Indonesia’s decision to honor former president Suharto as a hero is a stark reminder that authoritarianism’s appeal endures in Southeast Asia. Enabled in part by a younger generation that might not fully grasp the dangers of autocratic rule, this collective amnesia threatens hard-won democratic gains.
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto — Suharto’s former son-in-law — on Monday last week posthumously awarded him the title of National Hero, the country’s highest civilian honor. It is a recognition typically reserved for citizens who have made extraordinary contributions to the nation. Previous presidents, including Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and Joko Widodo, had considered the move, but ultimately declined.
This willingness to whitewash history is reflective of a broader trend across the region.
Illustration: Mountain People
The announcement provoked outrage from human rights groups, but perhaps more striking was the relatively muted public response. In a country famous for street protests, there were no mass demonstrations. That is a sharp contrast to the student-led uprising that brought down Suharto’s regime (known as Orde Baru, or New Order) in 1998, and the more recent Gen Z protests over a slowing economy and perks for politicians.
Suharto presided over more than three decades of military-backed rule, an era marked by rapid economic growth, but also corruption, cronyism and human rights abuses. His government, backed by a brutal army, controlled the press, and jailed or disappeared political opponents.
His rehabilitation today is remarkable.
“This is part of how we honor our predecessors — especially our leaders who, despite everything, made extraordinary contributions to the nation,” Indonesian Secretary of State Prasetyo Hadi said.
Indonesia has form when it comes to rewriting history. I grew up in Jakarta during the years of the dictatorship, and by then the historical sanitization was fully entrenched.
Suharto’s regime glossed over the 1965-1966 anti-communist massacres, framing them as killings committed by ordinary civilians, rather than the army. Restive provinces such as Papua and Aceh were depicted as rebellious, rather than victims of military suppression.
In that dominant narrative, Suharto was not dictator, but “Bapak Pembangunan,” the father of development. To be fair, he did bring about strong economic growth, but that was built on shaky foundations, corroded by nepotism and profiteering. By 1998, the Asian Financial Crisis exposed the fragility of the system, and his power collapsed, plunging the country into economic and political turmoil.
The ensuing chaos is one of the reasons many Indonesians view the Suharto era as a time of stability, despite its many problems. Citizens of all ages remember his era fondly, the authors of a study on authoritarian nostalgia released last year said. They might also be less likely to support democratic institutions.
Prabowo has tapped into that sentiment. A former special-forces commander accused of human rights abuses (allegations he denies), he recast himself during his presidential campaign as a cute and cuddly grandfather, an image that resonated with younger voters born after the dictatorship ended. Since taking office, Prabowo has shown flashes of the New Order style: centralizing power, sidelining critics and expanding the military’s role in public life.
There are more worrying signs. Earlier this year, the government said it would issue new textbooks to promote national pride, but that was postponed after backlash from historians who warned the books would likely omit key events, including those tied to Prabowo’s past, and downplay mass killings.
The phenomenon of authoritarian nostalgia is not isolated to Indonesia. In the Philippines, the dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos Sr has been whitewashed through a widespread campaign of social-media disinformation, paving the way for his son’s return to power in 2022.
A population too young to remember martial law has helped sustain the myth that those years were a golden age of peace and prosperity. Thailand’s recurring coups and Cambodia’s dynastic rule are sold as stability, not stagnation.
China’s model of smart authoritarianism is offering proof that economic growth and innovation without political freedom is possible. That has emboldened leaders in the global south and further afield who see democracy as inconvenient.
Civil society must push back before further ground is ceded. Teaching the darker chapters of history in schools and universities is essential. When young citizens do not know what dictatorship looks like, they become more vulnerable to its return.
The risk of that kind of nostalgia goes beyond politics. Authoritarian systems often go hand in hand with a lack of transparency. Suharto’s Indonesia should serve as a warning sign of how perceived stability can crumble overnight. Investors and policymakers alike should note that weak institutions and selective memory make for a volatile mix.
Indonesia’s decision to celebrate Suharto is being sold as an attempt to reconcile with history. It is not. It is a reminder that when nations forget their authoritarian pasts, they risk inviting them back.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. Ruth Pollard is a Bloomberg Opinion managing editor. Previously, she was South and Southeast Asia government team leader at Bloomberg News and Middle East correspondent for the Sydney Morning Herald. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is