A mother in Taoyuan on Tuesday last week posted in a Facebook group photos of her son, saying he had become a “human canvas” — his face, hands and stomach were covered in blue marker ink. When she asked him what happened, the child tearfully told her that the classmate sitting next to him had done it. The mother then accused the classmate of bullying, and questioned why the teacher and school did not know anything about the incident.
However, when the Taoyuan Department of Education investigated the incident the following day, the student’s teacher and classmates said that he had drawn on his own face and body — there was no bullying involved.
The finding likely left his mother stunned and at a loss about how to respond.
Having been a teacher for many years, I am generally unfazed by these kinds of campus misunderstandings and would like to offer a few thoughts based on my experience with suspected incidents of bullying.
When parents harshly press their children for accountability, they often panic and falsely shift the blame onto others. As a result, their innocent classmates are wrongfully accused, and teachers must reluctantly take responsibility. Such situations are all too common in classrooms. It is perfectly understandable for parents to be angry upon seeing that their child has become a “human canvas,” but they should first seek the truth from their child’s homeroom teacher.
If parents do not believe the results of the teacher’s findings, they could ask their child’s classmates and cross-check information from multiple sources to clarify the truth. However, if they remain convinced that their child’s version of the story is accurate and refuse to accept other accounts, they could turn to the school’s internal review mechanism, the school affairs committee, for a formal investigation.
Additionally, parents should try their best to refrain from using social media to make public accusations or prematurely expose incidents. If, after the issue has already blown up online, the truth turns out to be the opposite of what the parents or child initially said, how would the parents handle the situation?
Some teachers or students who have been wrongly accused might be willing to forgive and forget, understanding that they just acted impulsively out of concern for their child. However, the parents of falsely accused students might not be as forgiving. If a parent’s actions cause their child to be treated unfairly, they could hire a lawyer to seek justice, and the situation could become extremely difficult to resolve.
Issues at school should be handled within the educational system. Allowing schools or teachers to address such situations carries far less legal risk than parents posting accusations on social media. After all, parents are adults and must bear legal responsibility for their actions. A simple apology after the fact might not undo the damage. Thus, it is best for parents to think carefully before taking action. A moment of rashness or impulsivity could impact others and themselves, ultimately doing more harm than good.
Chiu Shih-chang is a teacher.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS