As we enter a new year, 2.13 million primary-school-aged children remain out of school in Afghanistan, while 2.2 million girls have been excluded from secondary education since the Taliban’s 2021 ban, part of a broader campaign to erase women from public life, but despite this egregious abuse of human rights, which UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in Afghanistan Richard Bennett has labeled “gender apartheid,” nations have begun resuming relations with the Taliban regime.
The UN mission to Afghanistan noted in a 2025 human rights report that the Taliban regime has intensified its restrictions on girls and women. International negotiations, including the Doha meetings hosted by the UN and Qatar, have made no progress on the matter, owing to the Taliban’s insistence on excluding women’s organizations from any talks and refusal even to discuss girls’ rights. Given this, it is hardly surprising that global mediators and the Taliban have not established a working group focused on female education.
Worse, restoring normal relations with the Taliban regime means relinquishing nations’ only leverage — international isolation, further diminishing prospects for restoring access to education. Russia in July last year became the first nation to recognize the Taliban government and restore full diplomatic relations — without securing any concessions on girls’ and women’s rights. This followed the Russian Supreme Court’s decision in April last year to remove the Taliban’s classification as a terrorist organization, allowing for closer security cooperation against the Islamic State affiliate in Afghanistan that attacked Russia in 2024.
Illustration: Tania Chou
China, for its part, accepted the credentials of an ambassador from the Taliban regime in January 2024, but stopped short of de jure recognition of the government, some key members of which remain under UN sanctions. That has not prevented China from pursuing closer economic ties with Afghanistan. Chinese companies have made significant investments in Afghanistan’s resource sectors. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) in August last year visited Kabul to discuss the nation joining the Belt and Road Initiative.
After Afghanistan’s falling out with Pakistan, previously the Taliban’s biggest supporter, in October last year, India upgraded its ties with the regime, including by formally reopening its embassy in Kabul. That same month, Afghan Minister of Foreign Affairs Amir Khan Muttaqi, a sanctioned official who required a travel waiver from the UN Security Council, visited India and proclaimed that “the future of India-Afghanistan relations seems very bright.”
Even more concerning, some European nations have increased engagement with the Taliban as part of a push to deport failed Afghan asylum seekers, lending credibility to the regime, despite its persecution of girls and women. This stands in stark contrast to the efforts to make gender apartheid an international crime, which in Afghanistan’s case would imply the imposition of further sanctions. The Pre-Trial Chamber of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in July last year issued arrest warrants for Haibatullah Akhundzada and Abdul Hakim Haqqani, two senior Taliban officials charged with gender-based persecution.
Despite this progress, outside powers have become less interested in confronting the regime, appearing to justify this, at least in part, by weak internal opposition. Whereas India, Iran and Russia backed forces that put the Taliban under real pressure in the 1990s, there is no organized armed opposition in Afghanistan at this time.
However, the US has taken a hostile attitude toward Afghanistan, which US President Donald Trump called “a hellhole” after an Afghan man killed two National Guard members. As a result, the administration has stopped issuing visas to Afghan nationals and vowed to re-examine every immigrant from Afghanistan who entered the nation under Trump’s predecessor, former US president Joe Biden.
Up until now, negotiations at the UN on gender apartheid in Afghanistan have focused more on advocacy than on binding agreements, although there have been calls to classify it as a crime against humanity. The 59th session of the UN Human Rights Council, held in June and July last year, debated this matter, and Bennett has persistently advocated referring such crimes to the ICC, making girls’ rights a condition for engagement with the Taliban and devising mechanisms to hold the regime accountable.
While no treaty amendments or sanctions have been adopted yet, the UN’s Sixth Committee (Legal) has advanced a draft global treaty targeting crimes against humanity. Further discussions about the treaty, expected later this month, should consider codifying gender apartheid as a crime under international law. Such a move would bolster efforts to pressure the Taliban. The UN Security Council, to its credit, has sought to do this in its briefings, but the UN system lacks a unified enforcement strategy.
Pressuring the Taliban to end its gender apartheid is not only a moral imperative; it is also a strategic one. Afghanistan’s population has swelled to more than 42 million and is only growing: Iran and Pakistan forcibly returned 2.6 million Afghan refugees last year alone. This huge influx has strained an already teetering economy, but escaping poverty would be impossible so long as the Taliban denies half its population the chance to be educated and join the labor force.
UN Assistant Secretary-General Kanni Wignaraja, the UN Development Programme’s regional director for Asia and the Pacific, put it best: “The primary issue facing Afghanistan’s economic future” is girls’ and women’s rights.
“That is the issue that will kill the country, economically, socially, politically,” she said.
Gordon Brown, a former British prime minister, is WHO ambassador for global health financing.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
RSS