A report released on Monday by the Washington-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies warned that Taiwan must urgently reduce its dependence on imported energy, which China could exploit through “gray zone” tactics to force political concessions.
The report said that if Beijing succeeded in constricting Taiwan’s liquefied natural gas (LNG) supply, the nation could lose up to 50 percent of its power grid capacity. Such a shock would force Taiwan into a stark choice: maintain power for essential civilian infrastructure, or sustain industrial production, particularly in strategic sectors such as semiconductors.
The report urged Taiwan to improve energy resilience by diversifying LNG supply chains, expanding and decentralizing energy storage, reconsidering nuclear power, improving public-private cooperation to protect critical infrastructure, and engaging in joint cybersecurity training.
This year’s referendum on restarting a nuclear power plant failed due to a low turnout, suggesting a lack of broad social consensus on the nuclear issue, despite growing concerns about energy security.
Given the constraints, Taiwan must accelerate efforts to diversify its power grid. Even without the threat of Chinese coercion, the rapid expansion of the semiconductor industry is placing immense strain on the grid. The demand would only grow as artificial intelligence drives new energy-intensive investments, including data centers.
Taiwan has pursued energy transition since the first term of former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), but progress has been hindered by practical and political obstacles. Geographic constraints and extreme weather limit where renewable and conventional infrastructure can be built. Bureaucracy and local opposition impede development in areas that are technically viable, while grid limitations and supply chain challenges slow installation even where conditions are favorable.
The government should move decisively to remove bureaucratic barriers and address local resistance through targeted incentives and investment. Energy infrastructure requires massive spending, but treating such investment as a matter of national security — rather than simply environmental policy — would help mobilize resources more effectively.
Public concerns about wildlife, fisheries and coastal ecosystems could be addressed through smarter design. Taiwan could adopt wind turbines with slower rotation speeds and higher visibility to reduce harm to birds and bats; place geothermal systems and LNG terminals in locations that avoid fish habitats; and install solar panels on rooftops and brownfield sites to avoid conflict with agricultural land. Increased investment in eco-friendly technology would help reconcile environmental protection with energy development.
Russia’s systematic targeting of Ukraine’s power grid has shown how energy systems can be weaponized. There is little doubt that Beijing would attempt similar tactics against Taiwan. For this reason alone, Taiwan should prioritize decentralizing and diversifying its grid using a broad mix of renewable and conventional energy sources rather than engaging in polarized debates over which technology should dominate.
Improving storage capacity is equally critical. Taiwan could expand the use of lithium-ion battery systems for overnight storage and develop long-duration storage in mountain caverns or at secure coastal sites. Such facilities would stabilize renewable output and buffer the system against disruptions.
Taiwan should also make “gray zone” coercion riskier for Beijing by clearly signaling that blockades or disruptions to shipping would be considered acts of war. If the US, Japan and other partners made similar declarations, China would find it difficult to apply pressure under claims of legal or non-escalatory action.
Taiwan must prepare for the very real possibility of a blockade. Improving energy, food and communications resilience is essential. Failure to prepare could leave the nation vulnerable to coercion long before help could arrive.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) said on Monday that it would be announcing its mayoral nominees for New Taipei City, Yilan County and Chiayi City on March 11, after which it would begin talks with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) to field joint opposition candidates. The KMT would likely support Deputy Taipei Mayor Lee Shu-chuan (李四川) as its candidate for New Taipei City. The TPP is fielding its chairman, Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), for New Taipei City mayor, after Huang had officially announced his candidacy in December last year. Speaking in a radio program, Huang was asked whether he would join Lee’s
RSS