Oil smuggling has been so enormously profitable that no matter how many obstacles Washington and Brussels put up, the barrels kept flowing. With a daily turnover of US$1 billion, the black market has been just too attractive. However, for the first time, cracks are showing in the illicit business. Millions of barrels of unsold Iranian and Russian crude are accumulating in storage.
The reason is not just more US and European sanctions and political pressure. Sure, they have helped, but the key factor is more mundane: The buyers of sanctioned crude oil have plenty of alternative aboveboard barrels available — at reasonable prices. Playing by the rules carries a smaller cost.
Buyers of sanctioned oil, notably India and Turkey, have been switching with ease over the past 60 days to unsanctioned barrels. For now, that means any glut of unsold crude is being concentrated in the shadows of the black market, away from the limelight of the world’s top oil-price benchmarks: Brent, West Texas Intermediate and Dubai.
If anything, the switch has made the mainstream oil market tighter, putting a floor under prices. Add the risk of conflict in the Middle East, and the cost of a barrel has gone up 10 percent over the past two months. At US$63 or so for West Texas Intermediate, the price is still alluring enough to make buying illicit stuff not worth the bother.
The exact size of the black-market glut is difficult to ascertain. The stockpile, spread between onshore tanks and oil tankers at sea turned into temporary floating-storage facilities, is likely hovering at more than 100 million barrels. At current prices, even factoring in the discounts that traders offer for sanctioned crude, it is worth at least US$5 billion.
Kpler, a commodity-intelligence firm, puts the amount of Russian and Iranian crude in floating storage alone at 58 million barrels. It was 6 million early last year.
To understand what is happening, look at India, traditionally the largest buyer of sanctioned oil after China. At its peak New Delhi bought more than 2 million barrels of black-market barrels, first from Iran, then from Russia. Under pressure from the US and the EU, it stopped importing Iranian oil in 2019, and it has reduced its purchases of Russian crude.
Last month, India imported about 1.3 million barrels a day of Russian oil, down about 35 percent from the middle of last year. Despite US President Donald Trump saying that New Delhi had agreed to completely stop buying Russian crude, it would not do so in the short-term. Purchases would probably fall to 800,000-900,000 barrels a day this month and next month, less than half of the peak. For the US, that might be enough.
Indian refiners are buying non-sanctioned crude from all over: the Middle East, west Africa, Brazil, Guyana, the US and even Argentina. When I visited the country last month, refiners told me they had been surprised about how easy it had been so far to secure alternative supplies.
Sure, maybe replacing even more of the flow of sanctioned crude would prove more difficult, and, sure, there is a price to pay. Non-sanctioned barrels are still more expensive, but with crude hovering at about US$60 a barrel, instead of US$80 to US$100, the financial pain of switching is bearable. India and others would not shun the black market if regular oil was pricier.
It helps, of course, that Venezuelan crude is not sanctioned any more. That shifts 800,000 barrels a day from the black market into the regular market. India is already tapping some of that.
What comes next is crucial. For now, Russia and Iran have been able to keep pumping, even if some barrels go unsold, putting the surplus into storage. However, there is a physical limit to capacity. Using oil tankers as floating holding tanks gives them both extra time, but either they find new customers, or sooner or later they would have to reduce production.
The alternative is that Moscow and Tehran cut a deal with the White House to ease, or remove, the sanctions. We are still a ways from that.
China is the wildcard. Beijing already purchases about 95 percent of the crude that Iran exports, and about 60 percent of Russia’s. Put simply, this black market would not exist without China. It is a symbiotic relationship: Iran and Russia sell their product, keeping their war economies afloat and China secures energy at a bargain price, and significant political leverage in the Middle East and Moscow.
Last month Chinese refiners increased purchases of Russian crude to near-record levels, in part to offset their loss of Venezuelan oil. In theory, China can go further still, offsetting whatever barrels India and Turkey do not buy by storing them in its strategic petroleum reserve.
So Beijing’s next move would have profound implications for the global market. Decline to mop up the black-market glut and Russia and Iran would have to cut production, pushing up the crude price for everyone. Buy more illicit stuff and China could cut its purchases of non-sanctioned barrels, making more of them available and potentially forcing prices down. Not for the first time, Beijing finds itself in a position of influence over strategic resources.
Javier Blas is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering energy and commodities. He is coauthor of The World for Sale: Money, Power and the Traders Who Barter the Earth’s Resources. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS