Sat, Dec 13, 2025 page7

• Why Thailand and Cambodia keep fighting the same war

  • By Karishma Vaswani / Bloomberg Opinion
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Renewed hostilities between Thailand and Cambodia are a wake-up call for Southeast Asia about the costs of letting historical border disputes fester. The century-old conflict, rooted in colonial-era cartography, is flaring at a moment when the region is already under strain from US President Donald Trump’s trade war and intensifying great-power rivalry between the US and China.

  Fighting erupted over the weekend along their shared frontier and so far has killed at least 11 people. Both sides have exchanged artillery fire, and Thailand carried out air strikes with F-16 jets after accusing Cambodia of firing rockets into civilian areas.

  The neighbors have clashed repeatedly before, most recently in July, when dozens were killed and tens of thousands displaced. A fragile ceasefire — brokered in part with Trump’s self-touted involvement — has collapsed, and there is no clear diplomatic off-ramp in sight.

  Washington has said it is concerned by the continued clashes and casualties along parts of the 800km border. Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged both sides to immediately cease hostilities and to return to the measures outlined Oct. 26 in the Kuala Lumpur Peace Accords, which were one of Trump’s more prominent successes in branding himself a global peacemaker.

  However, a return to calm looks unlikely, at least in the near term. Both governments are leaning on deeply rooted nationalist sentiment to shore up support at home. The rhetoric lays the groundwork for a prolonged and destructive conflict.Like many disputes in Asia, this one is a hangover from Western imperialism, though the roots go back further. The once-powerful Khmer Empire declined and what was left was in the process of disappearing, nibbled away for centuries by the ascendant Siam in the west and what is now Vietnam in the east. In colonizing Indochina, France made “the land in-between” a protectorate in 1863 and expanded its shrunken frontiers. Siam, now Thailand, remained independent in the face of heavy pressure from France and Britain, which ruled to the west over Burma and India.

  A Franco-Siamese treaty signed in 1904 proposed the frontier would follow the watershed line of the Dangrek Mountains. Another map produced by French officials in 1907 deviated from that, placing key landmarks, including the 11th-century Preah Vihear temple, on the Cambodian side. Thailand later said the map was never properly approved, while Cambodia maintained it was binding because Siam did not formally object at the time.

  In 1962, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled in favor of Phnom Penh, a decision it reaffirmed in 2013. The surrounding border area was never fully demarcated, laying the groundwork for recurrent tensions.

  The danger this time is how much more firepower is being used. Thailand’s forces are far larger and better equipped; the country is a longstanding ally of the US. Much-poorer Cambodia fields a smaller military and relies on Chinese assistance.

  The risks of escalation cannot be overstated. The 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations has historically avoided wading into the affairs of other members because of its policy of non-interference. However, fighting between two member countries cannot help but be of concern, and as it intensifies, voices within the region are calling for stronger intervention. This year’s chair, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim of Malaysia, says he is ready to help, as he did with the Trump deal, and is urging de-escalation. His efforts are sensible, but ultimately insufficient.

  It is a longstanding complaint, but the bloc has to stop managing crises and start resolving them. Installing an independent observer mission along the border and creating a mechanism to verify and publicly report violations would be a start toward real accountability. ASEAN states have already been involved in monitoring the ceasefire, but that is a long way from enforcement.

  Resolving the border dispute would be even harder. It would need buy-in from both governments. Any demarcation process should be conducted by neutral surveyors, anchored in the ICJ rulings. Bangkok and Phnom Penh would need to commit publicly to accept the outcome, and refrain from inciting nationalist sentiment.

  This would not be easy. There are compelling domestic incentives for both sides to let the fighting continue. Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul is using the conflict to tap nationalist sentiment before an election that could come as early as 2026.

  Cambodia’s most influential politician, Hun Sen, has exploited the violence to more closely reassert himself in politics, portraying himself as a national defender. That is a role he has played many times since starting his climb to power in the Vietnamese-backed regime that toppled the genocidal Khmer Rouge in 1979.

  It should not require Trump, although he says he plans a new peacemaking phone call. However, until Southeast Asia confronts its unresolved borders with real determination, the war over a line on a map is going to remain a recurring threat the region can no longer afford.

  Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Taiwanese lose status after obtaining single-use Chinese passport

  • 2

    KMT chair to meet with Xi, but at a price: source

  • 3

    Jeers as Real Madrid fall 2-1 to Man City

  • 4

    Taiwanese tourists go viral in video during Japan quake

  • 5

    US vows deterrence ‘through strength’