Under continuous pressure from the opposite side of the Taiwan Strait, Taiwan’s sports teams are required to compete internationally under the name “Chinese Taipei.” Last week, during the Asian Football Confederation (AFC) Women’s Asian Cup held in Australia, former Taiwan soccer coach Chen Kuei-jen (陳貴人) — who was a Ministry of Sports advisory committee member for the women’s national team and head coach of the men’s national team from 2012 to 2016 — was removed from the venue for shouting “Go Taiwan” from the sidelines. Upon hearing the news, both athletes and citizens alike felt deeply aggrieved. In the course of conducting diplomacy, governments often face many unspoken hardships.
If our nation hopes to expand its diplomatic space, it cannot afford to be overly concerned with symbolic titles or formalities — instead, it must proceed with flexibility and pragmatism. This was true during the era of former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), and likewise during the time of former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝). It was also true under the administrations of former presidents Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), and must continue under President William Lai’s (賴清德) government. The success of pragmatic diplomacy relies on cooperation between the ruling and opposition parties, and unity of purpose from the highest to the lowest levels of government.
Therefore, most citizens should understand why, when traveling to the Tokyo Dome to cheer on the national baseball team, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) had to do as a “private citizen” and paid for at his own expense. First, it was to avoid causing any difficulties for the host government, and second, it was to prevent deliberate obstruction or complications from the Legislative Yuan. Anyone who keeps national interests in mind, sees issues from others’ perspectives and possesses empathy can appreciate both the approach and intent behind Cho’s actions.
If some are still questioning why Cho has not acknowledged the trip as an “official duty” and continue to nitpick the Executive Yuan over every little detail, then they no longer hold issue with Cho as a person — rather, they are questioning the pragmatic diplomatic practices followed by the Lai administration and are making things difficult for the Republic of China itself.
State affairs are difficult, and diplomacy is no easy task. The public has witnessed firsthand the merits and outcomes of Cho’s trip to Tokyo, and would ultimately render its own judgement.
Yao Meng-chang is an assistant professor in Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Postgraduate Legal Studies.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has
RSS