Urologist and former Fu Jen Catholic University president Chiang Han-sun (江漢聲) was stabbed by a 30-year-old man at the university’s hospital in New Taipei City on Tuesday. The suspect, surnamed Tseng (曾), reportedly entered Chiang’s office and attacked him with a utility knife before being restrained by hospital security.
Since 2009, acts of violence against medical personnel have been on the rise, prompting the Legislative Yuan to pass amendments to the Medical Care Act (醫療法) in 2014, establishing new penalties for acts of violence committed in medical facilities to “ensure the safety of medical personnel when they practice medicine.”
However, the clumsy and outdated drafting techniques employed by legislators — in addition to their adherence to the traditional belief that medical professionals should be of noble moral character and not quarrel with patients — the amendments ended up creating more problems than they solved, with some provisions having become all but useless.
Article 106 of the act states that “persons who damage the life saving equipment in medical care institutions or other similar places and consequently endanger the life, body or health of others are subject to imprisonment for no more than three years, detention or a fine of no more than NT$300,000.”
However, Article 352 of the Criminal Code stipulates that same penalty for destroying or damaging another person’s document and causing injury to the public or another. Setting the same statutory penalty for damaging life-supporting medical equipment and merely damaging a document clearly contravenes the principle of proportionality.
Furthermore, Article 106 of the Medical Care Act also stipulates that “persons who hinder medical personnel or emergency medical services personnel from carrying out medical practices or emergency medical services by means of violence, coercion, intimidation or other illegal methods are subject to imprisonment for no more than three years, or in addition thereto, a fine of no more than NT$300,000.”
If the offense causes the death of medical personnel or emergency medical services personnel, then the offender is subject to “imprisonment for life or no less than seven years.” If it results in serious injury to medical personnel or emergency medical services personnel, then the punishment is imprisonment for no less than three years, but no more than 10 years.
However, this provision is identical to that outlined by Article 277 of the Criminal Code, which concerns the offense of causing injury to another — it does not impose any additional statutory penalties. If legal protections for medical personnel and emergency medical services personnel are not designed from the perspective of safeguarding their professional practice and occupational safety, they risk diminishing healthcare workers’ motivation to remain in the field.
More importantly, Taiwan has over the past few years faced a mass exodus of medical professionals. If the law fails to promptly respond, frontline healthcare workers would be pushed into even deeper hardship, which would ultimately undermine the public’s right to health.
The provisions in Article 106 of the Medical Care Act that allow for detention and fines in lieu of imprisonment for damaging life-saving equipment in medical care institutions should be removed to prevent excessively light penalties that would weaken the law’s deterrent effect. For the provision that addresses the use of violence, coercion, intimidation or other illegal methods to hinder medical personnel or emergency medical services personnel from carrying out medical practices or emergency medical services, the maximum statutory penalty should be raised from three years to either five or seven years of imprisonment.
This would create a clear distinction between Article 304 of the Criminal Code — which stipulates three years of imprisonment for ordinary violence or threats — and provide healthcare workers with special legal protections. Likewise, the penalties for the same offense resulting in death should also be increased.
Cultivating a positive medical environment depends not only on amending regulations, but also on establishing mutual respect and joint effort between medical personnel and their patients.
Chao Hsuey-wen is an assistant professor and holds a doctorate in law from Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS