A Sept. 19 New York Times report has raised questions about China’s role in clashes between Thailand and Cambodia. In July, the most serious armed confrontations in a decade broke out on the border between the two countries, while China has sought to portray itself as a mediator.
However, Thai intelligence documents reviewed by the New York Times showed that Chinese Y-20 military aircraft carried shipments of rockets, artillery shells and mortars to the southwestern city of Sihanoukville in June.
The weapons were stored at a nearby naval base before being transported to the border region, the documents showed.
Senior Thai officials confirmed the intelligence reports to the New York Times, adding that the information was gathered by an intelligence network across military branches.
Cambodia has attempted to play down the report, saying the weapons shipment coincided with joint military exercises with the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, despite the exercise concluding in May.
The Chinese Ministry of National Defense is yet to respond to the allegations. However, shortly after fighting broke out, Beijing arranged a meeting with Thai Acting Defense Attache Colonel Siwat Rattan-ananta at the Thai embassy in Beijing to deny any Chinese involvement.
China has become Thailand’s largest arms supplier, far surpassing the US, while at the same time providing weapons to Cambodia’s much smaller military, the report said.
Throughout this expansion in arms sales, Beijing has been fully aware of the growing tensions between Thailand and Cambodia. Most of the rockets used by Cambodian forces were of Chinese origin, Southeast Asian human rights group Fortify Rights said, based on on-the-ground research.
Far from reflecting on the role its weapons exports have played in the civilian casualties in the conflict, China is persistent in framing itself as a regional broker of peace.
The conflict has laid bare the Chinese government’s lack of principles, with its arms sales helping to add fuel to the very fire it purports to be working to put out. As Chinese-made rockets and artillery contribute to civilian deaths, it flies in the face of humanitarianism that senior Chinese military officials have used routine drills as cover to deny supplying weapons to Cambodia in the lead-up to the fighting.
China has long sought to make inroads into Southeast Asian states through arms deals, yet plays at peacemaker at the sight of conflict. That is not just diplomatic hypocrisy, but represents a threat to regional peace and the sovereignty of Southeast Asian states. After intelligence on its weapons shipment emerged, China pushed back with a smokescreen of vaguely worded denial, while Cambodian Secretary of State for Defense Rath Dararoth described the report as “misleading.”
However, civilian casualties and devastated villages are an unavoidable reality left by the Chinese-made munitions. This reality, and the exposing of the “peacemaker” as nothing more than an arms dealer, has put Beijing’s hypocrisy and betrayal on full display.
Any notion of dedication to peace or neutrality is gone with the wind.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did