A female student, surnamed Lin (林), at a junior-high school in New Taipei City in 2023 asked a male student, surnamed Kuo (郭), to kill a male student, surnamed Yang (楊), who was stabbed to death with a switchblade.
After the court’s second ruling, Yang’s parents said one judge asked them if it was acceptable for the killers to show them “filial piety” as a form of atonement.
The court said that the presiding judge had been changed.
During the proceedings before the trial, the offenders’ lawyer applied to the previous judge for “restorative justice,” inquiring whether Yang’s family would accept any form of compensation, the court said, adding that the previous judge did not force the Yang’s parents to accept it.
The public’s doubts have continued to mount: Is it reasonable for a judge to propose that “the killers show filial piety toward the victim’s parents”? Under normal circumstances, the proposal would not be deemed reasonable or appropriate. However, the discussion of the case should not be confined to criticizing the judge’s remarks, as it also involves three dimensions: the moral, emotional and legal aspects.
From the legal aspect, the punishment imposed on the offender are typically criminal liability and civil compensation. The former refers to imprisonment and corrective measures, while the latter refers to paying for medical expenses, emotional damages and support losses. The law does not mandate the offender to build familial or caregiving relationships with the victim’s family, nor does it demand filial piety from the offender.
One reason for that is because forcing emotional obligation would likely cause additional harm. The victim’s family might be unwilling to accept it, and the offender might not be sincere, so it is just for show.
From the moral and mental aspects, the victim’s family can hardly trust the person who killed their loved one, let alone form an affection for them. Forced interaction might worsen their trauma, mourning and grief.
In this case, Yang’s family said the judge was overly idealistic. Not only did they not think that the offender would show filial piety toward them, but they were also in a panic, with Yang’s father saying: “It would already be a blessing if the offenders do not come and kill us.”
Offenders should atone through confession, punishment and compensation, so they could gain true awareness of their wrongdoing. As long as the offender has not sincerely remedied his crime and the victim’s family remains fearful, we should not invoke “restorative justice.” The victim’s family should not be asked whether it is acceptable for the offenders to atone by showing filial piety toward them, so that they would not be hurt again. Otherwise, it would inevitably raise doubts about whether restorative justice merely means reduced sentencing.
Is restorative justice really possible? Its main goal is to help the offender understand the harm they caused to the victim, and then to discuss together how to remedy the fault through dialogue. In Yang’s case, this step was absent or undisclosed.
The media reported that the offenders showed no regret and even threatened witnesses. Their actions were far from the principles of restorative justice.
Restorative justice involves dialogue, apologies and understanding each other’s emotions, and it must be conducted on the basis of willingness, respect and safety. The goal is to understand and heal the victim’s or their families’ trauma, not making the offender take the victim’s place.
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just