When US President Donald Trump boasted that he had stopped the conflict between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo) — though fighting persists in the DR Congo, at appalling human cost — he made clear that his goals went beyond a long-sought Nobel Peace prize.
“They said to me: ‘Please, please, we would love you to come and take our minerals.’ Which we’ll do,” the US president said.
Now he is following through. On Monday last week, he launched a new strategic reserve plan, “Project Vault,” worth almost US$12 billion. Two days later, US Vice President J.D. Vance hosted a summit seeking to create a trade zone for critical minerals.
The US — and others — are trying to counter the dominance of Beijing, which was far quicker to grasp the strategic importance of such resources. Key to its plan is a deal touted as a way to bring the DR Congo’s wealth and create incentives for peace. Few on the ground are convinced. The deal does nothing to help the DR Congo build processing capacity and requires it to freeze its tax and regulatory regimes for a decade. The EU likes to portray itself as taking higher ground, but in December last year, the parliament and council agreed to weaken key due diligence rules.
The incredible resources of the DR Congo have been violently plundered over centuries for the benefit of richer nations and a handful of individuals on the ground. Four-fifths of the population live below the poverty line. Extraction has meant exploitation and danger. The week before the Washington gathering, at least 200 artisanal miners were crushed to death or suffocated when a coltan mine in Rubaya in the eastern DR Congo collapsed. It became a tomb, one survivor said.
As the journalist Nicolas Niarchos writes in his new book, The Elements of Power, “tech profiteers, politicians, and battery-makers have made a trade-off: Cleaner power at home for pollution and suffering elsewhere.”
Meeting climate goals would require many times the current production of materials such as lithium and cobalt. However, environmental despoliation, the eviction of communities and the exploitation of laborers, including children, are not the inevitable results of the necessary shift away from fossil fuels. The non-governmental organization Global Witness suggests that Trump’s mineral-hunger is better explained by their use in military technology. Tantalum, extracted from coltan, is essential to jet engines and missiles, as well as smartphones and laptops.
Just as growing conflict helps to drive demand, so demand is fueling conflict. Rubaya is part of the swathes of land seized by M23 rebels in the eastern DR Congo in the past few years, with mines there generating an estimated US$800,000 monthly, funding the insurgency. The group is backed by Rwanda (although Kigali denies it) and experts say Rwanda is selling far more coltan than it can produce, with smuggling across the border reaching unprecedented levels. The EU minerals deal with Kigali has been rightly criticized.
Natural resources are increasingly intertwined with security policies across the continent via Russian private military companies, the US promise of peace brokering and China’s infrastructure-for-resources model, the African Policy Research Institute said recently.
Its report suggests that resource demand could give African states leverage to negotiate more equitable partnerships that benefit their populations. However, that depends on institutional strength, regional coordination and transparency in deal-making — as well as determination not to compromise human rights, environmental standards or national sovereignty, it said. The DR Congo’s example is not encouraging.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS