In an authoritarian society, truth is often totally suppressed, maliciously distorted or overshadowed by propaganda. A rare glimpse of the true nature of tyranny was accidentally revealed in the Sept. 3 military parade as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was celebrating the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender and the end of World War II.
The event itself was based on a big lie that it was the CCP that was the champion of defending the Chinese people and defeated the Japanese invasion. Perhaps only a very small percentage of Chinese nowadays know that Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) led the Republic of China (ROC) troops, with many young men and women sacrificing their lives in the war against Japan.
The purpose of such an extravagant show of military might goes beyond Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) intent of invading Taiwan militarily and suppressing the Chinese people’s spirit. It also tries to claim superpower status with the firepower to counter the alliance of democratic and free countries.
However, most Chinese workers still earn wages no better than the third world. The Chinese middle class disappeared at the blink of the eye after iron-fisted nationwide lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic, and people’s wealth was lost as the housing bubble burst. Its economic woes might be worse than the 1929 Great Depression in the US. The high unemployment rate does not provide a prosperous future for the young people. So, many lie flat.
It is clear that in spending US$6.48 billion just for the military parade, Xi has no concern for the poverty, starvation or recent disasters of floods and earthquakes that have hit China.
Where there is no future for the youth, there is no future for the country. Furthermore, military power does not warrant a superpower status, as it can hardly match the soft power of the humanity, civility and creativity of a free country. Besides, only rule of law can set a country free.
A casual conversation before the parade between Xi and Russian President Vladimir Putin was unintentionally broadcast when Putin suggested that even eternal life could be achieved as a result of innovations in biotechnology, and Xi joyfully responded that organ transplants could easily extend lifespans to 150 years, making his 70-year-old self just a child.
Stories painting a horrifying picture of the rampant organ harvesting “business” in China have been circulating online: A 15-year-old high-school student named Hu Xinyu (胡鑫宇) disappeared from his school campus in 2022, and a eulogy described how a retired high-ranking official had had numerous organ transplants. Many young people have disappeared, further implicating officials.
It is unmistakable that the world’s two most notorious dictators have in common the interest of prolonging their lives. However implicit, it might be at the expense of others by taking their organs, especially the young. Is it not creepy? The boast of extending a human life to 150 years reflects truly the worst inhumanity by all measures.
History recorded that more than 2,000 years ago, the most merciless emperor Qin Shihuang (秦始皇), who built the Great Wall by enslaving his people, sent the alchemist Xu Fu (徐福) with 3,000 girls and 3,000 boys eastward to Japan in search of a mythical elixir for immortality.
The similarities of these dictators demonstrate that their arrogance remains invariably consistent through time.
Ironically, the 21st century witnessed the corrupt government in Nepal overthrown by Gen Z, and an interim prime minister elected through messaging app Discord. Where there is a will, there is a way. People power will ultimately prevail over dictatorship.
James J. Y. Hsu is a retired professor of theoretical physics.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking