Path back to normalcy
Taiwan’s democracy, often celebrated as a beacon in Asia, faces a profound constitutional crisis. An escalating standoff between the Constitutional Court and the legislature over judicial thresholds and appointment powers has exposed the fragility of its institutional balance. While the court’s judgements sought to maintain order, the resulting friction suggested that judicial shortcuts might deepen national divisions.
In an era of intense polarization, the true challenge for any supreme court is not only to declare what is unlawful, but to guide constitutional organs back to their proper functions. When a mere five-justice quorum can issue final rulings on monumental issues, the boundary between the “rule of law” and “judicial activism” becomes dangerously blurred, fueling public skepticism and legislative retaliation.
At the heart of the dispute lies the question of decisionmaking thresholds. Raising the thresholds is not inherently unconstitutional; higher consensus leads to more stable precedents. The real danger stems from legislative gaps — such as the lack of an automatic vacancy-filling mechanism — that leave the state paralyzed when appointments are obstructed.
A more constructive path exists: the principle of “time-limited correction.” Instead of invalidating procedural reforms outright, the court could acknowledge the legislature’s authority to set higher thresholds, while simultaneously requiring lawmakers to remedy potential dysfunctions within a timeframe.
Such a “guided ruling” would compel political actors to return to their duties, focusing on closing institutional loopholes instead of indulging in zero-sum partisan confrontation. It would transform a political battlefield into a process of constitutional renewal.
The role of a constitutional court is not to become a combatant in political wars, but to act as a guardian of the framework. Only through such statesmanship can Taiwan’s democracy be protected from paralysis and its institutions be bolstered for the future.
Davy Lu
Primary school teacher Hsinchu County
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS