Friday last week’s attack on Taipei’s metro system was shocking and heartbreaking. Such violence not only harms lives, but also shakes public trust in the safety of shared spaces. Every person deserves the basic rights of safety, dignity and freedom from fear. Public transportation should be a place of security — not a source of terror.
Last Friday evening, I happened to be on the Bannan Line, relieved that I had not gotten off at the two stations where the attack occurred. After finishing work related to a Constitutional Court ruling, I began checking news updates to confirm what had happened and whether safety alerts were needed.
During the whole weekend, social media algorithms flooded my feed with close-up footage of the assailant. I did not click on any of them, yet the images kept coming.
Watching these scenes felt deeply unsettling. Eventually, I decided to turn off social media and television news for a while.
In Haruki Murakami’s non-fictional work Underground, victims often expressed feeling ignored by society. Media attention shifted quickly to the perpetrators and the cult, while the suffering of ordinary commuters faded into the background.
In moments like this, empathy and responsibility matter more than ever. Privacy must be respected.
Exposing victims’ medical histories only causes secondary harm. Scapegoating specific communities or groups is dangerous and unjust. Spreading unverified information fuels panic and misinformation. Media and social platforms should stop repeatedly broadcasting violent footage.
Such images risk triggering copycat behavior, and deepen the trauma for victims and their families.
For those feeling anxious from constant news coverage or online speculation, it is alright to take a break. Turn off the TV, step away from social media, and allow space to breathe.
Warmth and trust are what society needs most right now. Public spaces must be safeguarded, and genuine care extended to those affected — everyone deserves to move through the city without fear.
Chiu E-ling is the executive director of Amnesty International Taiwan.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS