Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators have proposed caning as a punishment for online scammers. As many as 92 percent of respondents in a poll said fraud in Taiwan is severe, and more than 70 percent said they support following Singapore’s example by using caning as a deterrent.
The Ministry of Justice and the Judicial Yuan said that caning contravenes the personal freedoms outlined in the Constitution, and is inconsistent with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
Promulgated in 653, the Tang Code with commentary defined five types of punishments — beating with a light bamboo cane, beating with a heavy stick, penal servitude, exile and execution — which were inherited by successive dynasties.
Following the example of European and US criminal law, the code viewed corporal punishment as a violation of human rights, and thus abolished the five traditional punishments. That laid the foundation for what would become Article 33 of the Criminal Code, which defines the five main punishments — the death penalty, life imprisonment, imprisonment of more than two months but less than 15 years, short-term imprisonment and fines.
In the early years of the Republic of China, insufficient judicial funding made it impossible to establish nationwide prisons, and the abolition of corporal punishment led to a rapid increase in offenders. Many believed that Western-style prisons treated inmates too leniently and failed as an effective deterrent. In 1914, then-president Yuan Shikai (袁世凱) reinstated caning and exile as punishments.
While the KMT’s proposal is well-intentioned, the Criminal Code outlines several serious crimes, and applying caning solely to online scammers would result in many gaps. In a populist atmosphere, the public might demand that caning be applied to crimes such as drunk driving, drug offenses, sexual assault, child abuse and child pornography. In that scenario, caning would inevitably become the sixth principal punishment under the Criminal Code.
If the focus is only on responding to individual offenses rather than solving the root of the problem, such a measure could cause more harm than good.
In 1935, a special chapter on “rehabilitative measures” was added to the Criminal Code. The judicial resolution justifying the addition stated that the Criminal Code would mandate educational compulsory labor to toughen prisoners’ bodies and minds, instill good life habits and equip them with skills to earn a living, thereby eliminating criminal thinking. Academics at the time widely regarded this to be the most valuable improvement to the Criminal Code.
Unexpectedly, the then-Council of Grand Justices (now known as the Constitutional Court) in 2021 issued Interpretation No. 812, which said that educational compulsory labor “infringes upon the due process of law and the principle of proportionality as outlined in Article 8 and Article 23 of the Constitution respectively” and abolished the system entirely. The reasoning was baffling, and legislators were given no opportunity to make corrections — it could likely be the reason behind today’s rampant expansion of fraud rings.
The opposition parties’ proposal to reintroduce caning undermines the overall structure of the Criminal Code. The Constitutional Court should take responsibility for this outcome.
The law should promptly be amended to reinstate educational compulsory labor as a rehabilitative measure. That would safeguard the nation and ensure public security.
Chao Hsuey-wen is an assistant professor and holds a doctorate in law from Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more