Minister of Health and Welfare Shih Chong-liang (石崇良) has spoken against offering coverage under the National Health Insurance (NHI) program to the elderly parents of Chinese spouses who move to Taiwan. Some people have said that, given the annual application cap of 60 recipients, the net economic impact is minimal. What Shih is speaking to is not the number of applicants or recipients to the scheme, but the inherently unfair nature of the policy, in two ways:
First, Article 7 of the Constitution of the Republic of China stipulates that “all citizens of the Republic of China, regardless of sex, religion, race, class, or party affiliation, shall be equal before the law.”
This principle of equality is designed to “guarantee
substantive equality in legal status for all people, which requires matters that are the same in nature to be treated the same and not be subject to arbitrary different treatment without justification.”
The problem is that under the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), once a Chinese spouse obtains Republic of China nationality, their parents, if aged 70 or older, may move to Taiwan, obtain household registration, and become eligible for NHI after six months. However, the parents of spouses of every other nationality are not extended the same chance. This is a clear violation of the constitutional guaranteed principle of equality.
Second is the issue of contributions. Suppose a 70-year-old parent of a Chinese spouse moves to Taiwan and joins the NHI scheme. Their standard monthly premium of NT$826 over 20 years from the ages of 70 to 90 would amount to about NT$200,000. Let us compare this to a Taiwanese citizen who was born in Taiwan and has worked and paid taxes until the age of 90. Assuming standard premiums of NT$826 per month while they are children under 22 under their parents’ plan and after retirement at 60, and a personal monthly NHI contribution of NT$457 during their working years under the monthly minimum wage of NT$29,500 — as of Jan. 1 next year, this would amount to slightly more than NT$720,000 over 90 years. Is it fair for a Taiwanese citizen to contribute more than three times the amount as the spouse’s parent who moves here after retirement age?
The parents of Chinese spouses who have access to NHI through this scheme are, by definition, elderly, at a stage in life where individuals are most dependent on NHI, and their net healthcare expenditures would likely far outweigh their contributions. Beyond fiscal sustainability, there are concerns about the capacity of the healthcare system and national security.
Yeh Yu-cheng is a civil servant.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS