After the passing of Japan’s 2015 security legislation, which expanded the role that the Japan Self-Defense Forces can play overseas, it has remained unclear whether a “Taiwan contingency” would constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival” — important because this would warrant mobilization for “collective self-defense” purposes under the legislation. The strategic fog has been lifted.
Japanese lawmaker Katsuya Okada asked Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in parliament whether a Chinese blockade of the Bashi Channel between Taiwan and the Philippines would constitute a “threat to Japan’s survival.”
“If there is a naval blockade, that would indeed constitute a survival-threatening situation,” Takaichi responded.
This is the first time that Takaichi has made the explicit link between a Taiwan contingency and a potential Japanese existential crisis.
The real flashpoint occurred the next day, when Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) in a now-deleted post on social media wrote that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The threat, beyond being an overt violation of diplomatic norms, was a clear provocation to Japanese security. However, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs has defended Xue’s post as a legitimate response to Takaichi’s dangerous signals to “Taiwan independence forces,” which has only exacerbated the situation.
In response to the post, the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs lodged a protest, and Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara condemned it as “extremely inappropriate.”
On Tuesday last week, a panel of Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party passed a resolution urging the government to take firm action, including declaring Xue persona non grata, if China failed to address the issue. US Ambassador to Japan George Glass also spoke out, calling the post a “threat” to Takaichi and all other Japanese, adding that Xue is “not so much a wolf warrior as an untrained puppy.” Earlier this year, the US Department of State also reaffirmed the importance of its cooperation with Japan on security in the region.
The threat against Takaichi was more than a slip of the tongue — it was a descent from the civilized to the barbaric. When opposition parties made a weak call for Takaichi to withdraw her remarks over “survival-threatening situations,” she refused, saying that “the government’s position is unchanged.”
Japanese Minister of Defense Shinjiro Koizumi emphasized that Japan must make judgement calls responsibly based on all available information. Okada’s question was intended to test Takaichi’s boundaries, and it spotlighted a historic shift in Japan’s security strategy — former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe’s warning that “a Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency” appears to carry official weight.
Within less than a month of taking office, Takaichi has drawn a clear red line for Japan’s security. Xue’s outburst has only brought the Japan-US alliance even closer, and any force with a mind to change the “status quo” in East Asia would be wise to tread lightly.
Japan’s strategic shift symbolizes that Taiwan’s security is now integrated into Japanese decisionmaking on what constitutes a “survival-threatening situation.”
As democracies, the best defense against “wolf warrior” threats is clarity. Xue’s incendiary rhetoric has, no doubt inadvertently, contributed to a new and emerging East Asian security order — one in which a Taiwan contingency is now also a contingency for the Japan-US alliance.
Wang Hui-sheng is a founding member of the East Asian Research Institute.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030
RSS