A Sept. 19 New York Times report has raised questions about China’s role in clashes between Thailand and Cambodia. In July, the most serious armed confrontations in a decade broke out on the border between the two countries, while China has sought to portray itself as a mediator.
However, Thai intelligence documents reviewed by the New York Times showed that Chinese Y-20 military aircraft carried shipments of rockets, artillery shells and mortars to the southwestern city of Sihanoukville in June.
The weapons were stored at a nearby naval base before being transported to the border region, the documents showed.
Senior Thai officials confirmed the intelligence reports to the New York Times, adding that the information was gathered by an intelligence network across military branches.
Cambodia has attempted to play down the report, saying the weapons shipment coincided with joint military exercises with the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, despite the exercise concluding in May.
The Chinese Ministry of National Defense is yet to respond to the allegations. However, shortly after fighting broke out, Beijing arranged a meeting with Thai Acting Defense Attache Colonel Siwat Rattan-ananta at the Thai embassy in Beijing to deny any Chinese involvement.
China has become Thailand’s largest arms supplier, far surpassing the US, while at the same time providing weapons to Cambodia’s much smaller military, the report said.
Throughout this expansion in arms sales, Beijing has been fully aware of the growing tensions between Thailand and Cambodia. Most of the rockets used by Cambodian forces were of Chinese origin, Southeast Asian human rights group Fortify Rights said, based on on-the-ground research.
Far from reflecting on the role its weapons exports have played in the civilian casualties in the conflict, China is persistent in framing itself as a regional broker of peace.
The conflict has laid bare the Chinese government’s lack of principles, with its arms sales helping to add fuel to the very fire it purports to be working to put out. As Chinese-made rockets and artillery contribute to civilian deaths, it flies in the face of humanitarianism that senior Chinese military officials have used routine drills as cover to deny supplying weapons to Cambodia in the lead-up to the fighting.
China has long sought to make inroads into Southeast Asian states through arms deals, yet plays at peacemaker at the sight of conflict. That is not just diplomatic hypocrisy, but represents a threat to regional peace and the sovereignty of Southeast Asian states. After intelligence on its weapons shipment emerged, China pushed back with a smokescreen of vaguely worded denial, while Cambodian Secretary of State for Defense Rath Dararoth described the report as “misleading.”
However, civilian casualties and devastated villages are an unavoidable reality left by the Chinese-made munitions. This reality, and the exposing of the “peacemaker” as nothing more than an arms dealer, has put Beijing’s hypocrisy and betrayal on full display.
Any notion of dedication to peace or neutrality is gone with the wind.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS