A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators and supporters of former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Sunday gathered on Taipei’s Ketagalan Boulevard to show support for Ko, who was last week sentenced to 17 years in prison on corruption charges. Their choice to rally for the founder of the Taiwan People’s Party on March 29 was particularly laughable.
The date holds special significance for the KMT, which designated it as Youth Day to commemorate the “72 martyrs” of the Second Guangzhou Uprising in 1911. The March 29 date is a misinterpretation of what was originally a lunar calendar date, when more than 72 people died in the failed uprising against the Qing Dynasty.
It was one of many battles in the broader context of the Hsinhai Revolution, which ended imperial rule. The fundamental spirit of that revolution — from the First Guangzhou Uprising of 1895 to the Wuchang Uprising of October 1911 — was not only a rejection of Manchu rule, but of the deep political corruption within the Qing Dynasty.
Pan-blue camp supporters might think that someone who identifies as Taiwanese dislikes or is unaware of the early revolutionaries of the Republic of China (ROC).
They are wrong.
Many Chinese revolutionaries of the era, such as Lu Hao-tung (陸皓東), Lin Jue-min (林覺民), Fang Sheng-tung (方聲洞), Chiu Chin (秋瑾), Huang Hsing (黃興) and Sung Chiao-jen (宋教仁) are worthy of respect, as is anyone who stands up against injustice and tyranny.
Lai Ho (賴和), a political activist regarded by many as the father of Taiwanese literature, once wrote that “a warrior fights for justice”; Lin Chiu-wu (林秋梧), a Taiwanese Buddhist monk and social activist, wrote of the importance standing with the weak to fight against the powerful. Such qualities are worth aspiring to.
Lu was beheaded after the first Guangzhou uprising. During his interrogation, the 29 year old said he was standing up to the “corruption and despotism of the Manchu government and the incompetence and cowardice of its officials.”
Lin Jue-min, a philosophy student who returned from Japan to stand up to Manchu corruption, was arrested and beheaded at the age of 24 following the Second Guangzhou Uprising.
In a farewell letter to his wife, he wrote: “The land is drenched in blood and the streets are thick with wolves and dogs... You understand my heart. After your tears, think of the people and be glad to sacrifice my life and your happiness for the eternal welfare of all people.”
Their indignation is worlds apart from the autocratic KMT regime that seized national assets, allowed rampant corruption and was responsible for countless deaths in Taiwan.
While the Tongmenghui (同盟會, “united league””) had patriots, the KMT that emerged from it was corrupt, such as former Executive Yuan secretary general Lin Yi-shih (林益世), who was convicted of accepting bribes while in office, and caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁), who has been accused of graft.
The list of KMT mayors, councilors and officials involved in corruption and bribery over the past two decades is too long to list.
Lin Jue-min did not tolerate the stench of inequality and wolves; Lu stood firm against corruption.
Today, the KMT mobilizes to support corrupt officials even on their self-designated Youth Day. The ROC revolutionaries would surely be turning in their graves.
Lee Hsiao-feng is an honorary professor at National Taipei University of Education.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
Taiwan no longer wants to merely manufacture the chips that power artificial intelligence (AI). It aims to build the software, platforms and services that run on them. Ten major AI infrastructure projects, a national cloud computing center in Tainan, the sovereign language model Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine, five targeted industry verticals — from precision medicine to smart agriculture — and the goal of ranking among the world’s top five in computing power by 2040: The roadmap from “Silicon Island” to “Smart Island” is drawn. The question is whether the western plains, where population, industry and farmland are concentrated, have the water and
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
RSS