I always dispute the assertion that we are living through a new Cold War.
I suggest looking at Italy’s Years of Lead for inspiration instead.
The Years of Lead occurred during the 1970s, which saw a huge rise in politically motivated violence across democracies. Kidnappings, bombings, assassinations, and other crimes almost unheard of before then, such as plane hijackings and hostage crises, became rampant, and on a massive scale.
Most were committed by terrorist groups with far-left ideas, but many were the work of far-right extremists who were opposing them. Some would perform “false flag” operations to pin the blame on their enemies, increasing the tension. Law enforcement agencies and governments often played ambiguous roles, sometimes attempting to manipulate or hide facts rather than outright protecting citizens.
In 1980, a bomb exploded in Bologna train station, killing 85, the deadliest terrorist attack in Italy’s history to date. For decades it was thought to be caused by far-left terrorists, until it was revealed to be the work of neo-fascists. Italy’s own intelligence services were later shown to have concealed information and tried to suppress the investigation, feeding suspicion that state actors were entangled in the violence they claimed to fight. This is a typical Years of Lead story.
The result of such events was a depressing, heavy mood falling over the public. This was the point: a “strategy of tension” in which people would lose hope and confidence in their democratic institutions and societies.
Radio Free Europe reported that Russian sabotage operations in Europe have quadrupled since 2023, with cases of arson some of the most difficult to track down to their state backers. A couple of months ago, a fire at an Ikea store in Lithuania last year was finally linked to Russian military intelligence. The only point in burning down a furniture store is to scare the public. Similar attacks have been conducted in Poland, Germany, France, and beyond, by Russian or Belarusian actors, always on targets with zero military or political value, such as department stores and retailers. Alongside that, there is jamming of GPS signals for civilian airliners: What purpose does it serve beyond undermining the feeling of safety among European citizens?
The Years of Lead was mostly the work of domestic terrorists with little to no input from foreign powers. Although the Stasi or KGB or even NATO organizations (look up Operation Gladio for some fascinating reading about the CIA’s involvement) occasionally had their hand in, the Years of Lead was mostly about domestic criminal organizations such as the Baader-Meinhof Gang in Germany, the Red Brigades in Italy or the Weathermen in the US, rather than foreign agents.
Although many perpetrators, particularly in the US, are still radicalized homegrown actors, foreign powers such as Russia and China are replicating these methods, with direct engagement far greater than the Soviet Union’s involvement.
Political violence and shootings on famous figures, perpetrated by gunmen with weird and blurry ideological backgrounds, are typical of a Years of Lead scenario: You are not even sure what these shooters stand for, but you can feel it is extreme and scary. They choose targets that seem incongruous with their beliefs, and the more you read about it the less you understand what is going on. It is confusing, it is violent, it is chaotic, but that is the point: You are not supposed to understand, you are just supposed to feel alienated and, if not terrified, at least despondent or even outright desperate. Bonus points if you fight with your family about it over a holiday dinner.
For the most part, that tension is created by state actors replicating the means and goals of the Years of Lead with terrifying efficiency. The lead is slowly shot into the bones of society, weighing it down.
Disinformation and smart use of social media play a role, including in radicalizing more violent actors. The endgame is the same: an essentially psychological warfare in which violence is the cynical tool used to rot collective minds, but not an end in itself.
“Gray zone” warfare is not new. We faced it once before, and we should remember. If you really need to look into the past for clues, do not focus on the Cold War. What you are going through are the new Years of Lead.
Julien Oeuillet hosts the weekly program Taiwan vs The World on Radio Taiwan International and is a co-producer of TaiwanTalks on TaiwanPlus.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS