Taiwan’s cosmetic medicine market has developed rapidly in recent years, but behind the glamorous packaging and commercial rhetoric lies a critical risk that is little known to the public — large numbers of “direct-entry” physicians, doctors who lack clinical training and emergency care experience, are entering the field.
This is not a normal flow of medical personnel, but the result of a major loophole that formed within Taiwan’s physician training system as a result of previous reforms to medical education. If the law is not amended in time to correct this, it would continue to endanger patient safety, erode medical professionalism and leave society to bear the costs.
In 2013, Taiwan’s seven-year undergraduate medical education program was shortened to six years, with the original seventh year clinical internship being replaced by the two-year post-graduate clinical training program, which had previously lasted for one year. However, because regulations at the time did not explicitly prohibit physicians who had not yet completed post-graduate training from performing medical procedures, anyone who obtained a medical license could be directly hired by medical institutions. Among the first cohort of six-year medical school graduates in 2019, some physicians who had never undergone post-graduate clinical training went straight into cosmetic medicine. This created the phenomenon of “direct entry” cosmetic surgeons.
The issue with these direct-entry cosmetic surgeons is that, up until graduation, they have never actually worked on the front lines of clinical care — they have not learned to identify danger signs in the emergency room, nor have they gained experience managing bleeding or infection, using anesthesia or responding to sudden complications. They have never trained in obstetrics or gynecology, pediatrics, surgery or internal medicine. They lack practical experience in the complexities of medical practice, yet they are nevertheless permitted to perform invasive medical procedures such as injections, liposuction and phototherapy — all of which could lead to shock or serious injury. This poses a significant risk to medical safety and quality.
An additional side effect of this is that these physicians are drawn to the high salaries offered by cosmetic clinics, which contributes to severe shortages in obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, internal medicine and rural healthcare. This creates an abnormal siphoning of medical personnel and undermines the overall medical ecosystem.
The direct-entry phenomenon is an abnormality in the medical system caused by an incomplete regulatory framework. In this context, the Ministry of Health and Welfare this month announced draft amendments to the Regulations for Using Specialized Equipment for Medical Examinations (特定醫療技術檢查檢驗醫療儀器施行或使用管理辦法). The revisions include different qualification criteria for physicians performing cosmetic surgery depending on risk, and would require new physicians to finish two years of post-graduate training to qualify as cosmetic surgeons. This is not some sort of punishment, but rather a correction of the loophole left over from earlier reforms to medical education.
Cosmetic medicine is a medical practice, and the gap between a doctor being able to perform a procedure and being able to take responsibility for it lies in the clinical competencies built through post-graduate training. Only by ensuring that every new physician entering the field of cosmetic medicine has completed full clinical training could Taiwan’s cosmetic medicine industry return to its medical foundations, rather than continuing to slide into a chaotic state characterized by high risks and commercialization. We support amending the law to seal this institutional loophole, as it is an essential step to protect patients, uphold medical professionalism and restore fairness in the medical system.
Huang Sue-ying is the founder of Taiwan Women’s Link.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS