As Asia enters a phase of geopolitical transition, the Taiwan-Indonesia relationship warrants greater strategic consideration. The two societies are significantly interconnected beyond what their lack of formal diplomatic relations might imply. Economic exchanges, educational cooperation and human mobility have quietly established a robust foundation for engagement. Nonetheless, this connection remains under the radar, pragmatic, cautious, yet full of potential. In a region increasingly characterized by competition among major powers, Taiwan and Indonesia exemplify moderation and adaptability. Their relationship embodies a form of regional diplomacy that is understated, but consistent; informal yet effective. It is based on the shared understanding that stability in the Indo-Pacific region would depend less on grand alliances and more on practical cooperation among middle and emerging-power states.
Indonesia’s foreign policy under Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto continues a long-standing tradition of strategic autonomy. Jakarta maintains an independent posture toward Washington and Beijing, while deepening ties with regional partners that respect its sovereignty. This balance leaves space for cooperation with Taiwan, especially in areas of education, technology, labor and innovation, all fields where Taipei could contribute without creating political friction.
Taiwan, for its part, has shown through its New Southbound Policy that engagement with Southeast Asia could be pragmatic and visionary. Among ASEAN members, Indonesia occupies a central position. It is the region’s largest economy, a key manufacturing base and a demographic powerhouse. Over the past decade, Taiwan and Indonesia have strengthened their economic and educational ties, and trade volumes are expanding, Taiwanese investment in the digital and manufacturing sectors is growing, and more than 10,000 Indonesian students now study at Taiwanese universities.
Equally important is the human dimension. About 270,000 Indonesian workers are employed in Taiwan, contributing to essential sectors such as care, fisheries and small-scale industry. Managed responsibly, this connection could become a pillar of long-term trust between Jakarta and Taipei. The relationship, in other words, already exists beyond official diplomacy; it only needs recognition and structure. A further element that adds complexity and promise to the partnership is maritime geography.
Both Indonesia and Taiwan occupy strategic positions along vital sea lanes. Cooperation in maritime safety, port connectivity and sustainable fisheries could serve as a new platform for engagement. These initiatives would not only improve economic resilience, but also support regional security in a nonconfrontational way. Taiwan’s experience in digital monitoring, marine research and coastal management could complement Indonesia’s vast maritime ambitions under its Global Maritime Fulcrum doctrine.
Cooperation with Jakarta enables Taiwan to maintain engagement within the broader ASEAN framework while respecting regional sensitivities. Additionally, this partnership aligns with Indonesia’s aspiration to establish an inclusive Indo-Pacific order, devoid of hegemony by a single power. Taiwan’s capabilities in education, technology and sustainable industries align with Indonesia’s requirements for skill development and innovation. Collaborative efforts in digital governance, renewable energy and maritime logistics could solidify the relationship around shared priorities rather than formal diplomatic engagements. Such discreet and consistent cooperation would contribute directly to ASEAN’s objectives of connectivity and resilience, areas where Taiwan’s expertise offers distinct value.
This partnership could also evolve into a platform for triangular cooperation. Taiwan and Indonesia could work jointly in capacity-building programs for other ASEAN countries, particularly in green technology and public administration. By doing so, they would position themselves as cocreators of regional solutions rather than competitors. This would also reinforce ASEAN’s own centrality by demonstrating that regional cooperation can emerge organically from shared interests, not just from formal institutions.
Indonesia and Taiwan have constructed their regional outlooks on the principle of moderation. Neither country seeks confrontation; both favor adaptability and pragmatic dialogue. This shared disposition affords their partnership a stability that is uncommon in an era characterized by polarization. As major powers vie for influence, the capacity of middle-tier states and societies to cooperate calmly and unobtrusively becomes a vital component of regional security.
Institutionalizing this cooperation should be prioritized. Regular consultations on labor, vocational education and maritime development could foster predictability and transparency. Expanding academic partnerships would deepen mutual understanding among their peoples and establish a sustainable foundation for future leaders. Both sides could also explore a more structured economic dialogue, perhaps in the form of a Taiwan-Indonesia business and innovation forum, designed to connect industries and policymakers in an ongoing exchange of expertise.
Indonesia and Taiwan already share a vision of an Asia that values autonomy, development and dignity. Their discreet partnership serves as a reminder that diplomacy need not always be overt to be effective. In a region riddled with tensions and ambitions, the most resilient connections are often those cultivated patiently, with respect and consistency. In many ways, Taiwan and Indonesia are quietly proving that regional order can also be built from below, through trust, moderation and shared purpose, rather than through power alone.
Aniello Iannone is a lecturer in Indonesian and Southeast Asian politics at the Department of Political Science and Government at Diponegoro University in Indonesia. His research focuses on ASEAN regionalism, Indonesian politics and the international political economy of Southeast Asia.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
When 17,000 troops from the US, the Philippines, Australia, Japan, Canada, France and New Zealand spread across the Philippine archipelago for the Balikatan military exercise, running from tomorrow through May 8, the official language would be about interoperability, readiness and regional peace. However, the strategic subtext is becoming harder to ignore: The exercises are increasingly about the military geography around Taiwan. Balikatan has always carried political weight. This year, however, the exercise looks different in ways that matter not only to Manila and Washington, but also to Taipei. What began in 2023 as a shift toward a more serious deterrence posture
RSS