Pianist Keith Jarrett’s Koln Concert is one of the greatest pieces of improvisation in the history of jazz — an hour of unrestrained glory, delivered without a score or a plan.
However, Jarrett’s achievement owed nothing to chance. Rather, it was the outcome of thousands of hours of tedious repetition — endless scales that honed the pianist’s reflexes and muscle memory. Geniuses of improvisation rely on mastery, which itself comes from practice. They are not just winging it.
This is a central paradox of human learning: Modes of action could be transcended only after being deeply internalized. Creativity always begins with constraint.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
In what Russian pediatric psychologist Lev Vygotsky called the “zone of proximal development,” repetition transforms limitation into skill.
Likewise, Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget said that intelligence is built through action, through the repeated manipulation of knowledge until it becomes instinctive. To learn is to master a framework well enough to be able to transcend it.
The same dynamic also applies to more mundane intellectual work. Professionals in the service or technology sectors must first adhere to codified rules before learning to break the mold. Nobel laureate psychologist Daniel Kahneman captured this transition with his distinction between two forms of cognition: “System 1” is fast, intuitive and automatic, whereas “System 2” is slow, analytical and deliberate.
As knowledge workers become more seasoned, they are often encouraged to emulate Spanish conquistador Hernan Cortes and “burn the ships” of technical fluency so they could focus on developing the new. The idea is to dispense with the System 2 thinking that got you across the Atlantic and to trust wholly in your instincts (System 1).
However, artificial intelligence (AI) now threatens to eliminate the ocean-crossing stage of knowledge workers’ careers.
A study by academics Erik Brynjolfsson, Bharat Chandar and Ruyu Chen looked at millions of US payroll records and found that, since late 2022, employment among those aged 22 to 25 has fallen by 13 percent in the most AI-exposed occupations — customer service, communications and especially software development — while older workers in the same fields have been largely unaffected.
Other research has arrived at similar findings. For example, academics Seyed Mahdi Hosseini and Guy Lichtinger last month highlighted an even steeper decline in early AI-adopting companies. These studies showed that the most affected jobs are those in which AI is used to automate tasks, whereas those in which AI augments human capabilities remain stable. This distinction is crucial, because the tasks most at risk of automation are precisely those that once served as crucibles for professional growth.
The implication is that AI could destroy the foundations on which more senior employees’ intuition and judgment rest. A banker becomes a shrewd negotiator only after spending long nights and weekends adjusting financial models. An engineer grasps the logic of a system only after debugging hundreds of trivial errors. Such repetitive, boring, codified work is the raw material of tacit knowledge — the kind that no textbook could teach. With AI, we are burning younger generations’ ships without first teaching them how to forge ahead on their own.
Young people today already blame their elders for leaving them with mounting problems such as climate change, and now they are inheriting yet another debt. Cognitive science reminds us that learning is not just an accumulation of information. It is an embodied process.
As neuroscientist Stanislas Dehaene said, learning relies on “neuronal recycling,” with the brain repurposing existing circuits through repeated practice. That recycling requires action, not delegation.
Young workers cannot become experts by merely validating a machine’s output; they cannot develop intuition by supervising an algorithm. If we transfer all codified knowledge to machines, it would become ever harder to learn by doing, to achieve mastery and thus to aspire to creative freedom.
How are we to avoid this cognitive trap? There are three principles that should guide companies and society more broadly.
First, restore dignity and value to repetitive work. Repetition should not always be viewed as drudgery; often, it is a cognitive investment. Companies should recognize the formative power of such work. No musician becomes a virtuoso without scales; no financial analyst or lawyer develops business judgment without performing in their junior years all the tedious tasks we would be tempted to entrust a machine.
Second, we need to rethink workflows. Walmart CEO Doug McMillon might well be right that “AI is going to change literally every job.” In that case, firms that use AI to automate certain tasks should create others through which young professionals could still practice, make mistakes and learn. Progress depends less on being efficient than on being engaged. The goal is not to safeguard existing jobs at all costs, but to create occupations enabling the transition from System 2 to System 1 thinking.
Finally, we must introduce a norm of intergenerational accountability. Every act of automation should be assessed not only for its productivity gains here and now, but also for its future costs.
What happens to the next generation when we remove the learning phase? A principle of “cognitive decency” should be embedded in corporate ethics charters alongside those requiring environmental sustainability.
Jarrett shone that night in Cologne, Germany, precisely because he had spent years following a playbook. Likewise, we as a society would retain our creative freedom only if we preserve the time it takes to learn. We must do so while also embracing change.
As economist Philippe Aghion, one of this year’s Nobel laureates in economics, has shown, creative destruction is the engine of progress.
However, we cannot turn a blind eye to other worldviews. Emerging markets and developing economies, which are leapfrogging straight to native, widespread AI adoption, might view things differently. The cognitive debt that we are leaving for younger people in advanced economies might be their opportunity. It would be our duty to pay attention. For now, though, acknowledging that the debt exists, and would grow, is the first step toward addressing it.
Bertrand Badre, a former managing director of the World Bank, is chair of the Project Syndicate Advisory Board, CEO and founder of Blue Like an Orange Sustainable Capital, and the author of Can Finance Save the World? Florian Ingen-Housz is partner at Altermind, a Paris-based strategy consultancy.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The government and local industries breathed a sigh of relief after Shin Kong Life Insurance Co last week said it would relinquish surface rights for two plots in Taipei’s Beitou District (北投) to Nvidia Corp. The US chip-design giant’s plan to expand its local presence will be crucial for Taiwan to safeguard its core role in the global artificial intelligence (AI) ecosystem and to advance the nation’s AI development. The land in dispute is owned by the Taipei City Government, which in 2021 sold the rights to develop and use the two plots of land, codenamed T17 and T18, to the
Taiwan’s first case of African swine fever (ASF) was confirmed on Tuesday evening at a hog farm in Taichung’s Wuci District (梧棲), trigging nationwide emergency measures and stripping Taiwan of its status as the only Asian country free of classical swine fever, ASF and foot-and-mouth disease, a certification it received on May 29. The government on Wednesday set up a Central Emergency Operations Center in Taichung and instituted an immediate five-day ban on transporting and slaughtering hogs, and on feeding pigs kitchen waste. The ban was later extended to 15 days, to account for the incubation period of the virus
The ceasefire in the Middle East is a rare cause for celebration in that war-torn region. Hamas has released all of the living hostages it captured on Oct. 7, 2023, regular combat operations have ceased, and Israel has drawn closer to its Arab neighbors. Israel, with crucial support from the United States, has achieved all of this despite concerted efforts from the forces of darkness to prevent it. Hamas, of course, is a longtime client of Iran, which in turn is a client of China. Two years ago, when Hamas invaded Israel — killing 1,200, kidnapping 251, and brutalizing countless others
Art and cultural events are key for a city’s cultivation of soft power and international image, and how politicians engage with them often defines their success. Representative to Austria Liu Suan-yung’s (劉玄詠) conducting performance and Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen’s (盧秀燕) show of drumming and the Tainan Jazz Festival demonstrate different outcomes when politics meet culture. While a thoughtful and professional engagement can heighten an event’s status and cultural value, indulging in political theater runs the risk of undermining trust and its reception. During a National Day reception celebration in Austria on Oct. 8, Liu, who was formerly director of the
RSS