Recently leaked documents indicate that Russia has been training Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) paratroopers as part of Beijing’s preparation for a potential conflict over Taiwan. The news comes as Russian President Vladimir Putin’s strategic alliance with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) grows stronger.
The Sino-Russian “comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination for a new era,” signed in 2019, is still China’s most significant partnership deal to date. Since the outset of Russia’s war on Ukraine, PLA research groups at home and abroad have been taking notes. What lessons they might draw from the conflict and how they might proceed with reform has become a hot topic for think tanks.
Exchanges of military equipment and technology aside, forums on combat strategy and tactics are an important recent addition to the Sino-Russian program of military exercises. The Russian Armed Forces’ on-the-ground experience is a valuable asset for the PLA to consult. Still, a war with Taiwan would primarily hinge on China’s military strength, with little chance that other countries would cooperate in launching a joint operation.
However, China’s partnership with Russia would certainly make neighboring countries hesitant to step into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait — if they did, they might face not only the PLA, but potentially Russia, North Korea or perhaps even Pakistan. These countries do not necessarily pose a direct military threat to Taiwan, but may factor into the equation as other countries’ primary adversaries.
Japan, for instance, faces a certain level of threat from the PLA in the Taiwan Strait and East China Sea. After Russia launched its offensive on Ukraine, however, that threat grew thanks to joint Sino-Russian military drills in the Sea of Japan, and combined sea and air operations reaching the western Pacific Ocean.
Even if Moscow does not go in with Beijing in an offensive on Taiwan, as long as there are military exercises in the Sea of Japan, the Sea of Okhotsk or around the disputed islands to the north — known as the Kurils in Russia and the Northern Territories in Japan — Japan’s Self-Defense Forces and US forces stationed in Japan would be pushed to strengthen their defenses.
With deepening military relations between China and Russia, this could mean that Washington and Tokyo pivot to something akin to the northern defense strategy of the Cold War era. Naturally, this would spread US and Japanese forces more thinly across the East China Sea and around the Taiwan Strait.
Although China’s foreign military collaborations might allow the PLA to access advanced technologies and gain international exposure, they do not necessarily constitute a direct threat to Taiwan. However, the joint military exercises and actual military exchanges seen under the expansion of strategic partnerships have regional implications. The shift works to influence attitudes toward security in the Taiwan Strait, and to contain the potential of troops assisting in the event of a conflict. This is the real threat posed by an increasingly active Sino-Russian partnership.
Lin Ying-yu is an associate professor at Tamkang University’s Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS