During his trip to China, French President Emmanuel Macron discussed with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) issues of crucial importance for the future of the international community.
The first issue — felt most acutely across Europe — relates to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the identification of a diplomatic avenue through which to contain a conflict ongoing since 2022. The European position is unequivocal: As the principal partner of the Russian aggressor, Beijing possesses negotiating leverage unmatched by any other actor in today’s international community.
Consequently, the EU as an institution and its member states deem it necessary to encourage China to play a decisive role in steering the Kremlin toward a peace decision, following the extensive devastation and loss of life caused by its military campaign in Ukraine.
The support that Beijing provides to Russia’s military apparatus — via dual-use materials such as microchips, drone technologies, optical systems — has proved essential in sustaining the fighting on Ukrainian territory.
It is therefore not accidental that Macron raised the issue of peace in Ukraine with such urgency during his meeting with Xi, given the crucial role Beijing is capable of playing in the continuation and in the potential resolution of the conflict.
China holds a “decisive capacity” to influence a ceasefire in Ukraine, Macron emphasized during his meeting with his Chinese counterpart in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing.
The Russian-Ukrainian conflict, he said, falls within those “divergences that sometimes exist in relations between France and China,” but which — according to Macron — “must be overcome for the common good,” as this constitutes a “responsibility” of both nations.
It is clear that the French president seeks to represent not only his own nation, but also the EU in its engagement with Beijing. Referring to divergences that must be overcome for the “common good” signals an intention to exercise leadership within the European framework, articulating to the Chinese leader the concerns of European countries regarding the continuation of the war in Ukraine — and other matters as well.
As for the latter matters, another major topic of discussion is the trade deficit that defines relations between the EU and China. Here too, the French president assumed the role of a European leader, conveying to his Chinese counterpart the desire — shared across EU member states — to rebalance the trade relationship with Beijing.
In this context, Macron compared the present situation to that of the last century, albeit with the roles reversed. “The Chinese have to do in Europe what the Europeans did 25 years ago by investing in China,” he said in an interview with the financial newspaper Les Echos upon returning from his state visit to China.
The message is clear: The trade deficit with Beijing, amounting to 306 billion euros (US$359 billion) last year, is no longer sustainable for an EU that seeks to move beyond the passivity and inertia in which it has long been mired, and to lay the foundations for greater competitiveness — economically and on the global geopolitical stage.
“We recognize that they are very good in some areas. But we can’t be constantly importing,” Macron stated clearly, before turning to an issue of major relevance for the EU’s future — one that its member states increasingly perceive with urgency: the risk of Chinese economic hegemony driven by investment flows.
“Chinese investments in Europe must not be predatory, by which I mean in pursuit of hegemony and creating dependencies,” Macron said, once again spelling out the EU’s position on how commercial relations with Beijing must evolve, in line with the derisking approach that has become a cornerstone of the European Commission’s policy framework.
Macron’s approach aligns with the expectations of those who fear the consequences of failing to reduce Europe’s economic and technological dependence on Beijing.
Yet the need for a basic unity among EU member states makes the realization of this goal far more complex — particularly given Hungary’s opposition to adopting a firmer, less accommodating foreign-policy line toward China.
Budapest has effectively chosen to “bet” on China, operating under the assumption that Beijing will emerge as the winner in any escalation of strategic competition with the EU. Many hope that a change in the country’s leadership — should Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban be defeated at the polls next year — could open the door to a genuine shift.
However, for the time being, this remains only a supposition, pending confirmation in the event of a genuine electoral reversal.
Michele Maresca is an analyst at Il Caffe Geopolitico, an online international law journal, and the Geopol21 think tank.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030
RSS