The Cabinet on Thursday last week approved several measures that would ease the limits on the number of migrant workers manufacturers may hire, along with allowing the hospitality sector and ports to recruit foreign workers. Employers would be required to raise the salary of their lowest-paid domestic worker by NT$2,000 for each additional migrant worker hired, and the total number of such recruits should not exceed 10 percent of their workforce. The Cabinet is also reviewing President William Lai’s (賴清德) proposal to expand eligibility for families to hire foreign domestic helpers.
These policies, while intended to address Taiwan’s numerous demographic challenges — record low birthrates, a rapidly aging population and worsening labor shortages — are part of a problematic trend. As the government eases restrictions on hiring foreigners, it does so without meaningfully improving working conditions. Issues such as low wages, a lack of labor protections and strict limits on job mobility remain unaddressed, even as migrant workers become an ever-larger part of Taiwan’s workforce.
Tying the hiring of additional migrant workers to a small salary increase for a local employee might seem like an attempt to protect Taiwanese workers and incentivize domestic hiring. In practice, however, it is unlikely to meaningfully benefit local workers and risks widening inequality. The measure would effectively give businesses a green light to bring in cheaper labor provided they make a token gesture toward fairness. In a sector already characterized by wage stagnation, this would deepen the divide between Taiwanese and migrant workers, and allow companies to avoid addressing structural issues such as low salaries and undesirable working conditions.
In criticizing the measure, Taiwan Labor Front secretary-general Yang Shu-wei (楊書瑋) posed a critical question: Are industries truly short of workers, or simply short of workers willing to accept low pay? This approach suggests the latter.
Lai’s proposal to expand the hiring of foreign domestic helpers has even more troubling implications. Unlike manufacturing workers, caregivers are excluded from the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法) and lack basic protections such as minimum wage guarantees, overtime pay and regular rest days. Many routinely work long hours for below-minimum pay and have very few avenues for seeking help when faced with abuse or mistreatment.
While a decision on the policy’s implementation is not expected until the end of this year, the government should not move forward without developing a corresponding plan to address these long-standing issues. Expanding the scope of domestic caregiving without reforming its legal framework and establishing concrete labor protections would only reinforce patterns of exploitation.
Migrant workers play a central role in Taiwan’s economy. Their numbers have increased 15 percent over the past two years, with the majority employed in domestic caregiving, manufacturing and construction — all sectors marked by low pay, physically demanding labor and difficult working conditions. That figure would certainly continue to climb under the latest policy changes, but if legal protections and oversight fail to keep pace, Taiwan risks becoming entrenched in a labor system in which a growing share of its workforce remains underpaid and undervalued. Migrant workers are being treated as a stopgap solution to demographic decline rather than as human beings who deserve fair treatment and adequate legal protections.
By continuing to ease hiring restrictions on migrant workers without addressing their exploitation, the government is signaling to employers that exploiting them through low wages and minimal protections is an acceptable — and even encouraged — practice.
If migrant workers are to play an integral role in Taiwan’s caregiving and manufacturing sectors, then their rights and welfare must be treated as a matter of national interest.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
RSS