Taiwan’s democracy has entered deep waters and is facing mounting geopolitical risks. The issue is no longer over a contest for parliamentary seats between the blue, green and white camps, but China’s war on Taiwan, targeting its constitution, democracy and defenses.
In the past few years, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has shifted toward an “attack from within” strategy. In light of this, Taiwanese society must avoid descending into an emotionally charged war of words, and calmly examine the current state of parliamentary chaos from an institutional and national security perspective.
First, we must examine the structural risk of weaponizing constitutional tools. In mature democracies, impeachment and budget reviews are instruments of oversight or checks and balances. However, these tools are being unwisely used to hollow out executive authority, paralyze the judicial system, drain central government finances and undermine defense autonomy.
These risks are already manifesting in the CCP’s “united front” strategy against Taiwan, which has shifted from an early stage of economic infiltration toward a new chapter of legal and cognitive warfare. Its core objective is to, through proxy actors, attack the six central pillars of Taiwan’s democracy: administrative efficiency, judicial independence, legislative order, fiscal stability, self-defense autonomy and social trust.
Second, we must examine the current calls for impeachment as a means of political decapitation. Ever since Hualien County strongman and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崐萁) paid a visit to the CCP’s top official in charge of Taiwan policy, Wang Huning (王滬寧), his actions and behavior within the party have clearly been aimed not at safeguarding democratic rule of law, but at destroying Taiwan’s democratic systems from within. The motion to impeach President William Lai (賴清德) as a form of political decapitation, therefore, is just the latest addition to a series of acts of institutional sabotage.
According to research — including a 2019 study by the V-Dem Institute at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden — Taiwan has, over many years, consistently been ranked as the democratic country most severely impacted by foreign disinformation in the world. This is not just a matter of interference in information flows, but infiltration at a deeper, structural level.
There is evidence that over the past 20 months, political and economic exchanges between Taiwan and China have become increasingly directed by China. Legislative proposals raised by Fu and other senior KMT officials following visits to China have repeatedly aligned with the CCP’s ambitions to undermine Taiwan’s military defenses, fiscal resilience, and international economic and trade cooperation.
These “gray zone” attacks leveled by means of parliamentary procedure carry a higher level of threat than any neighborhood military exercise. They leverage democratic openness to seek to turn Taiwan’s own legislature into something tantamount to a party branch of the CCP.
Finally, we must consider what Taiwan can learn from other nations in defending democracy. In 2018, Australia passed its Espionage and Foreign Interference Act precisely to address Chinese infiltration into its political and academic spheres. Its experience shows us that legal measures can serve to require representatives of foreign interests to disclose their funding sources and operational networks.
In addition, Ukraine’s social unity in the face of foreign threats is a source of real inspiration. Defending democracy is not just the responsibility of the military, but also of civil society. We must be vigilant against politicians who make noises about safeguarding democracy, but whose actions instead seem to seek a restoration of authoritarianism. When they shout about imperialism and dictatorship, we must apply sober reasoning and legally scrutinize their behavior: Would their proposals make Taiwan stronger, or do they make it more fiscally and militarily dependent on foreign powers?
After decades of struggle to throw off the Chinese authoritarian system of the KMT, Taiwan succeeded in establishing a democratic way of life and a sovereign, rule-of-law state. We cannot allow CCP authoritarianism — or its domestic proponents — to use the fruits of our democracy to destroy its very foundations.
What we are facing is a war without gunpowder. We call on Taiwanese to unite in their national identity, resist falling into the authoritarian trap of nationalism, and firmly uphold Taiwan’s core values of sovereign independence and free democracy.
Resistance to the CCP’s “united front” tactics in Taiwan is not in opposition to democratic oversight — it is in opposition to those seeking to sell out the country in the name of said oversight. Only when the integrity of the legislature is safeguarded and the safety net of Taiwan’s democracy is rebuilt could the nation’s sovereignty and democratic way of life remain resilient amid the CCP’s comprehensive internal and external assault.
Chen Tsai-neng is a spokesperson for Taiwan Society East.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS