I always dispute the assertion that we are living through a new Cold War.
I suggest looking at Italy’s Years of Lead for inspiration instead.
The Years of Lead occurred during the 1970s, which saw a huge rise in politically motivated violence across democracies. Kidnappings, bombings, assassinations, and other crimes almost unheard of before then, such as plane hijackings and hostage crises, became rampant, and on a massive scale.
Most were committed by terrorist groups with far-left ideas, but many were the work of far-right extremists who were opposing them. Some would perform “false flag” operations to pin the blame on their enemies, increasing the tension. Law enforcement agencies and governments often played ambiguous roles, sometimes attempting to manipulate or hide facts rather than outright protecting citizens.
In 1980, a bomb exploded in Bologna train station, killing 85, the deadliest terrorist attack in Italy’s history to date. For decades it was thought to be caused by far-left terrorists, until it was revealed to be the work of neo-fascists. Italy’s own intelligence services were later shown to have concealed information and tried to suppress the investigation, feeding suspicion that state actors were entangled in the violence they claimed to fight. This is a typical Years of Lead story.
The result of such events was a depressing, heavy mood falling over the public. This was the point: a “strategy of tension” in which people would lose hope and confidence in their democratic institutions and societies.
Radio Free Europe reported that Russian sabotage operations in Europe have quadrupled since 2023, with cases of arson some of the most difficult to track down to their state backers. A couple of months ago, a fire at an Ikea store in Lithuania last year was finally linked to Russian military intelligence. The only point in burning down a furniture store is to scare the public. Similar attacks have been conducted in Poland, Germany, France, and beyond, by Russian or Belarusian actors, always on targets with zero military or political value, such as department stores and retailers. Alongside that, there is jamming of GPS signals for civilian airliners: What purpose does it serve beyond undermining the feeling of safety among European citizens?
The Years of Lead was mostly the work of domestic terrorists with little to no input from foreign powers. Although the Stasi or KGB or even NATO organizations (look up Operation Gladio for some fascinating reading about the CIA’s involvement) occasionally had their hand in, the Years of Lead was mostly about domestic criminal organizations such as the Baader-Meinhof Gang in Germany, the Red Brigades in Italy or the Weathermen in the US, rather than foreign agents.
Although many perpetrators, particularly in the US, are still radicalized homegrown actors, foreign powers such as Russia and China are replicating these methods, with direct engagement far greater than the Soviet Union’s involvement.
Political violence and shootings on famous figures, perpetrated by gunmen with weird and blurry ideological backgrounds, are typical of a Years of Lead scenario: You are not even sure what these shooters stand for, but you can feel it is extreme and scary. They choose targets that seem incongruous with their beliefs, and the more you read about it the less you understand what is going on. It is confusing, it is violent, it is chaotic, but that is the point: You are not supposed to understand, you are just supposed to feel alienated and, if not terrified, at least despondent or even outright desperate. Bonus points if you fight with your family about it over a holiday dinner.
For the most part, that tension is created by state actors replicating the means and goals of the Years of Lead with terrifying efficiency. The lead is slowly shot into the bones of society, weighing it down.
Disinformation and smart use of social media play a role, including in radicalizing more violent actors. The endgame is the same: an essentially psychological warfare in which violence is the cynical tool used to rot collective minds, but not an end in itself.
“Gray zone” warfare is not new. We faced it once before, and we should remember. If you really need to look into the past for clues, do not focus on the Cold War. What you are going through are the new Years of Lead.
Julien Oeuillet hosts the weekly program Taiwan vs The World on Radio Taiwan International and is a co-producer of TaiwanTalks on TaiwanPlus.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS