Although the NT$10,000 cash handouts have not yet been distributed, they have already sparked intense online debate regarding how they should be used, with the most heated discussion focused on Buddhist Master Shih Chao-hwei’s (釋昭慧) suggestion to not claim the cash, but rather return it to the government to “expand the nation’s life.”
This reminds me of something I experienced recently.
On a busy street that I often visit, there is a middle-aged man in a wheelchair who sells Yulan magnolias (玉蘭花) with his child. Not far from him is a monk who sits quietly on a small stool between two shops, holding a bowl for alms. Compared with the disabled man — working hard to sell his wares, refusing to bow to fate and earning a living with his own two hands — the monk, who just sits there and receives donations without uttering a word, obviously has it much easier.
As I was passing by that day, the monk had just finished the day’s round of alms. The three of us — myself, the monk and the disabled flower seller — crossed paths right in front of the flower stall, surrounded by an endless stream of hurried pedestrians.
As the monk passed by, he took advantage of the crowd cover and quietly slipped a stack of red bills into the disabled man’s flower basket — which was still full of flowers due to lack of business — then walked away into the crowd as if nothing had happened. If it were not for my sharp eyes and that the three of us just so happened to cross paths at that moment, it would have been nearly impossible for anyone else to notice.
I felt ashamed for having judged the monk’s character based on surface-level observations. With the shame came reflection — the unexpected NT$10,000 that I am about to receive does not need to be returned to the government. It could be donated to a charitable organization.
A charitable organization I once donated to recently sent a letter informing me that donations have dropped significantly this year — likely due to the effects of tariffs and inflation.
Perhaps this is an alternative that everyone can consider.
Jimmy Hsu is a farmer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS