In response to Premier Cho Jung-tai’s (卓榮泰) decision on Dec. 15 not to countersign amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) and other bills passed by the Legislative Yuan, the blue and white bloc accused President William Lai (賴清德) of “dictatorship” and “constitutional violations.” As legislators, they have the constitutionally enshrined right to call a vote of no confidence to check the power of the premier, but they shrink from using it. If passed, such a vote would force the premier to resign, and the president to dissolve the Legislative Yuan and call new elections — something, it seems, that the opposition would rather not do, preferring to cling to their seats.
The collapse of Germany’s coalition government in February last year could provide a reference point for how a no-confidence motion and early elections could be held to seek a renewed public mandate. The German parliament elected in 2021 was meant to serve a full term until September. However, the Bundestag in February held snap elections, seven months short of the full term.
The reason was simple. Then-German chancellor Olaf Scholz of the Social Democratic Party, leader of the coalition government, in late 2024 found himself at loggerheads with then-German minister of finance Christian Lindner of the Free Democratic Party over budgets, borrowing and taxation.
Cooperation was no longer possible, Scholz said, before announcing that he would fire Lindner on Nov. 6, 2024, with the pair publicly trading accusations and assigning blame.
Scholz’s announcement came just hours after news broke of US President Donald Trump’s victory in the 2024 US presidential election, a moment of deep political uncertainty globally. Scholz understood that Germany could not afford to exhaust its political energy with internal conflicts, and that public opinion sought a reset of parliament now that his governing coalition was in the minority.
His original calculation was to push through several key bills before later proposing a motion of no confidence, ostensibly to avoid dissolving parliament right before Christmas and disrupting the holiday atmosphere.
However, sensing a shift in public sentiment and the urgency of the situation, Scholz ultimately proposed the motion on Dec. 11 that year, triggering the collapse of his government. The elections that followed allowed a new government to form with an updated mandate from the public.
This same constitutional right to seek a no-confidence vote is well within the arsenal of Taiwan’s blue and white-camp legislators, who claim to disagree so resolutely with Cho’s refusal to countersign legislation. Why do they not use it?
The only plausible conclusion is that they are uncertain of the results and would rather deliberately drag Taiwan into internal strife while hanging on to their seats in parliament. Their greed and unwillingness to stand the test of public opinion means they are entirely undeserving of respect and incapable of earning trust.
Liou Uie-liang is a medical worker and author based in Germany.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
RSS