As Asia enters a phase of geopolitical transition, the Taiwan-Indonesia relationship warrants greater strategic consideration. The two societies are significantly interconnected beyond what their lack of formal diplomatic relations might imply. Economic exchanges, educational cooperation and human mobility have quietly established a robust foundation for engagement. Nonetheless, this connection remains under the radar, pragmatic, cautious, yet full of potential. In a region increasingly characterized by competition among major powers, Taiwan and Indonesia exemplify moderation and adaptability. Their relationship embodies a form of regional diplomacy that is understated, but consistent; informal yet effective. It is based on the shared understanding that stability in the Indo-Pacific region would depend less on grand alliances and more on practical cooperation among middle and emerging-power states.
Indonesia’s foreign policy under Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto continues a long-standing tradition of strategic autonomy. Jakarta maintains an independent posture toward Washington and Beijing, while deepening ties with regional partners that respect its sovereignty. This balance leaves space for cooperation with Taiwan, especially in areas of education, technology, labor and innovation, all fields where Taipei could contribute without creating political friction.
Taiwan, for its part, has shown through its New Southbound Policy that engagement with Southeast Asia could be pragmatic and visionary. Among ASEAN members, Indonesia occupies a central position. It is the region’s largest economy, a key manufacturing base and a demographic powerhouse. Over the past decade, Taiwan and Indonesia have strengthened their economic and educational ties, and trade volumes are expanding, Taiwanese investment in the digital and manufacturing sectors is growing, and more than 10,000 Indonesian students now study at Taiwanese universities.
Equally important is the human dimension. About 270,000 Indonesian workers are employed in Taiwan, contributing to essential sectors such as care, fisheries and small-scale industry. Managed responsibly, this connection could become a pillar of long-term trust between Jakarta and Taipei. The relationship, in other words, already exists beyond official diplomacy; it only needs recognition and structure. A further element that adds complexity and promise to the partnership is maritime geography.
Both Indonesia and Taiwan occupy strategic positions along vital sea lanes. Cooperation in maritime safety, port connectivity and sustainable fisheries could serve as a new platform for engagement. These initiatives would not only improve economic resilience, but also support regional security in a nonconfrontational way. Taiwan’s experience in digital monitoring, marine research and coastal management could complement Indonesia’s vast maritime ambitions under its Global Maritime Fulcrum doctrine.
Cooperation with Jakarta enables Taiwan to maintain engagement within the broader ASEAN framework while respecting regional sensitivities. Additionally, this partnership aligns with Indonesia’s aspiration to establish an inclusive Indo-Pacific order, devoid of hegemony by a single power. Taiwan’s capabilities in education, technology and sustainable industries align with Indonesia’s requirements for skill development and innovation. Collaborative efforts in digital governance, renewable energy and maritime logistics could solidify the relationship around shared priorities rather than formal diplomatic engagements. Such discreet and consistent cooperation would contribute directly to ASEAN’s objectives of connectivity and resilience, areas where Taiwan’s expertise offers distinct value.
This partnership could also evolve into a platform for triangular cooperation. Taiwan and Indonesia could work jointly in capacity-building programs for other ASEAN countries, particularly in green technology and public administration. By doing so, they would position themselves as cocreators of regional solutions rather than competitors. This would also reinforce ASEAN’s own centrality by demonstrating that regional cooperation can emerge organically from shared interests, not just from formal institutions.
Indonesia and Taiwan have constructed their regional outlooks on the principle of moderation. Neither country seeks confrontation; both favor adaptability and pragmatic dialogue. This shared disposition affords their partnership a stability that is uncommon in an era characterized by polarization. As major powers vie for influence, the capacity of middle-tier states and societies to cooperate calmly and unobtrusively becomes a vital component of regional security.
Institutionalizing this cooperation should be prioritized. Regular consultations on labor, vocational education and maritime development could foster predictability and transparency. Expanding academic partnerships would deepen mutual understanding among their peoples and establish a sustainable foundation for future leaders. Both sides could also explore a more structured economic dialogue, perhaps in the form of a Taiwan-Indonesia business and innovation forum, designed to connect industries and policymakers in an ongoing exchange of expertise.
Indonesia and Taiwan already share a vision of an Asia that values autonomy, development and dignity. Their discreet partnership serves as a reminder that diplomacy need not always be overt to be effective. In a region riddled with tensions and ambitions, the most resilient connections are often those cultivated patiently, with respect and consistency. In many ways, Taiwan and Indonesia are quietly proving that regional order can also be built from below, through trust, moderation and shared purpose, rather than through power alone.
Aniello Iannone is a lecturer in Indonesian and Southeast Asian politics at the Department of Political Science and Government at Diponegoro University in Indonesia. His research focuses on ASEAN regionalism, Indonesian politics and the international political economy of Southeast Asia.
The government and local industries breathed a sigh of relief after Shin Kong Life Insurance Co last week said it would relinquish surface rights for two plots in Taipei’s Beitou District (北投) to Nvidia Corp. The US chip-design giant’s plan to expand its local presence will be crucial for Taiwan to safeguard its core role in the global artificial intelligence (AI) ecosystem and to advance the nation’s AI development. The land in dispute is owned by the Taipei City Government, which in 2021 sold the rights to develop and use the two plots of land, codenamed T17 and T18, to the
Taiwan’s first case of African swine fever (ASF) was confirmed on Tuesday evening at a hog farm in Taichung’s Wuci District (梧棲), trigging nationwide emergency measures and stripping Taiwan of its status as the only Asian country free of classical swine fever, ASF and foot-and-mouth disease, a certification it received on May 29. The government on Wednesday set up a Central Emergency Operations Center in Taichung and instituted an immediate five-day ban on transporting and slaughtering hogs, and on feeding pigs kitchen waste. The ban was later extended to 15 days, to account for the incubation period of the virus

The ceasefire in the Middle East is a rare cause for celebration in that war-torn region. Hamas has released all of the living hostages it captured on Oct. 7, 2023, regular combat operations have ceased, and Israel has drawn closer to its Arab neighbors. Israel, with crucial support from the United States, has achieved all of this despite concerted efforts from the forces of darkness to prevent it. Hamas, of course, is a longtime client of Iran, which in turn is a client of China. Two years ago, when Hamas invaded Israel — killing 1,200, kidnapping 251, and brutalizing countless others
US President Donald Trump has announced his eagerness to meet North Korean leader Kim Jong-un while in South Korea for the APEC summit. That implies a possible revival of US-North Korea talks, frozen since 2019. While some would dismiss such a move as appeasement, renewed US engagement with North Korea could benefit Taiwan’s security interests. The long-standing stalemate between Washington and Pyongyang has allowed Beijing to entrench its dominance in the region, creating a myth that only China can “manage” Kim’s rogue nation. That dynamic has allowed Beijing to present itself as an indispensable power broker: extracting concessions from Washington, Seoul