China Airlines recently flew its first-ever flight of all-male flight attendants. Elsewhere, Taiwan’s armed forces have all-female tank crews. Although these appear to be isolated anomalies, they reveal a loosening of long-held social assumptions about gender-defined occupations.
Such a shift should symbolize progress, allowing people to pursue careers based on their interests and abilities. However, the wave of sarcasm and mockery that followed online suggested that there is still a long way to go before true workplace equality is achieved.
Although there was no shortage of supportive voices on social media, there was still excessive scrutiny aimed specifically at gender.
Some questioned whether an all-male cabin crew could deliver sufficiently attentive service, while others doubted the ability of female thankers.
It seems that those who pursue careers that run counter to societal gender expectations must first overcome the “gender” barrier to prove their competence.
When the public’s first instinct is to look at someone’s gender rather than performance, it becomes clear how deeply gender stereotypes are embedded in workplace culture — and how they build a high wall that separates and confines people.
When discussing gender equality in the workplace, an invisible barrier is often overlooked: occupational sex segregation. Why is it that, when certain professions are mentioned, a particular gender immediately comes to mind? It is not simply a matter of innate talent, but the result of long-term social construction.
Such segregation occurs in two ways.
First is horizontal segregation, where a specific gender is steered toward certain industries or positions. For example, there is an assumption that men should serve as tankers, while women should be flight attendants.
Second is vertical segregation, where senior positions are disproportionately occupied by one gender within the same industry, or the “glass ceiling.”
If we are to pursue true workplace equality, we must stop presuming a person’s competence based on their gender. These barriers must be dismantled from education to recruitment, allowing talent to circulate on the basis of professionalism rather than gender.
Whether it is women serving as tankers to defend the nation or male flight attendants providing warm-hearted services, those who push through traditional boundaries remind us of a simple truth: What limits development has never been gender, but rather the lack of imagination.
I look forward to a day when society no longer filters talent through the lens of gender, but focuses purely on people’s passion and expertise. When that day arrives, we would naturally embrace the most attentive flight attendants in the cabin and the most competent tankers — regardless of their gender.
Su Yi-hua is a graduate student in Tunghai University’s Department of Social Work.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
RSS