During the public hearing convened on Thursday last week at the Legislative Yuan for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party bloc’s proposed impeachment of President William Lai (賴清德), Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Wang Yi-chuan (王義川) delivered an address in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese). Less than 30 seconds into his remarks, he was interrupted by the KMT’s Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), Sun Yat-sen School president, who demanded that Wang speak “Guoyu [國語, Mandarin Chinese]”. After a moment’s surprise, Wang said he had the right to use the language of his choosing, telling Chang that, “if you can’t understand it, go find an interpreter.”
Chang holds a doctorate in philosophy from the University of Hamburg in Germany. Yet, in the eyes of this so-called elite intellectual, Taiwanese are forever destined to be second-class citizens. Deigning to try and prevent a legislator from speaking Taiwanese, he is stuck in the Martial Law era. The incident has circulated online, evoking memories for many of being punished for “speaking dialects” in elementary school.
My parents are Taiwanese, and Taiwanese is my mother tongue. I was often subject to the NT$1 fines for speaking in Taiwanese in school. Back then, NT$1 was a lot of money. When I asked my parents for pocket money, they would usually give me NT$0.5, enough to buy five biscuits.
However, much worse than the NT$1 fines was having to wear a cardboard sign around your neck, mockingly called a “dog tag.” The sign would read: “I did not speak Mandarin today.” It was humiliating. I remember my deskmate in fourth grade being punished this way; she was a shy girl, and was too afraid to leave the classroom all day, even to go to the toilet. At 4pm, when everyone stood up for the flag-lowering ceremony, she suddenly wet herself. She was overwhelmed with shame, and I was frozen in shock. At 10 years old, with a mind full of questions, I began to sense that something was deeply wrong with the adult world.
More than half a century has passed, yet this scene remains clear in my mind. It is why, when I entered graduate school and my Taiwanese consciousness began to awaken, I was fully in favor of democracy pioneer and reverend Kao Chun-ming’s (高俊明) “A Declaration of Human Rights by the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan” in 1977, which called for Taiwan to become a new and independent country.
Chang might be full of a lofty moral rhetoric, but he is utterly steeped in the ideology of unification. Despite having lived in Taiwan for more than 70 years, he still neither understands nor speaks Taiwanese. He is the type that fancies himself a superior “Mainlander,” but is unwilling to integrate into the Taiwan in which he was born and raised. The arrogance of this Chinese mindset is akin to what the Taiwanese phrase refers to when it talks of beggars moving into a temple and driving out the temple keepers. He will not last.
Sophia Lee is a member of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
RSS