In an authoritarian society, truth is often totally suppressed, maliciously distorted or overshadowed by propaganda. A rare glimpse of the true nature of tyranny was accidentally revealed in the Sept. 3 military parade as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was celebrating the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender and the end of World War II.
The event itself was based on a big lie that it was the CCP that was the champion of defending the Chinese people and defeated the Japanese invasion. Perhaps only a very small percentage of Chinese nowadays know that Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) led the Republic of China (ROC) troops, with many young men and women sacrificing their lives in the war against Japan.
The purpose of such an extravagant show of military might goes beyond Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) intent of invading Taiwan militarily and suppressing the Chinese people’s spirit. It also tries to claim superpower status with the firepower to counter the alliance of democratic and free countries.
However, most Chinese workers still earn wages no better than the third world. The Chinese middle class disappeared at the blink of the eye after iron-fisted nationwide lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic, and people’s wealth was lost as the housing bubble burst. Its economic woes might be worse than the 1929 Great Depression in the US. The high unemployment rate does not provide a prosperous future for the young people. So, many lie flat.
It is clear that in spending US$6.48 billion just for the military parade, Xi has no concern for the poverty, starvation or recent disasters of floods and earthquakes that have hit China.
Where there is no future for the youth, there is no future for the country. Furthermore, military power does not warrant a superpower status, as it can hardly match the soft power of the humanity, civility and creativity of a free country. Besides, only rule of law can set a country free.
A casual conversation before the parade between Xi and Russian President Vladimir Putin was unintentionally broadcast when Putin suggested that even eternal life could be achieved as a result of innovations in biotechnology, and Xi joyfully responded that organ transplants could easily extend lifespans to 150 years, making his 70-year-old self just a child.
Stories painting a horrifying picture of the rampant organ harvesting “business” in China have been circulating online: A 15-year-old high-school student named Hu Xinyu (胡鑫宇) disappeared from his school campus in 2022, and a eulogy described how a retired high-ranking official had had numerous organ transplants. Many young people have disappeared, further implicating officials.
It is unmistakable that the world’s two most notorious dictators have in common the interest of prolonging their lives. However implicit, it might be at the expense of others by taking their organs, especially the young. Is it not creepy? The boast of extending a human life to 150 years reflects truly the worst inhumanity by all measures.
History recorded that more than 2,000 years ago, the most merciless emperor Qin Shihuang (秦始皇), who built the Great Wall by enslaving his people, sent the alchemist Xu Fu (徐福) with 3,000 girls and 3,000 boys eastward to Japan in search of a mythical elixir for immortality.
The similarities of these dictators demonstrate that their arrogance remains invariably consistent through time.
Ironically, the 21st century witnessed the corrupt government in Nepal overthrown by Gen Z, and an interim prime minister elected through messaging app Discord. Where there is a will, there is a way. People power will ultimately prevail over dictatorship.
James J. Y. Hsu is a retired professor of theoretical physics.
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators have twice blocked President William Lai’s (賴清德) special defense budget bill in the Procedure Committee, preventing it from entering discussion or review. Meanwhile, KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) proposed amendments that would enable lawmakers to use budgets for their assistants at their own discretion — with no requirement for receipts, staff registers, upper or lower headcount limits, or usage restrictions — prompting protest from legislative assistants. After the new legislature convened in February, the KMT joined forces with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and, leveraging their slim majority, introduced bills that undermine the Constitution, disrupt constitutional
RSS