The Cabinet on Thursday last week approved several measures that would ease the limits on the number of migrant workers manufacturers may hire, along with allowing the hospitality sector and ports to recruit foreign workers. Employers would be required to raise the salary of their lowest-paid domestic worker by NT$2,000 for each additional migrant worker hired, and the total number of such recruits should not exceed 10 percent of their workforce. The Cabinet is also reviewing President William Lai’s (賴清德) proposal to expand eligibility for families to hire foreign domestic helpers.
These policies, while intended to address Taiwan’s numerous demographic challenges — record low birthrates, a rapidly aging population and worsening labor shortages — are part of a problematic trend. As the government eases restrictions on hiring foreigners, it does so without meaningfully improving working conditions. Issues such as low wages, a lack of labor protections and strict limits on job mobility remain unaddressed, even as migrant workers become an ever-larger part of Taiwan’s workforce.
Tying the hiring of additional migrant workers to a small salary increase for a local employee might seem like an attempt to protect Taiwanese workers and incentivize domestic hiring. In practice, however, it is unlikely to meaningfully benefit local workers and risks widening inequality. The measure would effectively give businesses a green light to bring in cheaper labor provided they make a token gesture toward fairness. In a sector already characterized by wage stagnation, this would deepen the divide between Taiwanese and migrant workers, and allow companies to avoid addressing structural issues such as low salaries and undesirable working conditions.
In criticizing the measure, Taiwan Labor Front secretary-general Yang Shu-wei (楊書瑋) posed a critical question: Are industries truly short of workers, or simply short of workers willing to accept low pay? This approach suggests the latter.
Lai’s proposal to expand the hiring of foreign domestic helpers has even more troubling implications. Unlike manufacturing workers, caregivers are excluded from the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法) and lack basic protections such as minimum wage guarantees, overtime pay and regular rest days. Many routinely work long hours for below-minimum pay and have very few avenues for seeking help when faced with abuse or mistreatment.
While a decision on the policy’s implementation is not expected until the end of this year, the government should not move forward without developing a corresponding plan to address these long-standing issues. Expanding the scope of domestic caregiving without reforming its legal framework and establishing concrete labor protections would only reinforce patterns of exploitation.
Migrant workers play a central role in Taiwan’s economy. Their numbers have increased 15 percent over the past two years, with the majority employed in domestic caregiving, manufacturing and construction — all sectors marked by low pay, physically demanding labor and difficult working conditions. That figure would certainly continue to climb under the latest policy changes, but if legal protections and oversight fail to keep pace, Taiwan risks becoming entrenched in a labor system in which a growing share of its workforce remains underpaid and undervalued. Migrant workers are being treated as a stopgap solution to demographic decline rather than as human beings who deserve fair treatment and adequate legal protections.
By continuing to ease hiring restrictions on migrant workers without addressing their exploitation, the government is signaling to employers that exploiting them through low wages and minimal protections is an acceptable — and even encouraged — practice.
If migrant workers are to play an integral role in Taiwan’s caregiving and manufacturing sectors, then their rights and welfare must be treated as a matter of national interest.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
More than a week after Hondurans voted, the country still does not know who will be its next president. The Honduran National Electoral Council has not declared a winner, and the transmission of results has experienced repeated malfunctions that interrupted updates for almost 24 hours at times. The delay has become the second-longest post-electoral silence since the election of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernandez of the National Party in 2017, which was tainted by accusations of fraud. Once again, this has raised concerns among observers, civil society groups and the international community. The preliminary results remain close, but both
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
The Taipei Women’s Rescue Foundation has demanded an apology from China Central Television (CCTV), accusing the Chinese state broadcaster of using “deceptive editing” and distorting the intent of a recent documentary on “comfort women.” According to the foundation, the Ama Museum in Taipei granted CCTV limited permission to film on the condition that the footage be used solely for public education. Yet when the documentary aired, the museum was reportedly presented alongside commentary condemning Taiwan’s alleged “warmongering” and criticizing the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government’s stance toward Japan. Instead of focusing on women’s rights or historical memory, the program appeared crafted
RSS