French President Emmanuel Macron’s latest political gamble is bordering on insanity: Trying the same thing, but expecting different results. Sebastien Lecornu, the prime minister whose government broke records on Monday last week after collapsing within 14 hours, has been reappointed sans some of the more controversial ministerial picks from last time.
As before, the aim is to court the center-left with policy concessions, avert snap elections and pass a budget that would achieve stability on the road to the presidential elections in 2027. What has changed is Macron’s apparent willingness to put his reform legacy on the line to get there. It might not be enough.
Survival for 39-year-old Lecornu’s Cabinet of political exiles and technocrats boils down to 25 votes, or about one-third of the center-left Socialists’ parliamentary seats. That is all it would take in theory to topple the government, assuming they are added to no-confidence votes from Marine Le Pen’s far-right National Rally; the rump of center-right Gaullists that are allied with her; the far-left France Unbowed; the communists; and the Greens. Hence why a lot depends on Lecornu’s freedom of action in tacking left — he supposedly has a “blank check” from Macron to nip, tuck or scrap his reformist legacy.
The very Socialist party that Macron quit to form his own movement has become kingmaker, and the concessions could be remarkable.
POLICY U-TURNS
Lecornu has already pledged to give up using the right to push through legislation by decree. He has given the nod to more taxation of high earners, and he could this week freeze Macron’s divisive 2023 pension reform, effectively kicking it out to whoever succeeds the president to relitigate in 2027.
The cost is high, with such a freeze equating to 0.3 percent of GDP in 2026-2027, according to Bloomberg Economics. Not to mention the risk that deficit and debt reduction goes in the wrong direction. What is old is new, and reforms that were essential have suddenly become optional.
This is an incredibly precarious path to survival, let alone a new government contract. Macron’s machinations are putting tactics and politics first, essentially betting that, deep down, both the center-left and the center-right want to avoid snap elections and distance themselves from the extremes. That remains a hope and not a strategy.
The number of policy U-turns being proffered might also only increase the nihilism and revulsion voters feel toward the current political class, storing up trouble down the line. They might also amount to little if a parliamentary coalition of convenience fails to toe the line, as it has done several times over the past year.
Investors have started to tune out a lot of this mess, and the impact on markets and the economy has been fairly contained. Fair enough — but that is related to factors outside Macron’s control. The artificial intelligence boom — or bubble — is spreading its magic to blue-chip companies such as Legrand SA, which is benefiting from data-center spending and attracting takeover interest from ABB Ltd.
The private sector has also been quick to adapt to changing geopolitical shifts like US tariffs. Moreover, there is implicit trust that the European Central Bank and the European Commission will have France’s back if ever the volatility becomes a meltdown. Some or all of these factors might not last much longer, not least if France rings in the New Year without a budget.
‘WARRIOR MONK’
The main revelation of this drama has been Lecornu himself. The loyal, self-styled “warrior monk” has seen his approval ratings tick up with every twist and turn of a governmental mission he insists is for the good of the country. In another time and place, he might be cast as the “providential man” the French so often look for in times of crisis.
Other establishment pretenders to the throne, from Edouard Philippe to Gabriel Attal, are slowly, but surely losing ground against Le Pen in the first-round polls. Still, for the time being, Lecornu looks caught on the political equivalent of a life raft without a paddle — and the sharks are circling.
Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist writing about the future of money and the future of Europe. Previously, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
RSS