At about this time last year, Sweden began distributing a new edition of its civil defense brochure, In Case of Crisis or War. The mobilization and response of the Swedish public and the international community over the past year has been reflected in the Ministry of National Defense’s newly released civil defense handbook.
In 2014, Russia used military force to annex the Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine. Recognizing the move as a warning sign, the Swedish government reinstated conscription less than three years later in 2017, meaning all Swedish citizens aged 18 to 70 — regardless of gender — can be called up for selection and military service. To revitalize its long-dormant civil defense system and boost defense resilience, it also updated its civil defense brochure in 2018.
Then, on Feb. 24, 2022, Russia launched a full-scale military invasion of Ukraine.
The Swedish government has been distributing its civil defense brochure for many years. The first edition was issued during World War II and it has undergone five updates over the past 80 years — although the version released seven years ago was particularly prescient.
Sweden reinstated conscription and updated its civil defense handbook in light of Russia’s military developments. Its foresight and action in the face of crisis were validated by Russian President Vladimir Putin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, proving that the Swedish government had anticipated the situation and prepared for a deteriorating global environment. Confronted with the most urgent threat to national security since World War II, Sweden began distributing the latest edition of its civil defense brochure in November last year.
Aside from pre-existing content covering water, power outages, and evacuation and shelter procedures, the newest version also includes sections on cyberattacks and identifying disinformation.
The primary purpose of a civil defense handbook is to raise public awareness of potential crises and threats. Distributing printed materials is the most economical and effective method of promotion, and it also serves as a strategic countermeasure and deterrent against foreign hostile forces.
After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Swedish government repeatedly reminded its citizens that armed conflict could reach its borders and that every Swede must prepare for war. The number of visits to Sweden’s online air-raid shelter map soared 35-fold, and downloads of the older edition of the civil defense brochure rose ninefold — clear signs that Swedes remain vigilant in times of peace and are applying information from the latest civil defense brochure.
Sweden’s latest civil defense brochure has become a model for other nations, with neighboring Finland, Norway and Denmark all following suit. In September, Poland released an update new edition of its Safety Handbook. A few days later, 19 Russian drones crossed into Polish airspace. Polish fighter jets and NATO allies scrambled and shot down multiple drones, marking the first time the alliance downed enemy aircraft in a member state’s airspace and demonstrating that crises are never as distant as some might imagine.
Even so, a small number of Swedish politicians have ignored or even undermined the necessity of civil defense. In April 2022, former Swedish integration and gender equality minister Nyamko Sabuni — then leader of the Liberals party — said of a potential Russian invasion: “If it gets any worse, we will drive over to Norway.”
Sabuni’s remark triggered an uproar, and the backlash forced her to resign and permanently withdraw from politics. Likewise, Taiwanese society must not tolerate politicians who mock the nation’s civil defense handbook.
Chen Yung-chang is a freelance writer based in Taipei.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic