners in the NATO for denying access to military bases.
While the US initiated the war in Iran with little to no warning to allies, its offensive relies heavily on European territory — bases, ports and airspace. Yet European nations are neither willing to engage in the conflict directly nor do they have the political latitude to give Trump the support he wants.
Closing wide swaths of southern European airspace means bombers operating out of the UK would have to take a circuitous path to the Persian Gulf. That adds time and strain on flight crews and requires much more fuel, provided by aerial tankers. The US suffered a tanker mishap earlier in the war, when a KC-135 crashed in Iraq, killing all six crew members.
Europe has skin in the game when it comes to the vital Strait of Hormuz, which Iran closed with threats of retaliation after being attacked by the US and Israel. The critical passageway for energy supplies has been effectively shut since late February, leading oil and gas prices to soar.
The conflict is broadly unpopular across Europe, which is already reeling from an inflation surge stemming from the war. Leaders have sought to distance themselves from it, stressing that any military involvement so far has been purely defensive.
“We’re seeing evidence of confusion and tension between public opinion and political opinion in many NATO countries,” said Ian Lesser, distinguished fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the US.
“As a default, there is a tendency to be helpful in Europe regarding military-to-military cooperation with the US, but the current war is putting these longstanding defense relationships under strain,” he said.
The latest tensions add another layer of mistrust and lack of predictability to an already strained transatlantic relationship, he said, adding “even for those inclined to help, it reflects concern about what Europe is getting from having a more helpful posture or what the cost of opposition would be.”
A main focus of US anger has been Spain, which closed its airspace to US flights involved in Iran operations and blocked the use of US bases in Spain. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has been one of the most vocal critics of Trump among European leaders, accusing him of starting an “illegal” war.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer also faced harsh criticism from Trump after initially rejecting the president’s request to allow the US to access the UK’s military bases to help carry out strikes on Iran. The British government has since allowed the US to use bases for “limited defensive action.”
In a similar vein, Portugal has adopted a cautious stance on US use of the Lajes Air Base in the Azores, granting access under existing bilateral and NATO arrangements while emphasizing it is not a party to the conflict. Lisbon has restricted authorization to logistical support, including refueling and transit, rather than offensive operations, framing the move as consistent with domestic law and international obligations.
Portuguese Minister of Foreign Affairs Paulo Rangel said his country “will not be in this conflict,” adding that any authorization is limited to defensive, proportionate operations against military targets. No strike missions have been launched from the Azores, he said.
In the case of Italy, the ban on using bases in Sicily was not permanent, and relations with the US remained good, a person familiar with the matter said.
Italy denied the aircraft landing because the planes were already in the air once the request for combat use was made, the person added, leaving no time to discuss the matter in parliament.
“We have not registered any friction or issues with our international partners,” the Italian government said in a statement. “Relations with the US in particular are solid, and key to a full and loyal collaboration.”
In contrast to other allies, Romania has allowed the US to use its base there for logistics.
“Every country that joined NATO did so voluntarily; no one forced us,” Romanian Prime Minister Ilie Bolojan told France’s Le Figaro newspaper.
“A political divorce between the EU and America would be a catastrophe for the entire Western world,” he added.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz ruled out prohibiting the US’ use of its base in Ramstein, its biggest in Europe. An agreement signed after World War II guarantees the US’ use of the site as long as its operations do not violate national or international law.
That said, Merz, who has sought to cultivate a close relationship with Trump, has sharply criticized the US attack on Iran.
“What Trump is doing right now is not de-escalation and an attempt to find a peaceful solution, but a massive escalation with an uncertain outcome,” Merz said at a conference in Frankfurt last week.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
RSS