Taiwan’s democracy has entered deep waters and is facing mounting geopolitical risks. The issue is no longer over a contest for parliamentary seats between the blue, green and white camps, but China’s war on Taiwan, targeting its constitution, democracy and defenses.
In the past few years, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has shifted toward an “attack from within” strategy. In light of this, Taiwanese society must avoid descending into an emotionally charged war of words, and calmly examine the current state of parliamentary chaos from an institutional and national security perspective.
First, we must examine the structural risk of weaponizing constitutional tools. In mature democracies, impeachment and budget reviews are instruments of oversight or checks and balances. However, these tools are being unwisely used to hollow out executive authority, paralyze the judicial system, drain central government finances and undermine defense autonomy.
These risks are already manifesting in the CCP’s “united front” strategy against Taiwan, which has shifted from an early stage of economic infiltration toward a new chapter of legal and cognitive warfare. Its core objective is to, through proxy actors, attack the six central pillars of Taiwan’s democracy: administrative efficiency, judicial independence, legislative order, fiscal stability, self-defense autonomy and social trust.
Second, we must examine the current calls for impeachment as a means of political decapitation. Ever since Hualien County strongman and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崐萁) paid a visit to the CCP’s top official in charge of Taiwan policy, Wang Huning (王滬寧), his actions and behavior within the party have clearly been aimed not at safeguarding democratic rule of law, but at destroying Taiwan’s democratic systems from within. The motion to impeach President William Lai (賴清德) as a form of political decapitation, therefore, is just the latest addition to a series of acts of institutional sabotage.
According to research — including a 2019 study by the V-Dem Institute at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden — Taiwan has, over many years, consistently been ranked as the democratic country most severely impacted by foreign disinformation in the world. This is not just a matter of interference in information flows, but infiltration at a deeper, structural level.
There is evidence that over the past 20 months, political and economic exchanges between Taiwan and China have become increasingly directed by China. Legislative proposals raised by Fu and other senior KMT officials following visits to China have repeatedly aligned with the CCP’s ambitions to undermine Taiwan’s military defenses, fiscal resilience, and international economic and trade cooperation.
These “gray zone” attacks leveled by means of parliamentary procedure carry a higher level of threat than any neighborhood military exercise. They leverage democratic openness to seek to turn Taiwan’s own legislature into something tantamount to a party branch of the CCP.
Finally, we must consider what Taiwan can learn from other nations in defending democracy. In 2018, Australia passed its Espionage and Foreign Interference Act precisely to address Chinese infiltration into its political and academic spheres. Its experience shows us that legal measures can serve to require representatives of foreign interests to disclose their funding sources and operational networks.
In addition, Ukraine’s social unity in the face of foreign threats is a source of real inspiration. Defending democracy is not just the responsibility of the military, but also of civil society. We must be vigilant against politicians who make noises about safeguarding democracy, but whose actions instead seem to seek a restoration of authoritarianism. When they shout about imperialism and dictatorship, we must apply sober reasoning and legally scrutinize their behavior: Would their proposals make Taiwan stronger, or do they make it more fiscally and militarily dependent on foreign powers?
After decades of struggle to throw off the Chinese authoritarian system of the KMT, Taiwan succeeded in establishing a democratic way of life and a sovereign, rule-of-law state. We cannot allow CCP authoritarianism — or its domestic proponents — to use the fruits of our democracy to destroy its very foundations.
What we are facing is a war without gunpowder. We call on Taiwanese to unite in their national identity, resist falling into the authoritarian trap of nationalism, and firmly uphold Taiwan’s core values of sovereign independence and free democracy.
Resistance to the CCP’s “united front” tactics in Taiwan is not in opposition to democratic oversight — it is in opposition to those seeking to sell out the country in the name of said oversight. Only when the integrity of the legislature is safeguarded and the safety net of Taiwan’s democracy is rebuilt could the nation’s sovereignty and democratic way of life remain resilient amid the CCP’s comprehensive internal and external assault.
Chen Tsai-neng is a spokesperson for Taiwan Society East.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
RSS