The US has withdrawn from the WHO citing the agency’s mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic and failure to adopt reforms. It is estimated that tens of millions of people and trillions of dollars of revenue have been lost to COVID-19 globally.
While WHO officials continued to deny receiving an early warning from Taiwan, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Dec. 31, 2019, issued a statement saying that Taipei was already aware of seven infections in Wuhan, China, information it passed to the WHO, alerting it to possible human-to-human transmission.
It is undeniable that the WHO was cozy with China, which unfortunately lacks transparency and openness. The global health body not only ignored Taiwan’s serious warning, but also heeded Beijing’s requests and failed to act quickly to identify the origin of the virus. There is no accountability for the pandemic, not from China and not from the WHO, while business goes on as usual.
After so many years, the WHO remains comfortable with what it did or did not do for the world. Its actions cast doubt on its ability to safeguard global health by denying its failures and refusing to implement reforms, all while playing along with a superpower. The WHO can serve humanity better, only if it keeps politics out of science.
COVID-19 is one example of how a superpower such as China can ruin so many lives and livelihoods. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is another. The world needs to be alarmed whenever a superpower can turn against its own people. That brutality would not be limited to domestic abuses. The world has witnessed enough of the imperialism game.
Ukraine has been able to stand up against a superpower bully, with the help of middle powers through military support and economic sanctions. By holding off Russia on the military front, crippling Moscow’s war chest and bringing the war to Russia to give the aggressor a taste of its own medicine, Ukraine has shown that when the middle powers work together, they can counter superpower aggression.
The COVID-19 pandemic also demonstrates that a middle power such as Taiwan is crucial for humanity to uphold truth and safety.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said that when middle powers work together to counter the rise of great power rivalry, it is possible to build a more cooperative and resilient world. The economic and defense alliance of middle powers can and must uphold the value-based international order of human rights, sovereignty and democracy.
The rise of a new world order of middle powers is timely to help secure stability when the US is more inclined toward serving its own interests.
Meanwhile, China is purging its top military leadership as an economic depression devastates the lives of millions. A great human disaster is in the making, which could be worse than the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s and 1970s.
The principle of divide and conquer says to finish the war against Russia first, and then deal with the ramifications of a great financial meltdown and possible civil war in China. The resilience of middle powers might be their greatest asset for tackling worldly challenges.
James J.Y. Hsu is a retired professor of theoretical physics.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
RSS