Urologist and former Fu Jen Catholic University president Chiang Han-sun (江漢聲) was stabbed by a 30-year-old man at the university’s hospital in New Taipei City on Tuesday. The suspect, surnamed Tseng (曾), reportedly entered Chiang’s office and attacked him with a utility knife before being restrained by hospital security.
Since 2009, acts of violence against medical personnel have been on the rise, prompting the Legislative Yuan to pass amendments to the Medical Care Act (醫療法) in 2014, establishing new penalties for acts of violence committed in medical facilities to “ensure the safety of medical personnel when they practice medicine.”
However, the clumsy and outdated drafting techniques employed by legislators — in addition to their adherence to the traditional belief that medical professionals should be of noble moral character and not quarrel with patients — the amendments ended up creating more problems than they solved, with some provisions having become all but useless.
Article 106 of the act states that “persons who damage the life saving equipment in medical care institutions or other similar places and consequently endanger the life, body or health of others are subject to imprisonment for no more than three years, detention or a fine of no more than NT$300,000.”
However, Article 352 of the Criminal Code stipulates that same penalty for destroying or damaging another person’s document and causing injury to the public or another. Setting the same statutory penalty for damaging life-supporting medical equipment and merely damaging a document clearly contravenes the principle of proportionality.
Furthermore, Article 106 of the Medical Care Act also stipulates that “persons who hinder medical personnel or emergency medical services personnel from carrying out medical practices or emergency medical services by means of violence, coercion, intimidation or other illegal methods are subject to imprisonment for no more than three years, or in addition thereto, a fine of no more than NT$300,000.”
If the offense causes the death of medical personnel or emergency medical services personnel, then the offender is subject to “imprisonment for life or no less than seven years.” If it results in serious injury to medical personnel or emergency medical services personnel, then the punishment is imprisonment for no less than three years, but no more than 10 years.
However, this provision is identical to that outlined by Article 277 of the Criminal Code, which concerns the offense of causing injury to another — it does not impose any additional statutory penalties. If legal protections for medical personnel and emergency medical services personnel are not designed from the perspective of safeguarding their professional practice and occupational safety, they risk diminishing healthcare workers’ motivation to remain in the field.
More importantly, Taiwan has over the past few years faced a mass exodus of medical professionals. If the law fails to promptly respond, frontline healthcare workers would be pushed into even deeper hardship, which would ultimately undermine the public’s right to health.
The provisions in Article 106 of the Medical Care Act that allow for detention and fines in lieu of imprisonment for damaging life-saving equipment in medical care institutions should be removed to prevent excessively light penalties that would weaken the law’s deterrent effect. For the provision that addresses the use of violence, coercion, intimidation or other illegal methods to hinder medical personnel or emergency medical services personnel from carrying out medical practices or emergency medical services, the maximum statutory penalty should be raised from three years to either five or seven years of imprisonment.
This would create a clear distinction between Article 304 of the Criminal Code — which stipulates three years of imprisonment for ordinary violence or threats — and provide healthcare workers with special legal protections. Likewise, the penalties for the same offense resulting in death should also be increased.
Cultivating a positive medical environment depends not only on amending regulations, but also on establishing mutual respect and joint effort between medical personnel and their patients.
Chao Hsuey-wen is an assistant professor and holds a doctorate in law from Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
When the towers of Wang Fuk Court turned into a seven-building inferno on Wednesday last week, killing 128 people, including a firefighter, Hong Kong officials promised investigations, pledged to review regulations and within hours issued a plan to replace bamboo scaffolding with steel. It sounded decisive. It was not. The gestures are about political optics, not accountability. The tragedy was not caused by bamboo or by outdated laws. Flame-retardant netting is already required. Under Hong Kong’s Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme — which requires buildings more than 30 years old to undergo inspection every decade and compulsory repairs — the framework for
President William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced a plan to invest an additional NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.8 billion) in military spending to procure advanced defense systems over the next eight years, and outlined two major plans and concrete steps to defend democratic Taiwan in the face of China’s intensifying threat. While Lai’s plans for boosting the country’s national security have been praised by many US lawmakers, former defense officials, academics and the American Institute in Taiwan, the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan, they were not equally welcomed by all Taiwanese, particularly among the opposition parties. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman
President William Lai’s (賴清德) historic announcement on Wednesday, Nov. 26, of a supplemental defense budget valued in excess of US$40 billion is a testament to the seriousness with which Taiwan is responding to the relentless expansionist ambitions of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the Chinese Communist Party and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Lai is responding to the threat posed to Taiwan sovereignty along with US President Donald Trump’s insistence that American partners in good standing must take on more responsibility for their own defense. The supplemental defense budget will be broken into three main parts. The first and largest piece
RSS